Copular Clauses
Specification, predication and equation
| University of California, Berkeley
This book is concerned with a class of copular clauses known as specificational clauses, and its relation to other kinds of copular structures, predicational and equative clauses in particular. Based on evidence from Danish and English, I argue that specificational clauses involve the same core predication structure as predicational clauses — one which combines a referential and a predicative expression to form a minimal predicational unit — but differ in how the predicational core is realized syntactically. Predicational copular clauses represent the canonical realization, where the referential expression is aligned with the most prominent syntactic position, the subject position. Specificational clauses involve an unusual alignment of the predicative expression with subject position. I suggest that this unusual alignment is grounded in information structure: the alignment of the less referential DP with the subject position serves a discourse connective function by letting material that is relatively familiar in the discourse appear before material that is relatively unfamiliar in the discourse. Equative clauses are argued to be fundamentally different.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 85] 2005. viii, 210 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
|
vii
|
1. Introduction
|
1–3
|
I. Structure
|
4
|
2. Predicate topicalization
|
6–40
|
3. Alternative structures for specificational clauses
|
41–45
|
II. Meaning
|
46
|
4. Decomposing copular clauses
|
48–63
|
5. Determining the subject type
|
64–93
|
6. The type of the predicate complement
|
94–107
|
7. Consequences and extensions
|
108–130
|
III. Use
|
131
|
8. Aspects of use
|
133–161
|
9. An intergrated analysis
|
162–190
|
10.Conclusion
|
191–194
|
References
|
195–204
|
Index
|
205–210
|
“This is a beautiful piece of work, one that I have had much pleasure reading and discussing with students and colleagues. Mikkelsen's account of copular clauses is simply elegant. She is so thorough in her treatment of these copular constructions that in our discussion of her analysis in a recent MIT seminar there wasn't any comment that wasn't already anticipated in her own caveats and footnotes.”
Michel DeGraff, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT
Cited by
Cited by 57 other publications
Antón-Méndez, Inés
Aravind, Athulya, Martin Hackl & Ken Wexler
Arregi, Karlos, Itamar Francez & Martina Martinović
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Luca Ciucci & Margherita Farina
Bondaruk, Anna
Bondaruk, Anna
Béjar, Susana
BÉJAR, SUSANA & ARSALAN KAHNEMUYIPOUR
Castroviejo, Elena, Katherine Fraser & Agustín Vicente
Christopher, Nadezda
Davidse, Kristin & Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende
Delahunty, Gerald P.
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
Felka, Katharina
FLEISHER, NICHOLAS
García Castillero, Carlos
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna
Hartmann, Jutta & Caroline Heycock
Hartmann, Jutta M.
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
Heycock, Caroline
Jin, Dawei
Kumamoto, Chiaki
KUMAMOTO, CHIAKI
Lauwers, Peter & Els Tobback
Lee, Seung-Ah
Massam, Diane & Erin Grant
Milway, Daniel
Nie, Xiaowen & Feng-hsi Liu
Nuger, Justin
Palancar, Enrique L.
Praet, Wout Van
Rieppel, Michael
Rieppel, Michael
Ringstad, Tina Louise
Sabbagh, Joseph
Schwartzkopff, Robert
Snyder, Eric
Sprugnoli, Rachele & Sara Tonelli
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
Van Praet, Wout
Zhang, Niina Ning
Ørsnes, Bjarne
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General