Infinitival Syntax
Infinitivus Pro Participio as a repair strategy
This monograph offers a new analysis of West Germanic ‘Infinitivus Pro Participio’ (IPP) constructions, within the framework of Optimality Theory. IPP constructions have long been problematic for syntactic theory, because a bare infinitive is preferred over the expected past participle. The book shows how the substitution of the past participle by the infinitive in IPP constructions can be captured straightforwardly if constraints are assumed to be violable. The basic idea is that IPP constructions are exceptional because they violate otherwise valid rules of the language. Thus, IPP is a ‘last resort’ or repair strategy, which is only visible in cases in which the past participle would be ‘even worse’ . Furthermore, as the choice of Optimality Theory naturally leads to a crosslinguistic account, the book systematically examines and compares infinitival constructions from seven West Germanic languages including Afrikaans, Dutch, German, West Flemish, and three Swiss German dialects.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 79] 2005. xiv, 251 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. v
-
List of constraints | p. xiii
-
Introduction | p. 1
-
Infinitive or past particle | p. 9
-
The verb order | p. 35
-
Main features of previous analyses of the IPP | p. 83
-
Introduction to Optimality Theory (OT) | p. 97
-
A case study of German I: Obligatory versus impossible IPP | p. 105
-
A case study of German II: The verb order | p. 153
-
Optional IPP in German | p. 179
-
Parameterisation in OT: The other languages | p. 201
-
Conclusion | p. 233
-
-
Index | p. 247
“The comparative approach of this study is very attractive. First, although it has often been noted in the literature that IPP can be found in several languages, the studies so far are restricted to Dutch and German. The study at hand fills this gap. Second, a lot of data are given and they are presented in a very thorough and systematic way. Third, and what is most important, the study succeeds in giving an analysis which goes beyond an analysis of IPP for the individual languages.”
Barbara Schlücker, Freie Universität Berlin, on Linguist List Vol.
16.3587
, 2005
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz
Murphy, Andrew
Salzmann, Martin
Salzmann, Martin
Schallert, Oliver & Antje Dammel
2019. Introduction. In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207], ► pp. 1 ff.
Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde
2018. Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax. Constructions and Frames 10:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Hinterhölzl, Roland
Abels, Klaus
Gaeta, Livio
2015. Multiple sources for the German scandal construction. In On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change [Benjamins Current Topics, 79], ► pp. 95 ff.
Pitteroff, Marcel
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts
Schallert, Oliver
2014. IPP-Constructions in Alemannic and Bavarian in comparison. In Bavarian Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 220], ► pp. 247 ff.
Ørsnes, Bjarne
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General