Commentary
The scope of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis
References
Goad, H., & White, L.
(
2008)
Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach.
Lingua, 118(4), 577–594.


Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J.
(
2003)
Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48(3/4), 243–263.

Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S.
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
(
2004)
Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity.
Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69.


Lardiere, D.
(
1998)
Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state.
Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26.


Lieberman, M.
(
2013,
January). The importance of comprehension to a rounded view of second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Department of Linguistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Cited in
Goad, H. &
White, L. 2019
Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars.
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.

Prévost, P., & White, L.
(
2000)
Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement.
Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133.


Özçelik, Ö.
(
2016)
The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology.
Glossa, 1(1): 281. 1–48.


Özçelik, Ö.
(
2017)
The Foot is not an obligatory constituent of the Prosodic Hierarchy: “stress” in Turkish, French and child English.
The Linguistic Review, 34(1). 157–213.


Özçelik, Ö.
(
2018)
Universal Grammar and second language phonology: Full Transfer / Prevalent Access in the L2 acquisition of Turkish “stress” by English and French speakers.
Language Acquisition, 25(3), 231–267.


Trenkic, D.
(
2007)
Variability in L2 article production – beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate.
Second Language Research, 23(3), 289–327.

