Article published in:Psycholinguistic approaches to production and comprehension in bilingual adults and children
Edited by Maialen Iraola Azpiroz, Shanley E.M. Allen, Kalliopi Katsika and Leigh Fernandez
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:4/5] 2019
► pp. 628–658
Dominance, mode, and individual variation in bilingual speech production and perception
Early Spanish-English bilinguals and English controls were tested on the production and perception of negative, short-lag, and long-lag Voice Onset Time (VOT), VOT types spanning the Spanish and English phonetic categories: phonologically, negative and short-lag VOT stops are distinct phonemes in Spanish, but realizations of voiced stops in English. Dominance was critical: more English-dominant bilinguals produced more short-lag VOT stops in response to negative VOT stimuli, and were also less accurate than more balanced bilinguals at discriminating negative from short-lag VOT. Bilinguals performed similarly to monolinguals overall, but they produced more negative VOT tokens and shorter short-lag VOT in response to negative VOT. Their productions were also less well correlated with perception and showed more variation between individuals. These results highlight the variable nature of bilingual production and perception, and demonstrate the need to consider language dominance, individual variation, as well as modalities and tasks when studying bilinguals.
Keywords: bilingualism, language dominance, language mode, voice onset time, English, Spanish
Published online: 09 October 2019
Abramson, A. S., & Whalen, D. H.
Balukas, C., & Koops, C.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
Beach, E. F., Burnham, D., & Kitamura, C.
(2017) Speech perception in phonetics. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Retrieved 2 Nov. 2017, from http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-62.
Best, C. T., & Strange, W.
Bills, G. D., Chávez, E. H., & Hudson, A.
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J.
Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L.
Dunn, A. L., & Fox Tree, J. E.
Elman, J. L., Diehl, R. L., & Buchwald, S. E.
Flege, J. E.
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W.
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Piske, T.
Fowler, C. A., Sramko, V., Ostry, D. J., Rowland, S. A., & Hallé, P.
Green, D. W.
Grijalva, C., Piccinini, P., & Arvaniti, A.
Keating, P. A.
Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E.
Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V.
Lipski, J. M.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S.
MacKay, I. R., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C.
Magloire, J., & Green, K. P.
(2010) A brief primer on experimental designs for speech perception research. Available at https://people.ucsc.edu/~gmcguir1/experiment_designs.pdf
Nakai, S., & Scobbie, J. M.
Olson, D. J.
Piccinini, P., & Arvaniti, A.
Raphael, L. J., Borden, G. J., & Harris, K. S.
Stuart-Smith, J., Sonderegger, M., Rathcke, T., & Macdonald, R.
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S.
Theodore, R. M., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D.
Cited by 2 other publications
Azpiroz, Maialen Iraola, Shanley E. M. Allen, Kalliopi Katsika & Leigh Fernandez
Kim, Ji Young & Gemma Repiso-Puigdelliura
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.