Part of
Language Change at the Interfaces: Intrasentential and intersentential phenomena
Edited by Nicholas Catasso, Marco Coniglio and Chiara De Bastiani
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 275] 2022
► pp. 3560
References
Adda-Decker, Martine, & Lamel, Lori
2018Discovering speech reductions across speaking styles and languages. In Rethinking Reduction: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Conditions, Mechanisms, and Domains for Phonetic Variation [Phonology and Phonetics, 25], Francesco Cangemi, Meghan Clayards, Oliver Niebuhr, Barbara Schuppler & Margaret Zellers (eds), 101–128. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto & Lim, Lisa
Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, Robert D. & Mennen, Inneke
2006Phonetic effects of focus and “tonal crowding” in intonation: Evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48(6): 667–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ASIt: Atlante Sintattico d’Italia
. [URL] (15 June 2021).
Bafile, Laura
1997Parole grammaticali e struttura prosodica: dati dell’italiano e del napoletano. Lingua e Stile. Rivista di Storia della Lingua Italiana 32(3): 433–469.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Hirschberg, Julia
1994The ToBi Annotation Conventions. Ms. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Bergem, Dick R. van
1993Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class. Speech Communication 12(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty
2006Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38(1): 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paulus P. G. & Weenink, David J. M.
2020Praat: Doing phonetics by computer: Version 6.1.14. [URL]> (16 June 2021)
Breitbarth, Anne, Lucas, Christopher & Willis, David
2013Incipient Jespersen’s cycle: the (non-)grammaticalization of new negative markers. In Comparing Diachronies/Sprachwandelvergleich, Jürg Fleischer & Horst Simon (eds), 141–162. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean: Volume II: Patterns and Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2013Logic and Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1976Mica. In Annali della Facoltá di Lettere e Filosofia, Universitá di Padova I, 101–112. Reprinted in Cinque, Guglielmo 1991 Teoria Linguistica e Sintassi Italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia & Turnbull, Rory
2018Exploring variation in phonetic reduction: Linguistic, social, and cognitive factors. In Rethinking Reduction: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Conditions, Mechanisms, and Domains for Phonetic Variation [Phonology and Phonetics, 25], Francesco Cangemi, Meghan Clayards, Oliver Niebuhr, Barbara Schuppler & Margaret Zellers (eds), 25–72. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Niel
2002Modals and negation in English. In Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 47], Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 133–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crocco, Claudia
2013Is Italian Clitic Right Dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of yes/no questions and statements. Lingua 133: 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1979Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Clercq, Karen
2013A Unified Syntax of Negation. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
2017The nanosyntax of French negation: A diachronic perspective. In Studies on Negation: Syntax, Semantics, and Variation, Silvio Cruschina, Katharina Hartmann & Eva Maria Remberger (eds), 49–80. Göttingen: Vienna University Press / V&R unipress.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELAN
2019ELAN (version 5.8) [computer software]. [URL]> (2 May 2020)
Ernestus, Mirjam & Smith, Rachel
2018Qualitative and quantitative aspects of phonetic variation in Dutch eigenlijk. In Rethinking Reduction: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Conditions, Mechanisms, and Domains for Phonetic Variation [Phonology and Phonetics, 25], Francesco Cangemi, Meghan Clayards, Oliver Niebuhr, Barbara Schuppler & Margaret Zellers (eds), 129–163. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1975Pragmatic scales and logical structures. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–375.Google Scholar
Gili Fivela, Barbara, Avesani, Cinzia, Barone, Marco, Bocci, Giuliano, Crocco, Claudia, D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Giordano, Rosa, Marotta, Giovanna, Savino, Michelina & Sorianello, Patrizia
2015Varieties of Italian and their intonational phonology. In Intonation in Romance, Sonia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 140–197. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan
2010Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2014On the interaction between syntax, prosody and information structure. In Information Structure and Word Order Change in Germanic and Romance Languages [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 341–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Israel, Michael
2001Minimizers, maximizers and the rhetoric of scalar reasoning. Journal of Semantics 18: 297–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst og Søn.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É.
1998Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2): 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J.
2006Paradigms in experimental prosodic analysis: From measurement to function. In Methods in Empirical Prosody Research [Language Context and Cognition 3], Stefan Sudhoff, Denisa Lenertova, Roland Meyer, Sandra Pappert, Petra Augurzky, Ina Mleinek, Nicole Richter & Johannes Schließer (eds), 123–152. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
2008Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
1984Phonology: An Introduction to Basic Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn
1963Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35: 1773–1781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech Production and Speech Modelling, William J. Hardcastle and Alain Marchal (eds), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Shapiro, Carmit M.
2016The role of prosody in the grammaticization of Hebrew naxon (‘right/true’): Synchronic and diachronic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 92: 43–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005Standard Negation. The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31], Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plug, Leendert
2005From words to actions: the phonetics of eigenlijk in two communicative contexts. Phonetica 62(2–4): 131–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2008aDoubling as a spare movement strategy. In Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling [Syntax and Semantics 36], Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margret van der Ham (eds), 38–68. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
2008bOn negative doubling. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 8: 57–84.Google Scholar
2010The syntax of focus negation. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 10: 39–61.Google Scholar
2017Negative doubling: In favour of a “Big NegP” analysis. In Studies on Negation: Syntax, Semantics, and Variation, Silvio Cruschina, Katharina Hartmann & Eva Maria Remberger (eds), 81–104. Göttingen: Vienna University Press / V&R unipress.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin
Schwenter, Scott A.
2005The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 115 (10): 1427–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1996The prosodic structure of function words. In Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds), 187–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kim E. A. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
1990The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech, John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds), 72–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher & Breitbarth, Anne
2013Comparing diachronies of negation. In The Development of Negation in the Languages of Europe, Vol. I: Case Studies, David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds), 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, David
2016Incipient Jespersen’s cycle in Old English negation. In Let Us Have Articles Betwixt Us: Papers in Historical and Comparative Linguistics in Honour of Johanna L. Wood, Sten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen & Elly van Gelderen (eds), 465–491. Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar