Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 8:3 (2018) ► pp. 343–371

Focus in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals

| Ocean County College
The main objective of this study is to investigate the acoustic correlates of focus in late and simultaneous bilinguals of Hindi and Indian English (IE). The main acoustic correlates of focus in American/British English are duration, amplitude and F0 and in Hindi are duration, F0 excursion and post-focal pitch compression. In the present study, I look at duration, RMS amplitude and F0 excursion in broad focus, narrow focus and post-focus declarative present tense, past tense and perfect aspect (both transitive and intransitive verbs) Hindi and IE sentences, to explore if there are any differences in the two bilingual groups and to understand the acoustic correlates of focus in IE and Hindi.
Keywords: Focus, simultaneous, late bilinguals
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background Information
      • 1.1.1Focus
      • 1.1.2Focus in Hindi
      • 1.1.3Indian English intonation and focus
      • 1.1.4Language interaction in bilinguals
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Recordings
    • 2.2Speakers
    • 2.3Speech material
    • 2.4Measurements
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Indian English: duration
    • 3.2Indian English: RMS amplitude
    • 3.3Indian English: F0 excursion
    • 3.4Hindi: duration
    • 3.5Hindi: RMS amplitude
    • 3.6Hindi: F0 excursion
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15009.pur
References
Arvaniti, A. and M. Baltazani
1999 Greek ToBI. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences Satellite Meeting.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., Bates, D. M.
2008 Mixed-effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., and Pierrehumbert, J. B.
1986 Intonational Structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 31, 255–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, R. M.
2000 Optimal Expressions in Indian English. English Language and Linguistics, 4.1. 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., and Hakuta, K.
1994 In Other Words: The Psychology and Science of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
BirdSong, D. and Molis, M.
2001 On the Evidence for Maturational Constraints in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 441: 235–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D.
2012 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.3.35) [Computer program]. From http://​www​.praat​.org/
Botinis, A., Fourakis, M., Gawronska, B.
1999 Focus Identification in English, Greek and Swedish. Proceedings of the 14th international Congress of Phonetic Sciences San Francisco. 1557–1560.Google Scholar
Cole, J. Hualde, J. I., Blasingame, M. Yoonsook Mo
2010 Shifting Chicago vowels: prosody and sound change. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010. Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. J., Eady, S. R. and Mueller, P. R.
1985 Acoustical Aspects of Contrastive Stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 771: 2142–2155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
1997 English as a Global Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
D’Imperio, M.
1997 Breadth of Focus, Modality and Prominence Perception in Neopolitan Italian. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 501: 19–39.Google Scholar
Dohen, M. and Loevenbruck H.
2004 Pre-focal Rephrasing, Focal Enhancement and Post-focal Deaccentuation in French”, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1313–1316, Jeju, Korea.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S. Sebastián-Gallés, N.
2009 Limits on Bilingualism Revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in Simultaneous French–Spanish Bilinguals. Cognition.Google Scholar
Dyrud L. O.
2001 Hindi-Urdu: Stress Accent or Non-stress Accent? M.A. Thesis. University of North Dakota.Google Scholar
Erickson and I. Lehiste
1995 Contrastive Emphasis in Elicited Dialogue: Durational Compensation. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 41, 352–55.Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, E.
2000 The Use and Realisation of Accentual Focus in Central Catalan with a Comparison to English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University College, London, UK.Google Scholar
Féry, C. and Kügler, F.
2008 Pitch Accent Scaling on Given, New and Focused Constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics 361, 680–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I.
2003 Interaction Between the Native and Second Language Phonetic Subsystems. Speech Communication, 401, 467–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S.
1993 On the Prosody of Focus in European Portuguese. Proceedings of the Workshop on Phonology. Lisboa: APL. 45–66.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B.
1958 Experiments in the Perception of Stress. Language and Speech 271:765–768.Google Scholar
Garcia-Lecumberri, M. L.
1995 Intonational Signaling of Information Structure in English and in Spanish: A Comparative study. Ph D dissertation. University College London.Google Scholar
Gay, T.
1978 Physiological and Acoustic Correlates of Perceived Stress. Language and Speech 211: 347–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genzel, S. and Kügler, F.
2010 Phonetic Implementation of Focal Prominence in Hindi. Speech Prosody Conference proceeding.Google Scholar
Government of India
2002b India 2002: A Reference Manual. New Delhi: Ministry of. Information and Broadcasting, Publications Division.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C.
1983 Focus, Mode and the Nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 191, 377–417. Reprinted in Gussenhoven (1984). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G.
2003 The Vowel System of Quichua-Spanish Bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second language, Phonetica 601, 98–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamers, J. and Blanc, M.
2000 Bilinguality and Bilingualism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnsberger, J. and Jasmeet J.
1996 Pitch Range and Focus in Hindi. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99:2493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnsberger J.
1994 Towards an Intonational Phonology of Hindi. Unpublished manuscript. http://​www​.personal​.umich​.edu​/~jharns​/hindi​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
2003 World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E.
1989 Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language. Cognitive Psychology, 211, 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B.
2005 Asian Englishes: Beyond the Cathatnon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, K.-H. & Guion
2006 Phonological Systems in Bilinguals: Age of Learning Effects on the Stop Consonant Systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1191, 1672–1683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. R.
1996 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-C., Xu, Y.
2010 Phonetic Realization of Contrastive Focus in Korean. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, 1000331, 1–4.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H.
1967 Biological Foundation of Language. New York: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, J.
1996 Becoming Bilingual: Language Acquisition in a Bilingual Community, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England; Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Maxwell, O., Fletcher, J.
2009 Acoustic and durational properties of Indian English vowels. World Englishes 2009; 281: 52–70.Google Scholar
Maxwell, O.
2014 The Intonational Phonology of Indian English: An Autosegmental-Metrical Analysis Based on Bengali and Kannada English. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
McGory, J. T.
1997 Acquisition of Intonational Prominence in English by Seoul Korean and Mandarin Chinese speakers, Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ménard, L., Loevenbruck, H. and Savariaux, C.
2006 Articulatory and Acoustic Correlates of Contrastive Focus in French Children and Adults. In Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes and Techniques, J. Harrington and M. Tabain (Eds.) 227–251.Google Scholar
Mixdorff, H.
2004 Quantitative Tone and Intonation Modeling Across Languages. Proceedings of International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages Beijing, 137–142.Google Scholar
Moore, R. R.
1965 A Study of Hindi Intonation. University of Michigan. (Unpublished dissertation).Google Scholar
Moon, R.
2002 A Comparison of the Acoustic Correlates of Focus in Indian English and American English. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E.
2005 Intonation and Language Contact: A Case Study of Two Varieties of Peruvian Spanish, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Patil, U., Kentner, G., Gollrad, A., Kügler, F., Féry, C., Vasishth, S.
2008 Focus, Word order, and Intonation in Hindi. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 11, 53–70.Google Scholar
Peltola, M.S., Tamminen, H., Lehtola, H., Aaltonen, O.
2007 Balanced bilinguals have one Intertwined Phonological System. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 6–10 August 2007, 1865–1868.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. and L. Roberts
1959 Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, L. and Wiltshire, C.
2000 Pitch accent in Indian-English Teaching Discourse. World Englishes 191, 173–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Pitch accent in Indian English TAs’ Teaching Discourse. World Englishes, 191:173–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B.
1980 The Phonetics and Phonology of English Intonation. PhD thesis, MIT. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Platt, J, Webber, H. and Ho M. L.
1984 The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Puri, V.
2013 Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Rietveld, T, Kerkhoff, Gussenhoven, C.
2004 Word Prosodic Structure and Vowel Duration in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 321, 349–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shosted, R., Carignan, C., and Rong, P.
2012 Managing the Distinctiveness of Phonemic Nasal vowels: Articulatory Evidence from Hindi. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(1): 455–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simonet, M.
2008 Language Contact in Majorca: An Experimental Sociophonetic Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Singh, R.
2007 Reflections on English in India and Indian English (Target paper). Presented at the symposium on English in India and Indian English. Mysore: CIIL.Google Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S.
2006 Production of Coronal Stops by Simultaneous bilingual Adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L.
2007 Discrimination of Coronal Stops by Bilingual Adults: The timing and nature of language interaction. Cognition (2007).Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
1995 Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Toledo, G.
1989 Senales prosodicas del foco. Revista Argentina de Lingüística 5 (1–2): 205–230.Google Scholar
Ueyama, M. and Jun, Sun-Ah
1998 Focus realization in Japanese English and Korean English Intonation. In Hajime Hoji (a cura di), Japanese and Korean Linguistics 71. CSLI, Stanford University Press. 629–645.Google Scholar
Vella, A.
1995 Prosodic Structure and Intonation in Maltese: Influence on Maltese English. Ph D dissertation. Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Wells, W.
1986 An Experimental Approach to the Interpretation of Focus in Spoken English. In C. Johns-Lewis (Ed.). Intonation in Discourse. London: Croom Helm. 53–75.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, C. R., and Harnsberger, J. D.
2006 The Influence of Gujarati and Tamil L1s on Indian English: a preliminary study. World Englishes 251, 91–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiltshire, C. and Moon, R.
2003 Phonetic Stress in Indian English vs. American English. World Englishes, 22(3), 291–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. and Xu, C. X.
2005 Phonetic Realization of Focus in English Declarative Intonation. Journal of Phonetics 331, 159–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y.
2011 Post-focal Compression: Cross Linguistic Distribution and Historical Comparison. ICPhS XVII: Hong Kong, 17–21.Google Scholar