Article published in:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “Prosodic effects on L2 grammars”
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6] 2019
► pp. 769–808

Prosodic effects on L2 grammars

| McGill University
| McGill University
This paper provides an overview of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis (PTH), which accounts for certain difficulties that learners experience with L2 morphosyntax. We focus on inflection and articles, which have often been accounted for through defective syntactic representations or problems with the interface between morphology and syntax (inflection) and between semantics or discourse/pragmatics and syntax (articles). We argue that some problems in these domains reflect transfer of L1 prosodic constraints: certain forms cannot be prosodically represented as target-like and hence are omitted or mispronounced. We trace how the PTH has developed over time, from its initial instantiation as involving permanent L1 transfer, to currently, where L1 representations are seen as adaptable to the needs of the L2, and new representations can in fact be acquired. We provide an overview of work conducted in this framework and discuss how the theory has been extended beyond production to encompass comprehension and processing.
Keywords: prosodic transfer, articles, inflection, omission, substitution
Published online: 08 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19043.goa
References

References

Adams, K.
(2004, May). Variability in the perception of past tense -ed by L2 learners of English. Paper presented at SUNY/CUNY/NYU 5, Stony Brook, NY.
Austin, G., Chang, H., Kim, N., & Daly, E.
submitted). Prosodic transfer across constructions and domains in L2 inflectional morphology.
Bayley, R.
(1996) Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In R. Bayley & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 97–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. & Rohrbacher, B.
(1997) Features and projections: Arguments for the full competence hypothesis. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), BUCLD 21: Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 24–35). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(1986) EI muchacha tiene tres balon: Number and gender in the Spanish of a group of francophone learners (Master’s thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada).Google Scholar
Buckley, M.
(2005) Prosodic constraints and the syntax-phonology interface: The phonology of object clitics in L2 French. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 122–133). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Campos Dintrans, G., & Rothman, J.
(2018) The role of L1 phonology in L2 morphological production: L2 English past tense production by L1 Spanish, Mandarin, and Japanese speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 503–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charette, M.
(1991) Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M.
(1968) The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Liljestrand Fultz, A., & Petrush, R. A.
(2008) Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 453–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, F.
(1984) L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D., & Vergnaud, J.-R. (Eds.), Forme sonore du langage (pp. 65–122). Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Demuth, K.
(2014) Prosodic licensing and the development of phonological and morphological representations. In A. Farris-Trimble & J. Barlow (Eds.), Perspectives on phonological theory and development: In honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen (pp. 11–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, S.
(2000) The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M.
(1974) Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D.
(2005) Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 130–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanli, E. E.
(1984) The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Feldscher, C., & Durvasula, K.
(2017) Excrescent stops in American English. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 2, 20, 1–15.Google Scholar
Gerken, L.
(1996) Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language, 72, 683–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L., & McIntosh, B.
(1993) The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29, 448–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., Guzzo, N. B., & White, L.
submitted). Parsing ambiguous relative clauses in L2 English: Learner sensitivity to prosodic cues.
Goad, H., & White, L.
(2004) Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace, & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 4 (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
(2006) Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22, 243–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua, 118, 577–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y.-K. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., White, L., & Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(2011) Prosodic transfer at different levels of structure: The L2 acquisition of Spanish plurals. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Online Proceedings Supplement.Google Scholar
Goad, H., White, L., Garcia, G. D., Guzzo, N. B., Mortazavinia, M., Smeets, L., & Su, J.
(2018, September). Pronoun interpretation in L2 Italian: prosodic effects revisited. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA) 8, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J.
(2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 243–263.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J., & Rosen, S. T.
(1990) Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 187–222.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R.
(2000) Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 34, 75–90.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F.
(2004) Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp. 175–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S.
(2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. D.
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J., & Gess, R.
(2018) Acquisition of L2 French object pronouns by advanced anglophone learners. Languages, 3(2),15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T.
(1985) System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35, 141–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
(2012)  That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 28, 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
(2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C.
(2000) A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology (pp. 209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B., & Vogel, I.
(2001) The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 18, 315–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J.
(1990) ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology, 7, 301–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, J.
(2015) Second language acquisition of focus prosody in English and Spanish (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada).Google Scholar
Klein, E., Stoyneshka, I., Adams, K., Rose, T., Pugash, Y., & Solt, S.
(2004) Past tense affixation in L2 English: The effects of lexical aspect and perceptual salience. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Online Supplement.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J.
(1997) Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lamontagne, J., & Goad, H.
submitted). Weight and prominence in French: An examination of corpus data from a Laurentian variety.
Lardiere, D.
(1998) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2003) Second language knowledge of [±past] vs. [±finite]. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002): L2 Links (pp. 176–189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M.
(2013, January). The importance of comprehension to a rounded view of second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Department of Linguistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Lyons, C.
(1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J., & Prince, A.
(1995) Prosodic morphology. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 318–366). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I.
(1986) Prosodic phonology. Foris: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Öztürk, B.
(2005) Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Deshaies, D.
(1990) Rules of stress assignment in Québec French: Evidence from perceptual data. Language Variation and Change, 2, 135–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, L., & Ionin, T.
(2011) Perception of articles in L2 English. In L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2009 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 121–128). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Plag, I., Homann, J., & Kunter, G.
(2017) Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 181–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, A.-E., Goad, H., & Steinhauer, K.
(2011) Prosodic transfer: An event-related potentials approach. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul, & K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech, Vol II (pp. 217–225). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pugach, Y., Stoyneshka, I., Solt, S., & Klein, E.
(2004, May). L2 perception and production of the English past: The role of L1 and L2 phonology. Paper presented at SUNY/CUNY/NYU 5, Stony Brook, NY.
Robertson, D.
(2000) Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scullen, M. E.
(1997) French prosodic morphology: A unified account. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12: 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.
(1980) The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 563–605.Google Scholar
(1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shadle, C. H.
(2012) The acoustics and aerodynamics of fricatives. In A. Cohn, & M. K. Fougeron (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 511–526). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skrzypek, D.
(2009) The formation of the definite article in the Nordic languages. Lingua Posnaniensis, 51, 65–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snape, N., & Kupisch, T.
(2010) Ultimate attainment of second language articles: A case study of an endstate second language Turkish-English speaker. Second Language Research, 26, 527–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solt, S., Pugach, Y., Klein, E., Adams, K., Stoyneshka, I., & Rose, T.
(2004) L2 perception and production of the English regular past: Evidence of phonological effects. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 553–564). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A.
(1999) Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, L., & Ouellet, M.
(1996) Tonal distinctions between emphatic stress and pretonic lengthening in Quebec French. International Conference on Spoken Language Processing-1996, 2, 638–641.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D.
(2007) Variability in L2 article production – beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23, 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Mastropaviou, M.
(2007) Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 143–183). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ueyama, M.
(2000) Prosodic transfer: An acoustic study of L2 English vs. L2 Japanese (Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Underhill, R.
(1976) Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. & Jegerski, J.
(2010) Second language processing and parsing: The issues. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 129–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Some puzzling features of L2 features. In J. Liceras, H. Goodluck, & H. Zobl (Eds.), The role of features in second language acquisition (pp. 300–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2009) Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–68). Leeds, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
White, L., Goad, H., Su, J., Smeets, L., Mortazavinia, M., Garcia, G. D., & Guzzo, N. B.
(2017) Prosodic effects on pronoun interpretation in Italian. In M. LaMendola & J. Scott (Eds.), BUCLD 41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 744–752). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R.
(2004) A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 34–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zec, D.
(2005) Prosodic differences among function words. Phonology, 22, 77–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizaretta, M. L., & Nava, E.
(2011) Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua, 121, 652–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Archibald, John
2019. Types of evidence and the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 809 ff. Crossref logo
Austin, Gavin, Heejin Chang, Nayoung Kim & Eoin Daly
2021. Prosodic transfer across constructions and domains in L2 inflectional morphology. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism Crossref logo
Bañón, José Alemán, David Miller & Jason Rothman
2020. EXAMINING THE CONTRIBUTION OF MARKEDNESS TO THE L2 PROCESSING OF SPANISH PERSON AGREEMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Carroll, Susanne E.
2019. Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 827 ff. Crossref logo
Dehé, Nicole
2019. ‘Minimal adaptation’ and the edges of prosodic domains. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 833 ff. Crossref logo
Grijzenhout, Janet
2019. Phonology constrains morphology differently in developing L1, cL2, and L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 838 ff. Crossref logo
Hawkins, Roger
2019. Prosodic transfer and its relation to hypotheses of morphological development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 843 ff. Crossref logo
Henry, Nick, Carrie N Jackson & Holger Hopp
2020. Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German. Second Language Research ► pp. 026765832096315 ff. Crossref logo
Herschensohn, Julia & Randall Gess
2019. Transfer cost and the developmental path to target object clitic prosody. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 849 ff. Crossref logo
Leal, Tania & Jeffrey Renaud
2019. Better together. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 854 ff. Crossref logo
Matthews, John
2019. Prosodic transfer in the receptive modality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 862 ff. Crossref logo
Muntendam, Antje
2019. Possible extensions of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 867 ff. Crossref logo
Schiller, Niels O.
2019. Evidence for syntactic feature transfer between two languages. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 883 ff. Crossref logo
Özçelik, Öner
2019. The scope of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:6 ► pp. 878 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.