In a series of five experiments with 31 Korean heritage children, we show that knowledge of case and the ability to use it must be evaluated with careful attention to multiple factors that can influence access to morphological information in the course of comprehension and production. The first two experiments, which compared the canonical SOV pattern with the non-canonical OSV pattern, employed picture-selection comprehension tasks to assess knowledge of case. Poor performance on OSV sentences was mitigated by experimental manipulations that either enhanced the perceptual salience of case or provided felicitous conditions for the use of non-canonical word order. The next three experiments, all involving production tasks, revealed that many children who failed to demonstrate knowledge of case in the comprehension tasks actually produced nominative and accusative case correctly, thereby revealing their knowledge of this morphosyntactic system.
Bader, M., & Bayer, J. (2006). Case and linking in language comprehension: Evidence from German. New York: Springer.
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39 (3–4), 129–181.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2008). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences.
Bolonyai, A.2007. (In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 111, 3–21.
Cho, S. W. (1981). The acquisition of word order in Korean. MA thesis, the University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Choo, M., & Kwak, H.-Y. (2008). Using Korean. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chung, G. N. (1994). Case and its acquisition in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Clark, E., & Hecht, B. (1983). Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 341, 325–349.
Ellis, N. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 271, 164–194.
Fenyvesi, A. (2000). The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In A. Fenyvesi & K. Sándor (Eds.) Language contact and the verbal complex of Dutch and Hungarian: Working papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact, pp. 94–107. Szeged, Hungary: JGyTF Press.
Goldschneider, J., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 511, 1–50.
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 141, 23–45.
Hendriks, P. (2013). Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. New York: Springer.
Hendriks, P., & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language. Lingua, 1201, 1887–1897.
Hopp, H. (2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 (4), 463–483.
Hwang Jackson, K. (2008). The effect of information structure on Korean scrambling. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
Jin, K.-s., Kim, M. J., & Song, H.-j. (2015). The development of Korean preschoolers’ ability to understand transitive sentences using case-markers. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28 (3), 75–90.
Kim, K. (2014). Unveiling linguistic competence by facilitating performance. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
Kim, Y.-j. (1997). The acquisition of Korean. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 41), pp. 335–443. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kwon, N., Polinsky, M., & Kluender, R. (2006). Subject preference in Korean. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 1–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Kwon, S.-n., & Zribi-Hertz, A. (2008). Differential function marking, cases, and information structure: Evidence from Korean. Language, 841, 258–299.
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C., & Cho, S. W. (2009). Acquisition of the subject and topic nominals and markers in the spontaneous speech of young children in Korean. In C. Lee, G. Simpson & Y. Kim (Eds.), The handbook of Korean psycholinguistics, pp. 23–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H. (2006a). Effects of focus and markedness hierarchies on object case ellipsis in Korean. Discourse and Cognition, 131, 205–231.
Lee, H. (2006b). Parallel optimization in case systems: Evidence from case ellipsis in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 151, 69–96.
Love, T., Walenski, M., & Swinney, D. (2009). Slowed speech input has a differential impact on on-line and off-line processing in children’s comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 381, 285–304.
Montrul, S. (2010). Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 301, 3–23.
Montrul, S. (2013). Structural changes in three heritage languages. Invited talk. Radboud University Languages in Contact, De Leeuwenhorst, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, January 23, 2013.
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (2009). Back to basics: Differential Object Marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 (3), 363–383.
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M. (2010). Is grammar instruction beneficial for heritage language learners? Dative case marking in Spanish. The Heritage Language Journal 7 (1), 47–73.
National Institute of the Korean Language. (2002). Hyentay kwuke sayong pinto cosa [Investigation of word frequency on the contemporary Korean language]. Seoul: National Institute of the Korean Language.
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, O.-S., & Lee, M. (2011). An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 331, 223–245.
Polinsky, M. (1997). Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 14 (1–2), 87–123.
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 141, 192–265.
Polinsky, M. (2008a). Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers’ knowledge of noun categorization. The Heritage Language Journal, 6 (1), 40–71.
Polinsky, M. (2008b). Heritage language narratives. In D. Brinton, O. Kagan, & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage Language Education. A New Field Emerging, pp. 149–164. New York: Routledge.
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (5), 368–95.
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface strategies: Reference-set computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sekerina, I. (2003). Scrambling and processing: Complexity, dependencies, and constraints. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word order and scrambling, pp. 301–324. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Song, H.-S., & Schwartz, B. D. (2009). Testing the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis: L2 adult, L2 child, and L1 child comparisons in the acquisition of Korean wh-constructions with negative polarity items. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 323–361.
Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., & Lee, M. (1997). The learning and teaching of Korean in community schools. In Y.-H. Kim (Ed.), Korean language in America 21, pp. 111–127. Los Angeles: American Association of Teachers of Korean.
Sundara, M., Demuth, K., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Sentence-position effects on children’s perception and production of English third person singular -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 541, 55–71.
Unsworth, S. (2007). L1 and L2 acquisition between sentence and discourse: Comparing production and comprehension. Lingua, 1171, 1930–1958.
Hao, Jiuzhou, Vasiliki Chondrogianni & Patrick Sturt
2024. Heritage language development and processing: Non-canonical word orders in Mandarin–English child heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 27:3 ► pp. 334 ff.
Hwang, Haerim
2024. Development of morphological diversity in second language Korean: An NLP analysis using the Korean Morphological Richness Analyzer 1.0. System 121 ► pp. 103260 ff.
Katsika, Kalliopi, Maria Lialiou & Shanley E. M. Allen
2024. What eye and hand movements tell us about expectations towards argument order: An eye- and mouse-tracking study in German. Acta Psychologica 246 ► pp. 104241 ff.
Shin, Gyu-Ho
2024. Good-enough processing, home language proficiency, cognitive skills, and task effects for Korean heritage speakers’ sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 15
Daskalaki, Evangelia, Adriana Soto-Corominas, Aisha Barisé, Johanne Paradis, Xi Chen & Alexandra Gottardo
2023. The interplay between syntactic and morphological comprehension in heritage contexts: The case of relative clauses in heritage Syrian Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:6 ► pp. 1043 ff.
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl, Hyeree Choo, Ana Zappa, Julia Herschensohn, Seung-Kyung Kim, Alain Ghio & Sungryung Koh
2022. The Online Processing of Korean Case by Native Korean Speakers and Second Language Learners as Revealed by Eye Movements. Brain Sciences 12:9 ► pp. 1230 ff.
Arechabaleta Regulez, Begoña & Silvina Montrul
2021. Psycholinguistic Evidence for Incipient Language Change in Mexican Spanish: The Extension of Differential Object Marking. Languages 6:3 ► pp. 131 ff.
Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova
2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 545 ff.
Ionin, Tania
2021. Semantics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 668 ff.
Meir, Natalia & Bibi Janssen
2021. Child Heritage Language Development: An Interplay Between Cross-Linguistic Influence and Language-External Factors. Frontiers in Psychology 12
2021. Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 579 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Erratum
1 Feb 2017: Due to an error in production, the version published online on 13 Jan 2017 did not include all the corrections from the proofreading stage. These corrections have now been implemented in the version that is currently online.