Language bias and proficiency effects on cross-language activation
A comprehension and production comparison
Recent research proposes that language bias and proficiency modulate cross-language activation in comprehension and production, but it is unclear how they operate and whether they interact. This study investigates whether stress differences between Spanish-English cognates (material, final-syllable stress in Spanish) affect how native-English second-language-Spanish bilinguals recognize Spanish words (materia “subject/matter,” second-syllable stress in Spanish). In a Spanish-English eye-tracking experiment (and parallel production task), participants heard/produced trisyllabic Spanish targets with second-syllable stress (materia) and saw four orthographic words, including the target and a Spanish-English cognate competitor. Cross-language activation was examined by manipulating the stress of the cognate in English. In comprehension, English cognates with the same stress as the Spanish target (materia vs material) were predicted to cause more cross-language interference than English cognates with a different stress (litera “bunk bed,” vs literal), but the reverse pattern was expected in production. Participants were assigned to a Spanish-bias condition (20% of English (filler) items), or an English-bias condition (65% of English (filler) items). Results indicate that English cognates with the same stress as the Spanish target interfered with the recognition of the Spanish target only in the English-bias condition (but facilitated its production), while increasing Spanish proficiency helped reduce this cross-linguistic interference.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Experiment 1: Comprehension
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials
- 2.3Procedure
- 2.4Data analysis
- 2.5Results
- 2.6Discussion
- 3.Experiment 2: Production
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials
- 3.3Procedure
- 3.4Data analysis
- 3.5Results
- 3.6Discussion
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (68)
Baayen, R. H.
(
2008)
Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Processing (Vol. 21). Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(
2015)
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
.
Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V.
(
2011)
Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension.
Cognition, 118(2), 245–257.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(
2010) Praat: doing phonetics by computers. Retrieved from
[URL]
Brown, J. D.
(
1980)
Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests.
Modern Language Journal, 641, 311–317.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K.
(
2010)
Carpet or Cárcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 669–705.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H.
(
2009)
Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.
Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chee, M. W., Tan, E. W., & Thiel, T.
(
1999)
Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging.
The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 19(8), 3050–3056.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R.
(
2002)
Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners.
Language and Speech, 45(3), 207–228.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
(
2004)
Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners.
Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I.
(
2006)
How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Desmet, T., & Duyck, W.
(
2007)
Bilingual language processing.
Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 168–194.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Desroches, A. S., Newman, R. L., & Joanisse, M. F.
(
2009)
Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 211, 1893–1906.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dijkstra, T.
(
2005)
Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In
B. MacWhinney,
J. F. Kroll, &
A. M. de Groot (Eds.),
Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp. 179–201).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dijkstra, T., & van Hell, J. G.
(
2003)
Testing the Language Mode Hypothesis Using Trilinguals.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(1), 2–16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián, N., Martí, M. A., & Carreiras, M.
(
2013)
EsPal: one-stop shopping for Spanish word properties.
Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duffau, H.
(
2008)
The anatomo-functional connectivity of language revisited. New insights provided by electrostimulation and tractography.
Neuropsychologia, 46(4), 927–934.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flege, J. E.
(
1987)
A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 81, 162–177.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García-Pentón, L., Pérez Fernández, A., Iturria-Medina, Y., Gillon-Dowens, M., & Carreiras, M.
(
2014)
Anatomical connectivity changes in the bilingual brain.
NeuroImage, 841, 495–504.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golestani, N., Alario, F. X., Meriaux, S., Le Bihan, D., Dehaene, S., & Pallier, C.
(
2006)
Syntax production in bilinguals.
Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1029–1040.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, L.-A. R.
(
2004)
What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and tagalog-English bilinguals.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 246–269.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C.
(
2008)
More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis.
Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787–814.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grainger, J., & Beauvillain, C.
(
1987)
Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, D.
(
1998)
Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 67–81.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guo, T., & Peng, D.
(
2006)
Event-related potential evidence for parallel activation of two languages in bilingual speech production.
Neuroreport, 17(17), 1757–1760.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hallett, P. E.
(
1986)
Eye movements. In
K. R. Boff,
L. I. Kaufman, &
J. P. Thomas (Eds.),
Handbook of perception and human performance (p. 10.1–10.112). New York: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanulová, J., Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P.
(
2011)
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 902–934.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M.
(
2007)
The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search.
Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 460–482.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. R.
(
2001)
ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 169–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Haji, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., … Kawashima, R.
(
2007)
Effect of syntactic similarity on cortical activation during second language processing: A comparison of English and Japanese among native Korean trilinguals.
Human Brain Mapping, 28(3), 194–204.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ju, M., & Luce, P.
(
2004)
Falling on Sensitive Ears: Constraints on Bilingual Lexical Activation.
Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, D., Watkins, K. E., Zatorre, R. J., & Milner, B.
(
2006)
Word and nonword repetition in bilingual subjects: A PET study.
Human Brain Mapping, 27(2), 153–161.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, B., & Christensen, H.
(
2016)
Tests in linear mixed effects models.
Version 2.0.32.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
(
2013a)
Interlingual competition in a spoken sentence context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review2, 201, 963–972.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
(
2013b)
The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2, 16(3), 508–517.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
(
2012)
Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English.
Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A.
(
2009)
Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linck, J. A., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F.
Luce, P. A, & Pisoni, D. B.
(
1998)
Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.
Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.
(
2003)
Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.
(
2003a)
Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.
(
2003b)
Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(
1987)
Functional parallelism in spoken.
Cognition, 251, 71–102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martínez-García, M. T., Van Anne, K., Brown, R., & Tremblay, A.
n.d.).
English and Spanish Listeners’ Use of “Positive” Stress cues in Spanish Word Recognition.
Martino, J., Brogna, C., Robles, S. G., Vergani, F., & Duffau, H.
(
2010)
Anatomic dissection of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus revisited in the lights of brain stimulation data.
Cortex, 46(5), 691–699.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClelland, J. L., Elman, J. L.
(
1986)
The TRACE Model of Speech Perception.
Cognitive Psychology, 181, 1–86.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A.
(
1999)
Bilingual Language Switching in Naming : Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection.
Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 25–40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S.
(
2008)
Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.
Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N.
(
2016)
The influence of second language proficiency on bilingual parallel language activation in Hindi – English bilinguals.
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 59111(
April), 1–16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mohades, S. G., Struys, E., Van Schuerbeek, P., Mondt, K., Van De Craen, P., & Luypaert, R.
(
2012)
DTI reveals structural differences in white matter tracts between bilingual and monolingual children.
Brain Research, 14351, 72–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R.
(
2000)
Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 631, 250–264.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perani, D., Abutalebi, J., Paulesu, E., Brambati, S., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F.
(
2003)
The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency.
Human Brain Mapping, 19(3), 170–182.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. a.
(
1997)
Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English.
Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schulpen, B., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H. J., & Hasper, M.
(
2003)
Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition.
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance (Vol. 291).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F.
(
2006)
Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context.
Journal of Memory and Language2, 55(2), 197–212.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M.
(
1982)
Automatic Access of the Meanings of Ambiguous Words in Context : Some Limitations of Knowledge-Based Processing.
Cognitive Psychology, 141, 489–537.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G.
(
2004)
The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words.
Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 381–398.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soares, C., & Grosjean, F.
(
1984)
Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: the effect on lexical access.
Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 380–386.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Galles, N., & Cutler, A.
(
2001)
Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access.
Journal of Memory and Language, 451, 412–432.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V.
(
1999)
Cross Talk Between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon.
Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tagliaferri, B.
(
2005)
Paradigm. Perception Research Systems, Inc. Retrieved from
[URL]
Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I.
(
2011)
Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.
(
1996)
The development of fluency in advanced learners of French.
Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tremblay, A.
(
2008)
Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 553–584.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tremblay, A., & Ransijn, J.
(
2015)
Model selection and post-hoc analysis for (G)LMER Models. R software package.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, A., & Cutler, A.
(
2004)
Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition.
Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, A., Melinger, A., Lara Tapia, L.
(
2007)
The mapping of phonetic information to lexical representation in Spanish: Evidence from eye movements. In
J. Trouvain &
W. J. Barry (Eds.)
Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007). Dudweiler: Pirrot (pp. 1941–1944).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Lijewska, Agnieszka & Robertus de Louw
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.