Aronoff, M.
(1976) Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baeskow, H.
(2004) Lexical properties of selected non-native morphemes of English. Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. E.
(2012) First exposure learners make use of top-down lexical knowledge when learning new words. In K. Braunmüller, C. Gabriel & B. Hänel-Faulhaber (Eds.), HSM13 Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies (pp. 23–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language. Second Language Research, 291, 131–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Processing ‘words’ in early stage SLA: A comparison of first exposure and early stage learners. In Z. H. Han & R. Rast (Eds.), First exposure to a second language acquisition (pp. 107–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E., & Hracs, L.
(2018) Inferring the meanings of words from visual and linguistic context: Word learning in absolute beginners. Research Methodology in the Field of Second Language Acquisition & Learning/Les méthodologies de la recherche dans le domaine de l’acquisition et de l’apprentissage des langues secondes. May 31 2018, Université de Paul-Valéry, Montpellier III, Montpellier France.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. E., & Widjaja, E.
(2013) Learning exponents of number on first exposure to an L2. Second Language Research, 291, 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E., & Windsor, J. W.
(2015) Segmental targets versus lexical interference: Production of second-language targets on first exposure with minimal training. In H. Peukert (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp. 53–85). HSLD4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Corson, D.
(1985) The lexical bar. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A.
(2012) Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M.
(1987) The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 21, 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finn, A., & Hudson Kam, K.
(2008) The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition, 1081, 477–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L.
(2019) Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J.
(2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 481, 243–263.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., and DeKeyser, R. M.
(2001) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 511, 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., & Indefrey, P.
(2010) Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60, Supplement 21, 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2002) Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenney, J.
(2017) Leaping the lexical bar. Blog. Accessed August 7, 2019. [URL]
Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
(1997) The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?), Second Language Research, 131, 301–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2005) New directions in the Competition Model. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 81–110). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Saffran, J., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. N.
(1996) Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 351, 606–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., and Ellis, N. C.
(2018) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar