Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 8:3 (2018) ► pp.393–409

Constructively combining languages

The use of code-mixing in German-English bilingual child language acquisition

| University of Leipzig
| University of Manchester
| Tilburg University
| Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology | Duke University
Language development in bilingual children is often related to differing levels of proficiency. Objective measurements of bilingual development include for example mean length of utterance (MLU). MLU is almost always calculated for each language context (including both monolingual and code-mixed utterances). In the current study, we analyzed the MLUs of three German-English bilingual children, aged 2;3–3;11 separately for the monolingual and code-mixed utterances. Our results showed that language preference was reflected in MLU values: the more children spoke in one language the higher the MLU was in that language. However, it was the mixed utterances that had the highest MLU for all three children. We support the results with a construction type analysis and suggest a potential usage-based explanation for these results based on individual differences in each child’s developmental inventory of words and constructions.
Keywords: code-mixing, German – English, bilingual child, language proficiency, MLU
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • Language proficiency and code-mixing
    • Code-mixing and entrenchment – a usage-based suggestion
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Analysis
      • Syntactic completeness
  • 3.Results
    • Language proportion for each child
    • MLUs for Silvie, Lily and Fion
    • Syntactic complexity and construction types
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 20 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17008.qui
References (38)
References
Backus, A. M. (2015). A usage-based approach to codeswitching: The need for reconciling structure and function. Code-switching Between Structural and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 19–37. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bannard, C. and Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 191, 241–248. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2016). Dominance in bilingualism: Foundations of measurement, with insights from the study of handedness. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Jeanine Treffers-Daller (Eds), Language Dominance in Bilinguals. Issues of Measurement and Operationalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernardini, P., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Ivy Hypothesis. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 71, 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. London: George Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantone, Katja F. & Natascha Müller. 2008. Un nase or una nase? What gender marking within switched DPs reveals about the architecture of the bilingual language faculty. Lingua, 118(6). 810–826.Google Scholar
Cantone, K. N., Kupisch, T., Müller, K., & Schmitz, K. (2008). Rethinking language dominance. Linguistische Berichte 2151, 129–160.Google Scholar
Comeau, L., Genesee, F., & Lapaquette, L. (2003). The Modeling Hypothesis and child bilingual code-mixing. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(2), 113–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A., Bornstein, M. H. & Putnick, D. L. (2014). A bilingual-monolingual comparison of young children’s vocabulary size: Evidence from comprehension and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 351, 1189–1211. DOI logo).Google Scholar
Döpke, S. (1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language, 251, 555–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Language Learning Monograph Series. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. & Tracy, R. (1996). Bilingual bootstrapping. Linguistics, 341, 901–926. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., & Nicoladis, E. (2006). Bilingual acquisition. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 324–342). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jorschick, L.; Quick, Endesfelder A., Gläßer, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2011). German-English speaking children’s mixed NPs with ‘correct’ gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2): 173–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2008). Dominance, mixing, and cross-linguistic influence: On their relation in bilingual development. In, P. Guijarro-Fuentes, P. Larrañaga & J. Clibbens (Eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners (pp. 209–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 11. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2000). The bilingualism reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. M., Fernández Fuertes, R., Perales, S., Pérez-Tattam, R. & Spradlin, K. T. (2008). Gender and gender agreement in bilingual native and non-native grammars: A view from child and adult functional-lexical mixings. Lingua, 1181, 827–851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 481–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., Pine, J., Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 241, 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, G. & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 251, 605–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1984). Second Language Acquisition in Childhood. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Müller, N., L. Arnaus Gil, N. Eichler, J. Geveler, M. Hager, V. Jansen, M. Patuto, V. Repetto & A. Schmeißer. (2015). Code-Switching: Spanisch, Italienisch, Französisch. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B., Fernández, S., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, D. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 181, 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1979). Constraints on language mixing: Intrasentential codeswitching and borrowing in Spanish/English. Language, 551, 219–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quick, Endesfelder A., Lieven, E., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (first view). Identifying partially schematic units in the code-mixing of an English and German speaking child. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Quick, Endesfelder A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Mixed NPs in German-English and German-Russian bilingual children. In Robinson, Justyna A. and Monika Reif (Eds), Cognitive perspectives on bilingualism. Trends in Applied Linguistics (TAL). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. & Treffers-Daller, J. Eds. (2016). Language Dominance in Bilingual. Issues of Measurement and Operationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, S. (1994). Early morphology in Swedish as the weaker language in French-Swedish bilingual children. Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 91, 67–86.Google Scholar
Schmeißer, A., Hager, M., Arnaus Gil, L., Jansen, V., Geveler, J., Eichler, N., Patuto, M., & Müller, N. (2016). Related but different: The two concepts of language dominance and language proficiency. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Jeanine Treffers-Daller (Eds), Language Dominance in Bilinguals. Issues of Measurement and Operationalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, ed. (2017). Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: how we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. Boston: APA and Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasserscheidt, P. (2016): Construction Grammar and Code-Mixing. In Robinson, Justyna A. and Monika Reif (Eds), Cognitive perspectives on bilingualism. Trends in Applied Linguistics (TAL). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, V. and S. Matthews. 2006. Assessing language dominance in bilingual acquisition: a case for mean length utterance differentials. Language Assessment Quarterly. 3(2), 97–116 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Baird, Piret
2024. Building languages: Estonian–English two-year-old bilingual’s reliance on patterns in code-mixed utterances. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Blom, Elma, Gülşah Yazıcı, Tessel Boerma & Merel van Witteloostuijn
2024. A longitudinal study of Turkish-Dutch children’s language mixing in single-language settings: Language status, language proficiency, cognitive control and developmental language disorder. Cognitive Development 71 ► pp. 101481 ff. DOI logo
Barking, Marie, Ad Backus & Maria Mos
2022. Individual corpus data predict variation in judgments: testing the usage-based nature of mental representations in a language transfer setting. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan, Nikolas Koch & Antje Endesfelder Quick
2022. Cognitive Linguistics meets multilingual language acquisition: What pattern identification can tell us. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Jourdain, Morgane
2022. The emergence of Information Structure in child speech: the acquisition ofc’est-clefts in French. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Nikolas, Stefan Hartmann & Antje Endesfelder Quick
2022. Traceback and Chunk-Based Learning: Comparing Usage-Based Computational Approaches to Child Code-Mixing. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Sczepurek, Nina-Sophie, Suzanne P. Aalberse & Josje Verhagen
2022. Multilingual Children’s Motivations to Code-Switch: A Qualitative Analysis of Code-Switching in Dutch-English Bilingual Daycares. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 274 ff. DOI logo
Gaskins, Dorota, Maria Frick, Elina Palola & Antje Endesfelder Quick
2021. Towards a usage-based model of early code-switching: Evidence from three language pairs. Applied Linguistics Review 12:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Nikolas & Katharina Günther
2021. Transfer Phenomena in Bilingual Language Acquisition: The Case of Caused-Motion Constructions. Languages 6:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Dorota Gaskins, Oksana Bailleul, Maria Frick & Elina Palola
2021. A gateway to complexity: A cross-linguistic comparison of child bilingual speech. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:3 ► pp. 800 ff. DOI logo
Salleh, Rabiah Tul Adawiyah Mohamed, Bruno Di Biase & Satomi Kawaguchi
2021. Lexical and morphological development: A case study of Malay English bilingual first language acquisition. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.