Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 9:3 (2019) ► pp.376–397

Listener-adapted speech

Bilinguals adapt in a more sensitive way

| University of Cambridge
ORCID logo | University of Cambridge
While a significant amount of research has focussed on whether bilingualism bestows advantages in cognitive skills, perspective-taking and Theory of Mind, less is known about the effect of bilingualism in communicative tasks where these and related skills may be called for. This study examines bilingual and monolingual adults’ communicative skills through their production of two types of listener-adapted speech (LAS): child-directed speech and foreigner-directed speech. 20 monolinguals and 20 bilingual adults were asked to explain a cooking recipe to a child, a non-native adult and a control native adult. Participants adapted their speech for the child and the foreigner compared to the native adult. Furthermore, bilinguals adapted some features of their speech to a greater extent and in a fine-tuned way (wider pitch range addressing the child and vowel hyperarticulation addressing the foreigner). The prevalence of these features in bilingual speech was not correlated with personality or cognitive measures. We discuss possible sources of this difference in speech adaptation and implications for theories of bilingual cognition.
Keywords: bilingualism, listener-adapted speech, pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Material
    • 2.3Confederates
    • 2.4Dependent variables
      • Content measures
        • Number of additional words (NAW)
        • Number of target modifiers used (M)
        • Number of optional modifiers used (OM)
        • Mean Length of Utterance (MLU)
        • Changes (Ca)
        • Repetitions (R)
      • Acoustic measures
        • Mean pitch (MP)
        • Pitch range (PR)
        • Syllables per second (SPS)
        • Vowel triangle area (TR)
    • 2.5Language background and personality questionnaires
  • 3.Procedure
    • 3.1LAS task
    • 3.2Perspective-taking task
    • 3.3Color-shape challenge
    • 3.4Coding
      • 3.4.1Coding of the content
      • 3.4.2Coding of the acoustic correlates
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1LAS
    • 4.2Personality and cognitive variables
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16054.lor
References (65)
References
Allison, C., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(2), 202–212.e7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antón, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., Estévez, A., Hernández, J. A., Castillo, A., Fuentes, L. J., … Carreiras, M. (2014). Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, K., Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., & Katsos, N. (2014). Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills. In BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 11, pp. 12–24). Cascadilla Press Somerville, MA.Google Scholar
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingual Effects on Cognitive and Linguistic Development: Role of Language, Cultural Background, and Education. Child Development, 83(2), DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ben-Zeev, S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development, 48(3), 1009–1018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biersack, S., Biersack, S., Kempe, V., & Knapton, L. (2005). FineTuning Speech Registers: A Comparison of the Prosodic Features of Child-Directed and Foreigner-Directed Speech. In: Proceedings of the 9th European conference on speech communication and technology.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. (2002). Confluent talker- and listener-related forces in clear speech production. Mouton de Gruyter. Retrieved from [URL]
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2002). The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 272–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., McLean, J. F., & Brown, A. (2011). The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers. Cognition, 121(1), 41–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002). What’s new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science (New York, N.Y.), 296(5572), 1435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11(2), 282–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, G. H., & Caporael, L. R. (1983). Baby Talk Speech to the Elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(2), 305–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, B. M., & Coleman, L. M. (1986). Talking to children, foreigners, and retarded adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 945–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. -M., & van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2009). The effect of multilingualism/multiculturalism on personality: no gain without pain for Third Culture Kids? International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(4), 443–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. -M., & Wei, L. (2012). Multilingualism, empathy and multicompetence. International Journal of Multilingualism, 9(4), 352–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. -J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Hernández, J. A., Antón, E., Macizo, P., Estévez, A., Fuentes, L. J., & Carreiras, M. (2014). The Inhibitory Advantage in Bilingual Children Revisited. Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 234–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, S. P., Liberman, Z., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2015). The Exposure Advantage. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1090–1097. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farwell, C. B., Snow, C. E., & Ferguson, C. A. (1979). Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Language, 55(2), 449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register Snow, CE FergusonC. A. In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to Children. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1964). Baby Talk in Six Languages. American Anthropologist, 661 (6_PART2), 103–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 259–71. Retrieved from [URL]
Fernald, A. (1993). Approval and Disapproval: Infant Responsiveness to Vocal Affect in Familiar and Unfamiliar Languages. Child Development, 64(3), 657–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foltz, A., Gaspers, J., Thiele, K., Stenneken, P., & Cimiano, P. (2015). Lexical alignment in triadic communication. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallaway, C., & Richards, B. J. (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1975). Communication Skills of Bilingual Children. Child Development, 46(4), 1010–1014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goetz, P. J. (2003). The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman, M. C., Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2014). Are bilingual children better at ignoring perceptually misleading information? A novel test. Developmental Science, 17(6), 956–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, A., Bellana, B., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 28(1), 41–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and Reality. Sociolinguistic Studies, 61, 595–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2012). Bilingualism and Gesture. In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism (pp. 417–437). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, S., & Lee, K. (2013). Cognitive and Affective Perspective-Taking Ability of Young Bilinguals in South Korea. Child Studies in Diverse Contexts, 3(1), 69–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hazan, V., & Markham, D. (2004). Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3108–3118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hazan, V., & Baker, R. (2011). Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), 2139–2152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katsos, N., Grohmann, K. K., Kambanaros, M., & Antoniou, K. (n.d.). Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills. Retrieved from [URL]
Kemper, S., Finter‐Urczyk, A., Ferrell, P., Harden, T., & Billington, C. (1998). Using elderspeak with older adults. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 55–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kharkhurin, A. V. (2010). Kharkhurin: Bilingual verbal and nonverbal creativity Bilingual verbal and nonverbal creative behavior. International Journal of Bilingualism The International Journal of Bilingualisms, 14(142), 211–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoll, M., Uther, M., MacLeod, N., O’Neill, M., Walsh, S. (2006). Emotional, linguistic or just cute? The function of pitch contours in infant- and foreigner-directed speech. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
Kovács, A. M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6556–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (1997). Cross-Language Analysis of Phonetic Units in Language Addressed to Infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2017). Exposure to multiple languages enhances communication skills in infancy. Developmental Science, 20(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory. In Speech Production and Speech Modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangold, R., & Pobel, R. (1988). Informativeness and Instrumentality in Referential Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7(3–4), 181–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 81–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10(6), 719–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., Darrow, J., Dalibar, C., & Johnson, H. A. (2014). Effects of script similarity on bilingual advantages in executive control are likely to be negligible or null. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 232–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015a). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 691, 265–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 691, 265–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., & Remez, R. E. (2008). The Handbook of Speech Perception. In The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 1–708). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prato-Previde, E., Fallani, G., & Valsecchi, P. (2006). Gender Differences in Owners Interacting with Pet Dogs: An Observational Study. Ethology, 112(1), 64–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rondal, J. A. (1980). Fathers’ and mothers’ speech in early language development. Journal of Child Language, 7(2), 353–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P. (2016). The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P., & Glucksberg, S. (2012). Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 211–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryskin, R. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Yiu, L. K., & Nguyen, E. T. (2014). Visuospatial perspective-taking in conversation and the role of bilingual experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 741, 46–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, R., Brenier, J. M., Zhao, Y., Hall-Lew, L., & Dmitrieva, O. (2007). An acoustic study of real and imagined foreigner-directed speech. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, (August), 2165–2168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegal, M., Iozzi, L., & Surian, L. (2009). Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children. Cognition, 110(1), 115–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M. D., Janus, M., Moreno, S., Astheimer, L., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Early stage second-language learning improves executive control: Evidence from ERP. Brain and Language, 1391, 84–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication, 49(1), 2–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, S. (n.d.). Emotional, linguistic or just cute? The function of pitch contours in infant- and foreigner-directed speech. Retrieved from [URL]
Wassink, A. B., Wright, R. A., & Franklin, A. D. (2007). Intraspeaker variability in vowel production: An investigation of motherese, hyperspeech, and Lombard speech in Jamaican speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 351, 363–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2016). Children Increase Their Sensitivity to a Speaker’s Nonlinguistic Cues Following a Communicative Breakdown. Child Development, 87(2), 385–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Feng, Justin, Sohyun Cho & Gigi Luk
2023. Assessing Theory of Mind in bilinguals: A scoping review on tasks and study designs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lorge, Isabelle & Napoleon Katsos
2023. Monolingual and bilingual children’s performance learning words from ostensive teaching. Pragmatics & Cognition 30:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Lorge, Isabelle & Napoleon Katsos
2023. Bilingual children display comparative strength using prosodic cues for pragmatic word learning. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Rothermich, Kathrin, Rose Baker, Sharon M. Falkins, Jaeyoung Kum, Madison R. Capps & Susan C. Bobb
2023. Reported Use of Second-Language Speech Accommodation in Everyday Interactions: The Role of Individual Differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 66:9 ► pp. 3307 ff. DOI logo
Lovcevic, Irena, Denis Burnham & Marina Kalashnikova
2022. Infants’ Lexical Processing: Independent Contributions of Attentional and Clarity Cues. Language Learning and Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Piazza, Giorgio, Clara D. Martin & Marina Kalashnikova
2022. The Acoustic Features and Didactic Function of Foreigner-Directed Speech: A Scoping Review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:8 ► pp. 2896 ff. DOI logo
Sarvasy, Hannah S., Weicong Li, Jaydene Elvin & Paola Escudero
2022. Vowel acoustics of Nungon child-directed speech, adult dyadic conversation, and foreigner-directed monologues. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Kašćelan, Draško, Napoleon Katsos & Jenny L. Gibson
2019. Relations Between Bilingualism and Autistic-Like Traits in a General Population Sample of Primary School Children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49:6 ► pp. 2509 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.