Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 10:4 (2020) ► pp.530–558

Acceleration and delay in bilingual, trilingual and multilingual German-Romance children

Finite verb placement in German

| Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany
| Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany
A production test with 91 bilingual, trilingual and multilingual children (who acquire more than three languages) elicited finite verbs in German. In comparison with monolinguals, the children were accelerated with respect to finite verb placement in main clauses. Following Biberauer & Richards (2006), the EPP feature of T can be satisfied in different ways across languages: If a DP is necessary, which is the case for adult German, it can either be raised from Spec,vP to Spec,TP (in which case the finite verb surfaces in non-clause-final position) or it is pied-piped to Spec,TP. In the latter case, the whole vP is placed in the specifier of TP, giving rise to V-final patterns. The bilingual, trilingual and multilingual children prefer Spec-raising to Spec-pied-piping. We argue that the choice of the means for EPP satisfaction in the German of the multilingual children is influenced by the respective Romance language (French/Spanish).
Keywords: early trilingualism, German finite verb placement, cross-linguistic influence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Finite verb placement in German
  • 3.Previous studies on the acquisition of finite verb placement in German
    • 3.1Main clauses
    • 3.2Subordinate clauses
  • 4.Cross-sectional study
    • 4.1Methodology
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Receptive vocabulary task PPVT
      • 4.1.3The Crazy-House-Test
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3A glance at German subordinate clauses
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17081.arn
References (38)
References
Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 161, 491–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, M., Bentzen, K. & Westergaard, M. (2010). Variation in the Input. Studies in the Acquisition of Word Order. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Arnaus Gil, L. & Müller, N. (2018). French postverbal subjects: A comparison of monolingual, bilingual, trilingual and multilingual French. Languages 3(3), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T. & Richards, M. (2006). True optionality: when grammar doesn’t mind. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), Minimalist Essays. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 35–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (2004). Toward a cartography of subject positions. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 115–165.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2013). Problems of projection. Lingua 1301, 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Problems of projection. Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S. & Penke, M. (1996). Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen & W. Rutherford (Eds.), Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition. Benjamins: Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 129–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Penke, M. & Parodi, T. (1993/1994). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition 31, 395–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H. (1983). On the interaction of roots transformations and lexical deletive rules. In W. Abraham (Ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 47–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M. (1959). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. American Guidance Service: Circle Pines, MN.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. American Guidance Service: Circle Pines, MN.Google Scholar
(1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Third Edition. American Guidance Service: Circle Pines, MN.Google Scholar
Freywald, U. (2013). Uneingeleiteter V1- und V2-Satz. In J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. & Tracy, R. (1996). Bilingual bootstrapping. Linguistics 341, 901–926. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, V. (2015). Dislokation im bilingualen Erstspracherwerb. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel deutsch-französischer Kinder. Berlin/München/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2006). The Acquisition of Determiners in Bilingual German-Italian and German-French Children. Lincom Europa: München.Google Scholar
Kauschke, C. (2013). The interrelation between lexical and grammatical abilities in early language acquisition. In S. Bartsch & D. Bittner (Eds.), Lexical Bootstrapping – the Role of Lexis and Semantics in Child Language Development. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, 143–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenhard, A., Lenhard, W., Segerer, R. & Suggate, S. (2015). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – 4. Edition. Pearson: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Liceras, J., Fernández Fuertes, R. & Alba de la Fuente, A. (2011). Overt subjects and copula omission in the Spanish and the English grammar of English-Spanish bilinguals. On the locus and directionality of interlinguistic influence. First Language 32(1–2), 88–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lubbers Quesada, M. & Blackwell, S. E. (2009). The L2 acquisition of null and overt Spanish subject pronouns: A pragmatic approach. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford & F. M. Marín (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, 117–130.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (eds) Bilingualism Across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 13–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(3), 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Different sources of delay and acceleration in early child bilingualism. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 36(1), 7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. & Hulk, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 181, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patuto, M., Repetto, V. & Müller, N. (2011). Delay and acceleration in bilingual first language acquisition: the same or different? In E. Rinke & T. Kupisch (Eds.), The Development of Grammar: Language Acquisition and Diachronic Change. Volume in Honor of Jürgen M. Meisel. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 231–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Repetto, V. & Müller, N. (2010). The acquisition of German V2 in bilingual Italian-German children residing in Germany and Italy: a case of acceleration? In V. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarró & J. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Movement and Clitics: Adult and Child Grammar. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 155–184.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Foris: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Residual Verb Second and the Wh-Criterion. In A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–90.Google Scholar
Rothweiler, M. (1993). Nebensatzerwerb im Deutschen. Eine Pilotstudie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Schmeißer, A. & Jansen, V. (2016). Finite verb placement in French language change and in bilingual German-French language acquisition. In K. Schmitz, P. Guijarro-Fuentes & N. Müller (Eds.), The Acquisition of French in its Different Constellations. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, 10–42.Google Scholar
Sette, N., M. Hüppop & L. Arnaus Gil (2018). Active bi- and trilingualism and its influencing factors. Submitted.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, A., N. Müller & L. Arnaus Gil (2018). Die Entwicklung des rezeptiven Wortschatzes bei bi-, tri- und multilingual aufwachsenden Kindern. Submitted.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M. (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua 1191, 460–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, H. (2013). Selbständige Verb-Letzt-Sätze. In J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 232–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Müller, Natascha
2023. AAiMLL: Acquisition Advantages in MultiLingual Learners: The Case of the Multilingual Child. Languages 9:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Natascha
2024. Chapter 5. Parameter setting in multilingual children with special reference to acceleration in French. In Language Acquisition in Romance Languages [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 18], ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Arnaus Gil, Laia, Natascha Müller, Nadine Sette & Marina Hüppop
2021. Active bi- and trilingualism and its influencing factors. International Multilingual Research Journal 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Scalise, Elena, Johanna Stahnke & Natascha Müller
2021. Parameter setting and acceleration. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 12:1 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Poeste, Meike, Natascha Müller & Laia Arnaus Gil
2019. Code-mixing and language dominance: bilingual, trilingual and multilingual children compared. International Journal of Multilingualism 16:4 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.