Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 1–10

Introduction

Discourse particles: syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects

| University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
| University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
| University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Issues under discussion in current research on discourse particles
  • 3.Contributions of this book
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 17 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.int
References (44)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about. In Discourse particles: descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, Werner Abraham (ed), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander-Bakkerus, Astrid. 2011. Some Cholón discourse particles and Quechua homologues. In Lenguas indígenas de América: morfología y sintaxis, Andrés Romero-Figueroa (ed), 11–28. Caracas: Mercantil/ Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Balusu, Rahul. 2019. Fine tuning the Dravidian left periphery: The three ‘complementizers’ in Telugu. In Proceedings of the workshop “Clause typing and the syntax-to-discourse relation in head-final languages”, Josef Bayer & Yvonne Viesel (eds), 13–38. Konstanz: Fachbereich Linguistik der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2012. From modal particle to interrogative marker: a study of German denn. In Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Laura Brugé (ed), 13–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef, Hinterhölzl, Roland & Trotzke, Andreas 2015. Discourse-oriented syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Struckmeier, Volker. 2017a. Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Volker Struckmeier. 2017b. The status quo of research on discourse particles in syntax and semantics. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 1–14. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bhadra, Diti. 2017. Evidentiality and questions: Bangla at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Biberauer, Theresa and Sheehan, Michelle. 2011. Introduction: particles through a modern syntactic lens. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 387–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeder, Winfried. 2002. Speech and thought representation in the Kartvelian (South Caucasian) languages. In Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador. (eds), 3–49, Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistics domains. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2007. German modal particles in the IP-domain. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 32: 3–37.Google Scholar
. 2008. Modal particles in Italian. Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Corr, Alice. 2016. Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola. 2013. Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Gobbo, Francesca, Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2015. On sentential particles: A crosslinguistic study. In Final particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 359–386. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Euskaltzaindia. 1987. Euskal gramatika. Lehen urratsak II. Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.
Farkas, Donka. & Bruce, Kim. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 6(1: 131): 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick. 2006. German discourse particles are weak sentence adverbs. In Proceedings of the ‘XXXII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Maria C. Picchi & Alan Pona (eds), 79–91. Florence: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
. 2016. Information structure and discourse particles. In The Oxford handbook of information structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 336–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hack, Franziska M. 2014. The particle po in the varieties of Dolomitic Ladin – grammaticalisation from a temporal adverb into an interrogative marker. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 49–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. West flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 116–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje. 2015. Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Lam, Zoe W.M., Osa-Gómez, Adriana, Thoma, Sonja & Wiltschko, Martina. 2016. Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37(2): 109–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Munaro, Nicola. 2015. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Discourse-oriented syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds), 41–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko N. Izutsu. 2013. From discourse markers to modal/final particles. In Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description, Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds), 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. On the semantics of modal particles. In Discourse particles: descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, Werner Abraham (ed), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuong, Io-Kei J. 2008. Yes/no question particles revisited: The grammatical functions of mo4, me1, and maa3. In The 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), Marjorie Chang (ed), 715–733. Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kuwabara, Kazuki. 2013. Peripheral effects in Japanese questions and the fine structure of CP. Lingua 126: 92–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Zoe W. 2014. A complex ForceP for speaker-and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35(2): 61–80.Google Scholar
Modicom, Pierre-Yves and Duplâtre, Olivier. 2020. Information-structural perspectives on discourse particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pankau, Andreas. 2018. The Syntax of ‘n in North East Berlin German. In the workshop Recent Issues in the Syntax of Questions. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, 2018/10/8–10.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 77–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf P. G. de. 2008. Standard Basque: A progressive grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scherf, Nathalie. 2017. The syntax of Swedish modal particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 78–99. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker. 2014. Ja doch wohl C? Modal Particles in German as C-related elements. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, J. 2019. Evidentiality in Tagalog. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie & Leuschner, Torsten. 2015. Dutch (’t) schijnt and German scheint (') s: on the grammaticalization of evidential particles. Studia Lingüística 69(1): 86–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eys, Willem J. 1879. Grammaire comparée des dialectes basques. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans & Links, Meta. 2020. Discourse particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse management. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 3. 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2017. Ergative constellations in the structure of speech acts. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon (ed), 419–446. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar