Cover not available
Part of
Differential Object Marking in Romance: Towards microvariation
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Alexandru Mardale
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 280] 2023
► pp. 315–347

A micro-comparative approach to DOM in language-contact environments

The case of Catalan, Basque and Spanish

| University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
| University of Barcelona
This paper focuses on the interaction between Spanish DOM, on the one hand, and Basque and Catalan DOM on the other. We thus address the contact situation attested among these languages from a micro-comparative perspective and we base on both diachronic as well as synchronic data. In Basque the phenomenon is attested in Southwestern varieties, that is, in those varieties which are in contact with Spanish. In Catalan, it is widespread across most dialects, except for Roussillon Catalan (spoken in France), which aligns with Basque Northeastern varieties, also in contact with French. In both languages, the use of DOM has traditionally been considered by the prescriptive grammars as the result of the influence and pressure of Spanish, although several factors lead us to relativize the impact of such contact scenario.
Keywords: differential object marking, Basque, Catalan, Spanish, language contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The sociolinguistics of DOM in Basque and Catalan
  • 3.The morphosyntactic characterization of DOM in Catalan, Basque and Spanish
  • 4.Factors that trigger DOM in Catalan, Basque and Spanish
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • The following abbreviations will be used in the text
  • References
Published online: 27 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.280.12odr
References (104)
References
Adell, M. V. (1994). Problemàtica de l’acusatiu preposicional en català: Notes al voltant de Roís de Corella. In Miscel·lània Germà Colón (pp. 113–149). Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apalauza, A. (2008). Nafarroako Ipar-mendebaldeko euskara: Imotz, Basaburua Nagusia, Larraun, eta Araitz-Betelu. Fontes Linguae Vasconum, 107, 63–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Nafarroako ipar-mendebaleko hizkeren egitura geolinguistikoa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UPV/EHU.
Arraztio, K. (2010). Datibo osagarri bitxiak Araitz-Beteluko hizkeran. In B. Fernández, P. Albizu, & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai. Supplements of ASJU 52 (pp. 113–149). UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Aurrekoetxea, J., Txillardegi, & Aurrekoetxea, G. (1983). Euskal dialektologiaren hastapenak. UEU.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (2006). Dative over-marking in Basque: Evidence of Spanish-Basque convergence. Euskalingua, 6, 136–145.Google Scholar
(2015). Transfer and contact-induced variation in child Basque. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benito, R. (2016). Differential object marking in Catalan: Contexts of appearance and analysis (Unpublished MA thesis). Universitat de Barcelona.
(forthcoming). Processament, coneixement i ús del Marcatge Diferencial d’Objecte en parlants monolingües i bilingües d’espanyol i català (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Bilbao, K., Odria, A., Berro, A., Landa, J. & Fernández, B. (2022). Euskara Bariazioan / Basque in Variation (BiV) (3rd ed.). UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Bleam, T. (1999). Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware.
Bonaparte, L. L. (1869). Le verbe basque en tableaux. Reprinted in Opera omnia vasconice (ed. 1991, Vol. 1, pp. 221–242). Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner, & D. A. Kibee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics. Selected papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, April 7–9, 1988 (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugè, L., & Brugger, G. (1996). On the accusative a in Spanish. Probus, 8(1), 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabanes, V. (1994). Anàlisi de la construcció d’objecte directe de persona en català (segles XIII–XVI). Estudi del sintagma article + substantiu. In J. Todolí et al. (Eds.), Estudis sobre morfologia valenciana: Miscel·lània 94 (pp. 77–136). Marfil, Generalitat Valenciana.Google Scholar
(1995). Anàlisi de la construcció d’objecte directe de persona en català (segles XIII–XVI). Estudi del nom propi. A Sol Post, 3, 47–89.Google Scholar
Camino, I. (1997). Aezkoako euskararen azterketa dialektologikoa. Nafarroako Gobernua.Google Scholar
Company, C. (2002). Grammaticalization and category weakness. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 201–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpus Informatitzat del Català Antic (CICA), J. Torruella (dir.), with M. Pérez Saldanya & J. Martines. from [URL]
Corpus Informatitzat del Català Modern, under construction, not available online.
Dixon, R. M. W. (1979). Ergativity. Language, 55, 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elordui, A. (1996). Hegomendebaldeko bizkieraren aditz egituraren aldaketa-bilakabidea eta hizkuntz desagerpena. ASJU, 30(3), 713–751.Google Scholar
Elordui, A., Aiestaran, J., Bereziartua, G., Epelde, I., Ibarra, O., Jauregi, O., Mimenza, L., Muguruza, B., Odria, A., & Sarasua, A. (2019). Gaztesare database. UPV/EHU, UPNA/NUP and IKER CNRS.Google Scholar
Epelde, I., & Isasi-Isasmendi, A. (2020). MELAN database. IKER CNRS.Google Scholar
Erdozia, J. L. (2001). Sakana erdialdeko euskara. Nafarroako Gobernua.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M. V. (2009). Differential object marking and topicality. The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33(4), 832–885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2013). Differential object marking in Spanish. Borealis. An International Journal of Spanish Linguistics, 2(2), 1–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, I. (1994). Isoglosas internas del castellano. El sistema referencial del pronombre átono de tercera persona. Revista de Filología Española, 74(1/2), 71–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española I (pp. 1317–1394). Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
(2012). Dialect areas and linguistic change. Pronominal paradigms in Ibero-Romance dialects from a cross-linguistic and social typology perspective. In G. De Vogelaer & G. Seiler (eds.), The dialect laboratory. Dialects as a testing ground for theories of language change (pp. 73–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, B., & Rezac, M. (2010). Datibo osagarri bitxiak eta Datiboaren Lekualdatzea: ari nai diyot eta kanta egin nazu bidegurutzean. In B. Fernández, P. Albizu, & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai. Supplements of ASJU, 52 (pp. 113–149). UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Fernández, B., & M. Rezac. (2016). Differential object marking in Basque varieties. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (pp. 93–139). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraile, I., & Fraile, A. (1996). Oiartzungo hizkera. Oiartzungo Udala.Google Scholar
Franco, J. A. (1993). Conditions on clitic doubling: The agreement hypothesis. ASJU, 27, 285–298.Google Scholar
Gaminde, I., Romero, A., & Legarra, H. (2012). Gramatika eta hizkuntza bariazioa Bermeon. Bermeoko Udala and Campos Hegaluzea.Google Scholar
García García, M. (2014). Differentielle Objecktmarkierung bei unbelebten Objekten im Spanischen. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Nominal and verbal parameters in the diachrony of differential object marking in Spanish. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack-Makarevich (Eds.), The diachronic typology of differential argument marking (pp. 207–239). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Garmendia, L., & K. Etxabe. (2004). Ordiziako euskara: Garai bateko bizimodua eta gaurko hizkuntza-egoera. Ordiziako Udala.Google Scholar
Gómez, G. (2016). Gramàtica del català rossellonès. Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. von. (2008). Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in Spanish. Probus, 20, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heusinger, K. von., & Kaiser, G. A. (2005). The evolution of differential object marking in Spanish. In K. von Heusinger, G. A. Kaiser, & E. Stark (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Specificity and the evolution /emergence of nominal determination systems in Romance” (pp. 33–69). University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G. A. (2011). Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology, 21, 593–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (1992). Catalan. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I., Elordieta, G., & Elordieta, A. (1994). The Basque dialect of Lequeitio. Supplements of ASJU, 34. UPV/EHU and Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia.Google Scholar
Hurtado, I. (2001). Goierriko eta Tolosalde hegoaldeko hizkerak. Goierriko Euskal Eskola Kultur Elkartea, Maizpide Euskaltegia eta Lazkaoko Udala.Google Scholar
Ibarra, O. (1995). Ultzamako hizkera. Inguruko euskalkiekiko harremanak. Nafarroako Gobernua.Google Scholar
(2000). Erroibarko eta Esteribarko hizkera. Iruñea: Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa (UPNA/NUP).Google Scholar
Irimia, M. A., & Pineda, A. (2019). Differential object marking and Scales: Insights from Romance diachrony. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4(57), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irimia, M. A. & Pineda, A. (2021). On the setting of scales in the diachrony of Differential Object Marking, Journal of Historical Syntax, 5, article 8, 1–41.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Foris.Google Scholar
Jiménez Gaspar, A. (2020). Bilingualism and language change: The production of the pronominal clitics and the differential object marking in Majorcan Catalan and Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Laca, B. (1995). Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español. In C. Pensado (Ed.), El complemento directo preposicional (pp. 6–91). Visor.Google Scholar
(2006). El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In C. Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal (Vol. 1, pp. 423–475). Fondode cultura económica/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Landa, A. (1995). Conditions on null objects in Basque Spanish and their relation to Leísmo and clitic doubling (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking in Spanish. Probus, 20, 33–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López, L. (2012). Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makazaga, J. M. (2009). Elgoibarko hizkera (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UPV/EHU.
Mayer, E. (2017). Spanish clitics on the move. Variation in time and space. The Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, H. (1947). O problema do acusativo preposicional no catalão. Boletím de Filología, 8, 237–260.Google Scholar
(1948). Sobre as origens do acusativo preposicional nas línguas românicas. In H. Meier (Ed.), Ensaios de filologia românica (pp. 115–164). Edição da ‘Revista de Portugal’.Google Scholar
Mounole, C. (2012). Evolution of the transitive verbs in Basque and apparition of datively marked patients. In G. Authier & K. Haude (Eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice (pp. 355–379). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naess, Å. (2007). Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odria, A. (2014). Differential object marking and the nature of dative case in Basque varieties. Linguistic Variation, 14(2), 289–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Differential object marking and datives in Basque syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UPV/EHU.
(2019). Differential object arking in Basque and Spanish dialects. In A. Berro, B. Fernández, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Basque and Romance: Aligning grammars (pp. 243–275). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2013a). Differential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2(2), 221–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b). Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus, 25(2), 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pensado, C. (1995). El complemento directo preposicional: Estado de la cuestión y bibliografía comentada. In C. Pensado (Ed.), El complemento directo preposicional (pp. 11–59). Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Perera i Parramon, J. (1986). Contribució a l’estudi de les preposicions en el Tirant lo Blanch (primera part). Llengua and Literatura, 1, 51–109.Google Scholar
Perpiñán, S. (2018). On convergence, ongoing language change, and crosslinguistic influence in direct object expression in Catalan–Spanish bilingualism. Languages, 3(14), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A. (2018). Acostament al marcatge diferencial d’objecte als inicis del català modern. In Gramàtica del Català Modern (1601–1833). Special issue of eHumanista/IVITRA, 14, 570–596.Google Scholar
(2021a). The development of DOM in the diachrony of Catalan: (Dis)similarities with respect to Spanish. In J. Kabatek, P. Obrist, & A. Wall (Eds.), Differential object marking in Romance – The third wave (pp. 243–277). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b). El marcatge diferencial d’objecte en català (i Fabra). In M. À. Pradilla (Ed.), De llengua i societat: De la proposta fabriana a la reforma normativa de l’IEC (pp. 211–222). Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
(forthcoming). Differential object marking in Catalan. Past, present and future.
(in press). El complement directe (I): El marcatge diferencial d’objecte. In J. Martines, M. Pérez-Saldanya, & G. Rigau (Eds.), Gramàtica del català antic.
(2023a). L’acusatiu preposicional en català: d’on venim i cap a on anem? Caplletra. Revista Internacional de Filologia, 74, 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023b). L’acusatiu preposicional en català: història, controvèrsia i ús. Llengua & Literatura, 33, 113–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., Cunnings, I., Bayram, F., Miller, D., Tubau, S., & Rothman, J. (2018). Language dominance affects bilingual performance and processing outcomes in adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., Miller, D., & Rothman, J. (2017). Adult outcomes of early child second language (L2) acquisition: Differential object marking in the child L2 Spanish of Catalan natives. In M. LaMendola & J. Scott (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 546–558). Cascadilla PressGoogle Scholar
Ramsden, H. (1961). The use of a + personal pronoun in Old Spanish. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 38, 42–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezac, M., & Fernández, B. (2013). Dative displacement in Basque. In B. Fernández, & R. Etxepare (Eds.), Variation in datives: A micro-comparative perspective (pp. 256–282). Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
Rodriguez-Ordóñez, I. (2013). Contact-induced phenomena in Gernika Basque: The case of dative over-marking. In C. Howe, S. E. Blackwell, & M. Lubbers Quesada (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 236–251). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. (2016). DOM in Basque: Grammaticalization, attitudes and ideological representations. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
(2017). Reexamining differential object marking as a linguistic contact-phenomenon in Gernika Basque. Journal of Language Contact, 10, 318–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020a). Basque differential object marking as a contact phenomenon: How and why? Journal of Language Contact, 13(1), 227–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). The acquisition of differential objcet marking as a sociolinguistic variable. In A. Mardale & S. Montrul (Eds.), The acquisition of differential object marking (pp. 105–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). The role of social meaning in contact-induced variation among new speakers of Basque. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25(4), 533–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarzazu, T. (2005). Hondarribiko eta Irungo euskara. Alberdania.Google Scholar
Sancho Cremades, P. (1995). La categoria preposicional. Universitat de València.Google Scholar
(2002). La preposició i el sintagma preposicional. In J. Solà, M.-R. Lloret, J. Mascaró, & M. Pérez Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (Vol. 2, pp. 1749–1768). Empúries.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–171). Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Swart, P. de. (2007). Cross-linguistic variation in object marking. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Thomason, S. G. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urrutia-Cárdenas, H. (1995). Morphosyntactic features in the Spanish of the Basque Country. In C. Silva-Corvalán (Ed.), Spanish in four continents (pp. 243–259.) Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Los clíticos de tercera persona en el español en el País Vasco. Revista de Filología y su Didáctica, 26, 517–538.Google Scholar
Yrizar, P. (1981). Contribución a la dialectología de la lengua vasca (2 Vols.). Gipuzkoako Kutxa.Google Scholar
Zuazo, K. (2000). Euskararen sendabelarrak. Alberdania.Google Scholar
(2010). Sakanako euskara. Burundako hizkera. Nafarroako Gobernua and Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
(2014). Euskalkiak. Elkar.Google Scholar