Copular Clauses
Specification, predication and equation
Author
This book is concerned with a class of copular clauses known as specificational clauses, and its relation to other kinds of copular structures, predicational and equative clauses in particular. Based on evidence from Danish and English, I argue that specificational clauses involve the same core predication structure as predicational clauses — one which combines a referential and a predicative expression to form a minimal predicational unit — but differ in how the predicational core is realized syntactically. Predicational copular clauses represent the canonical realization, where the referential expression is aligned with the most prominent syntactic position, the subject position. Specificational clauses involve an unusual alignment of the predicative expression with subject position. I suggest that this unusual alignment is grounded in information structure: the alignment of the less referential DP with the subject position serves a discourse connective function by letting material that is relatively familiar in the discourse appear before material that is relatively unfamiliar in the discourse. Equative clauses are argued to be fundamentally different.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 85] 2005. viii, 210 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. vii
-
1. Introduction | pp. 1–3
-
I. Structure
-
2. Predicate topicalization | pp. 6–40
-
3. Alternative structures for specificational clauses | pp. 41–45
-
II. Meaning
-
4. Decomposing copular clauses | pp. 48–63
-
5. Determining the subject type | pp. 64–93
-
6. The type of the predicate complement | pp. 94–107
-
7. Consequences and extensions | pp. 108–130
-
III. Use
-
8. Aspects of use | pp. 133–161
-
9. An intergrated analysis | pp. 162–190
-
10.Conclusion | pp. 191–194
-
-
Index | pp. 205–210
“This is a beautiful piece of work, one that I have had much pleasure reading and discussing with students and colleagues. Mikkelsen's account of copular clauses is simply elegant. She is so thorough in her treatment of these copular constructions that in our discussion of her analysis in a recent MIT seminar there wasn't any comment that wasn't already anticipated in her own caveats and footnotes.”
Michel DeGraff, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT
Cited by (103)
Cited by 103 other publications
Borchmann, Simon
Mendia, Jon Ander & M.Teresa Espinal
Park, Chongwon, Jaehoon Yeon & Jong-Bok Kim
2024. Setting subject and the inferential cleft construction in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Alcocer Urueta, Ricardo
Allahem, Khawlah Sulaiman & Bader Yousef Alharbi
Bejar, Susana & Arsalan Kahnemuyipour
BÉJAR, SUSANA & ARSALAN KAHNEMUYIPOUR
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
Fukuda, Shin
Kujath, Elizabeth & Jenneke van der Wal
Martinović, Martina
Okubo, Wataru & Hiroki Nomoto
2023. Chapter 9. A null stem analysis of Persian copular verbs. In Advances in Iranian Linguistics II [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 361], ► pp. 231 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Park, Chongwon & Jaehoon Yeon
2023. The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 140 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Akinlotan, Mayowa
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2022. An analysis ofThe thing is that Ssentences. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 41 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jenks, Peter & Rassidatou Konate
Jin, Dawei & Jun Chen
Lien, Chinfa
2022. Interpreting the eventive copula 做 tso3 in Taiwanese Southern Min. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 155 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Silvagni, Federico
Snyder, Eric, Richard Samuels & Stewart Shapiro
Winter, Yoad
Arregi, Karlos, Itamar Francez & Martina Martinović
Castroviejo, Elena, Katherine Fraser & Agustín Vicente
Djärv, Kajsa
Jurczyk, Rafał
Nie, Xiaowen & Feng-hsi Liu
2021. Indefinite subjects in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:2 ► pp. 181 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Oda, Hiromune
Palancar, Enrique L. & Martine Vanhove
Park, Dongwoo
Saab, Andrés & Eleonora Orlando
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
2021. To what extent can source-based olfactory verbs be classified as copulas? The case of German and Polish. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 403 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Christopher, Nadezda
2020. Chapter 3. Kazakh particle ğoj as an existential operator. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 72 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna
Jin, Dawei
Jin, Dawei
Lauwers, Peter & Els Tobback
Milway, Daniel
Zhang, Niina Ning
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Luca Ciucci & Margherita Farina
2019. Two types of morphologically expressed non-verbal predication. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 120 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Branigan, Phil & Douglas Wharram
Chirkova, Katia
Davidse, Kristin & Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
2019. Restrictions on “Low” person agreement in Dutch specificational
copular constructions. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36 ► pp. 130 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Caroline Heycock
Keine, Stefan, Michael Wagner & Jessica Coon
Praet, Wout Van
2019. Aspect and modality in English predicative and specificational copular clauses. English Text Construction 12:2 ► pp. 196 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Praet, Wout
Van Praet, Wout
2021. Re-evaluating the importance of discourse-embedding for specificational and predicative clauses. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:4 ► pp. 560 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
van Praet, Wout
Ringstad, Tina Louise
Seres, Daria & M.Teresa Espinal
Sprugnoli, Rachele & Sara Tonelli
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
Aravind, Athulya, Martin Hackl & Ken Wexler
Borga, Jason & William Snyder
Citko, Barbara, Allison Germain & Jacek Witkoś
Hartmann, Jutta M.
2018. A focus analysis of apparent predicational clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 121 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Palancar, Enrique L.
2018. Chapter 9. Subjects and focus in clefts. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 245 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
den Dikken, Marcel
Hartmann, Jutta & Caroline Heycock
2017. Variation in copular agreement in Insular Scandinavian. In Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 1], ► pp. 233 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Snyder, Eric
Lee, Seung-Ah
Nuger, Justin
Schwartzkopff, Robert
Schwartzkopff, Robert
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
Felka, Katharina
Massam, Diane & Erin Grant
Sabbagh, Joseph
García Castillero, Carlos
Rieppel, Michael
Rieppel, Michael
Ørsnes, Bjarne
Bondaruk, Anna
Bondaruk, Anna
2014. Polish equatives as symmetrical structures. In Advances in the Syntax of DPs [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 217], ► pp. 61 ff. ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Heycock, Caroline
Heycock, Caroline
Kumamoto, Chiaki
KUMAMOTO, CHIAKI
Béjar, Susana
FLEISHER, NICHOLAS
Antón-Méndez, Inés
Richardson, Kylie
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General