Native language, L2 experience, and pitch processing in music
The current study investigated how the role of pitch in one’s native language and L2 experience influenced musical
melodic processing by testing Turkish and Mandarin Chinese advanced and beginning learners of English as an L2. Pitch has a lower
functional load and shows a simpler pattern in Turkish than in Chinese as the former only contrasts between presence and the
absence of pitch elevation, while the latter makes use of four different pitch contours lexically. Using the Musical Ear Test as
the tool, we found that the Chinese listeners outperformed the Turkish listeners, and the advanced L2 learners outperformed the
beginning learners. The Turkish listeners were further tested on their discrimination of bisyllabic Chinese lexical tones, and
again an L2 advantage was observed. No significant difference was found for working memory between the beginning and advanced L2
learners. These results suggest that richness of tonal inventory of the native language is essential for triggering a music
processing advantage, and on top of the tone language advantage, the L2 experience yields a further enhancement. Yet, unlike the
tone language advantage that seems to relate to pitch expertise, learning an L2 seems to improve sound discrimination in general,
and such improvement exhibits in non-native lexical tone discrimination.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Materials and methods
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials and procedure
- Musical Ear Test, the melodic aptitude test
- Memory tests
- Self-reported language skills and history questionnaire
- Music background questionnaire
- Lexical tone discrimination task
- 3.Statistical analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 5.General discussion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (45)
References
Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern
Cantonese phonology. Mouton de Gruyter.
Bhatara, A., Yeung, H. H., & Nazzi, T. (2015). Foreign language learning in french speakers is associated with rhythm perception, but not with melody perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 277–282.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual
minds. Psychological Science in the Public
Interest, 10(3), 89–29.
Bidelman, G., Gandour, J., & Krishnan, A. (2011). Cross-domain
effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory
brainstem. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 231, 425–434.
Bidelman, G., Hutka, S., & Moreno, S. (2013). Tone
language speakers and musicians share enhanced perceptual and cognitive abilities for musical pitch: Evidence for
bidirectionality between the domains of language and music. Plos
One, 81, e60676.
Bradley, E. D. (2016). Phonetic dimensions of tone language effects on musical melody perception. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26(4), 337.
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training
Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and
production. Perception &
Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985.
Callan, A. M., Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Kubo, R., Masaki, S., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2003). Learning-induced
neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic
contrast. Neuroimage, 19(1), 113–124.
Chen, A., Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2016). Cross-domain
correlation in pitch perception, the influence of native language. Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience, 31(6), 751–760.
Chen, A., Peter, V., Wijnen, F., Schnack, H., & Burnham, D. (2018). Are
lexical tones musical? native language’s influence on neural response to pitch in different
domains. Brain and
Language, 180–1821, 31–41.
Delogu, F., Lampis, G., & Belardinelli, M. O. (2006). Music-to-language
transfer effect: May melodic ability improve learning of tonal languages by native nontonal
speakers? Cognitive
Processing, 7(3), 203–207.
Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., Marvin, E., & Xu, H. (2006). Absolute
pitch among American and Chinese conservatory students: Prevalence differences, and evidence for a speech-related critical
period. Journal of Acoustic Society of
America, 119(2), 719–722.
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects
of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of
Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.
Gandour, J., & Harshman, R. (1978). Cross-language
difference in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and
Speech, 211, 1–33.
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone
perception in far eastern languages. Journal of
Phonetics, 111, 149–176.
Garbin, G., Costa, A., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Ventura, N., … Ávila, C. (2011). Neural bases of language switching in high and early proficient bilinguals. Brain and Language, 119(3), 129–135.
Kempe, V., Bublitz, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2015). Musical
ability and non-native speech-sound processing are linked through sensitivity to pitch and spectral
information. British Journal of
Psychology, 106(2), 349–366.
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(8), 599–605.
Krizman, J., Marian, V., Shook, A., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical
encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function
advantages. Proceedings of National Academy of Science
USA, 109(20), 7877. Retrieved
from [URL].
Lee, C. Y., & Hung, T. H. (2008). Identification
of mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of
America, 1241, 3235–3248.
Levi, S. V. (2005). Acoustic
correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic
Association, 35(1), 73–97.
Li, C., & Thompson, S. A. (1989). Mandarin
Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training
Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. long-term retention of new phonetic
categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 96(4), 2076–2087.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Margarita, K. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967.
Marie, C., Delogu, F., Lampis, G., Belardinelli, M., & Besson, M. (2011). Influence
of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in mandarin Chinese. Journal of
Cognitive
Neuroscience, 231, 2701–2715.
Mechelli, A., Crinion, J. T., Noppeney, U., O’Doherty, J., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Price, C. J. (2004). Structural
plasticity in the bilingual
brain. Nature, 431(7010), 757.
Milovanov, R., Huotilainen, M., Välimäki, V., Esquef, P. A. A., & Tervaniemi, M. (2008). Musical
aptitude and second language pronunciation skills in school-aged children: Neural and behavioral
evidence. Brain
Research, 11941, 81–89.
Mok, P. K. P., & Zuo, D. (2012). The separation between music and speech: Evidence from the perception of cantonese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(4), 2711–2720.
Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker
normalization in the perception of mandarin chinese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical
Society of
America, 102(3), 1864–1877. Retrieved
from [URL].
Osterhout, L., Poliakov, A., Inoue, K., McLaughlin, J., Valentine, G., Pitkanen, I., … Hirschensohn, J. (2008). Second-language
learning and changes in the brain. Journal of
Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 509–521.
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There
is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive
Psychology, 66(2), 232–258.
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual
advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined
circumstances. Cortex, 691, 265–278.
Pfordresher, P., & Brown, S. (2009). Enhanced
production and perception of musical pitch in tone language speakers. Attention, Perception and
Psychophysics, 71(-6), 1385–1398.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The
phonology and phonetics of English intonation. [Doctoral
dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Bouwer, F. L., & Honing, H. (2018). Decision making strategy and the simultaneous processing of syntactic dependencies in language and music. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 38.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Roor, D., Chen, A., & Sadakata, M. (2016). The enhanced musical rhythmic perception in second language learners. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 101, 288.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Heine, A., Vuust, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Enhanced musical rhythmic perception in turkish early and late learners of german. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 645.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Speech rhythm facilitates syntactic ambiguity resolution: ERP evidence. Plos One, 8(2), e56000.
Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When
does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of
Aging, 30(4), 507–514.
Schellenberg, E. G. (2015). Music
training and speech perception: A gene-environment interaction. Annals of the New York Academy
of Sciences, 13371, 170–177.
Schlegel, A. A., Rudelson, J. J., & Tse, P. U. (2012). White
matter structure changes as adults learn a second language. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 24(8), 1664–1670.
Shaefer, V., & Darcy, I. (2014). Lexical
function of pitch in the first language shapes cross-linguistic perception of Thai
tones. Laboratory
Phonology, 51, 489–522.
Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual
differences in second-language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological
Science, 17(8), 675–681.
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C., & Vuust, P. (2010). The
musical ear test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual
Differences, 20(3), 188–196.
Wong, C. M. P., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical
experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature
Neuroscience, 101, 420–422.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Sun, Bo, Juan Yang & Zhijie Liang
2024.
How music facilitates second language (L2) learning: a systematic review from 2002 to 2022.
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching ► pp. 1 ff.
Jabeen, Farhat & Bettina Braun
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.