Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 12:3 (2022) ► pp.251–279

To hón ich imma insistieat

Syntactic stability in heritage Hunsrückisch German spoken in Brazil

ORCID logo | Universiy of Minho
| Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
| Universiy of Minho | Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
This paper investigates syntactic variation in Hunsrückisch German, spoken in a language enclave in South Brazil over eight generations. The aim is to analyse whether this heritage language maintains asymmetric verb placement, i.e. verb-second in main clauses and verb-final in subordinate clauses, a prominent syntactic feature of German varieties. The analysis is based on a sample of 5000 sentences, produced by participants belonging to two generations of Hunsrückisch speakers: 10 older speakers (age: 55–75), and 10 younger adults (age: 25–40). The results show a general stability of asymmetric verb placement in both speaker groups, as has also been observed for other German language islands. This stability is a consequence of the active use of this minority language, not only by the older, but also by the younger generation of speakers, who are dominant in Brazilian Portuguese (BP). Variation to verb-second and verb-final order is conditioned by the same factors as in colloquial and dialectal German, and cannot be attributed to cross-linguistic influence from BP.
Keywords: Hunsrückisch, language island, Heritage German, verb placement, syntactic stability
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hunsrückisch – a German heritage language in South Brazil
  • 3.Asymmetric verb placement in standard German and dialectal varieties
  • 4.On (un)stable heritage grammars and contact-induced diachronic change
  • 5.The present study
    • 5.1The speakers
    • 5.2Data collection and corpus
    • 5.3Research questions
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Verb placement in declarative main clauses
    • 6.2Verb placement in subordinate clauses
    • 6.3Verb clusters
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20041.flo
References (73)
References
Abraham, W. (2009). Methodological considerations on grammar variation. The right periphery as an OV/VO deciding parameter more so than the left periphery: Gradience in the verb cluster. In A. Dufter, J. Fleischer, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar (pp. 21–58). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011). Spoken syntax in Cimbrian of the linguistic islands in Northern Italy – and what they (do not) betray about language universals and change under areal contact with Italo-Romance. In M. Putnam (Ed.), Studies in German-language islands (pp. 233–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenhofen, C. (1996). Hunsrückisch in Rio Grande do Sul. Ein Beitrag zur Beschreibung einer deutschbrasilianischen Dialektvarietät im Kontakt mit dem Portugiesischen. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ambar, M. (1992). Para uma Sintaxe da Inversão Sujeito Verbo em Português. Lisbon: Colibri.Google Scholar
Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2006). North American Icelandic: The Life of a Language. Mani-toba: The University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Au, T. K., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S. A., & Romo, L. F. (2008). Salvaging a Childhood Language. Journal of memory and language, 58(4), 998–1011. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. (1993). Zur Verbspitzenstellung im gesprochenen Deutsch. Deutsche Sprache, 231, 193–222.Google Scholar
Bader, M., & Schmid, T. (2009). Verb clusters in colloquial German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 121, 175–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 391, 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besten, H. den. (1983). On the interaction between root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In W. Abraham (Ed.), On the formal syntax of the West Germania (pp. 47–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. (2009). The life and death of Texas German. Durham: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Bousquette, J. (2015). An early stage of the historical development of complementizer agreement: Evidence from Wisconsin Heritage German. In B. Page & M. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic heritage languages in North America: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings (pp. 34–63). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bousquette, J., & Putnam, M. T. (2020). Redefining language death: Evidence from moribund grammars. Language Learning, 701, 188–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M. (2003). Dynamics of language contact. English and immigrant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damke, C. (1997). Sprachgebrauch und Sprachkontakt in der deutschen Sprachinsel in Südbrasilien. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dubenion-Smith, S. (2010). Verbal complex phenomena in West Central German: Empirical domain and multi-causal account. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 22(2), 99–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Andrade Berlinck, R. (2000). Brazilian Portuguese VS order: A diachronic analysis. In M. Kato & E. Negrão (Eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the null subject parameter (pp. 175–194). Frankfurt: Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, K. M., & Hjelde, A. (2015). Verb Second and Finiteness Morphology in Norwegian Heritage Language of the American Midwest. In R. Page & M. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic heritage languages in North America: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings (pp. 64–101). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Evers, A. (1975). The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Featherston, S. (2004). Bridge verbs and V2 verbs – the same thing in spades? Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 231, 181–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, J., & Schallert, O. (2011). Historische Syntax des Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Flores, C. (2008). A competência sintáctica de falantes bilingues luso-alemães regressados a Portugal. Um estudo sobre erosão linguística [The syntactic competence of Portuguese-German bilingual returnees from Portugal. A study on language attrition]. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho, Portugal.Google Scholar
(2010). The effect of age on language attrition: Evidence from bilingual returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(4), 533–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, C., Rinke, E., & Azevedo, C. (2017). Object realization across generations. A closer look on the spontaneous speech of Portuguese first and second generation migrants. In E. Domenico (Ed.), Complexity in Acquisition (pp. 178–205). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Frey, W. (2005). Zur Syntax der linken Peripherie im Deutschen. Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie, 1471, 171.Google Scholar
Freywald, U. (2016). V2-Nebensätze – ein eigener Satztyp? In R. Finkbeiner & J. Meibauer (Eds.), Satztypen und Konstruktionen (pp. 326–372). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. M. (2001). Are there V2 relative clauses in German? Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 31, 97–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, G., & Poletto, C. (2005). Von OV zu VO: Ein Vergleich zwischen Zimbrisch und Plodarisch. In E. Bidese, J. R. Dow, & T. Stolz (Eds.), Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch (pp. 114–128). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, G. (1988). Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L., & H. van Riemsdijk. (1986). Verb Projection Raising, Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 417–466.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2013). Verb second. In T. Kiss, & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), Syntax – An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research. 2nd Edition (pp. 343–384). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopp, H., & Putnam, M. (2015). Syntactic restructuring in heritage grammars: Word order variation in Moundridge. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(2), 180–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. T. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B., & Salmons, J. (2015). The study of Germanic heritage languages in the Americas. Germanic heritage languages. In J. B. Johannessen, & J. Salmons (Eds.) Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2008). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and linguistics compass, 3(1), 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G. (2011). Looking for order in chaos Standard convergence and divergence. In M. Putnam (Ed.), Studies in German-language islands (pp. 187–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, W. (1974). Falares alemães no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.Google Scholar
Kühl, K., & Petersen, J. (2018). Word Order in American Danish Declaratives with a Non-Subject Initial Constituent. Journal of Language Contact, 11(3), 413–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 564–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsson, I., & Johannessen, J. (2015). Incomplete acquisition and verb placement in heritage Scandinavian. In R. Page & M. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Perspectives and empirical findings (pp. 153–189). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Louden, M. (2003). Minority language ‘maintenance by inertia’: Pennsylvania German among nonsectarian speakers. In J. K. Androutsopoulos & E. Ziegler (Eds.), Standardfragen: soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprachgeschichte, Sprachkontakt und Sprachvariation (pp. 121–137). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2011). Synchrony and diachrony of verb clusters in Pennsylvania Dutch. In M. Putnam (Ed.), Studies in German-language islands (pp. 165–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A. (1921). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Tome 1. Paris: Éditions Champion.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism Across the Life Span: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity, and Loss (pp. 13–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). First and second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). How similar are adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers? Spanish clitics and word order. Applied Psycholinguistics, 311, 167–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nützel, D., & Salmons, J. (2011). Language Contact and New Dialect Formation: Evidence from German in North America. Language and Linguistics Compass, 51, 705–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. (1985). A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 81, 49–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. (2019). The (in)stability of grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 275–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Why study Sprachinseln from generative or structural perspectives? Introductory remarks. In M. Putnam (Ed.), Studies in German-language islands (pp. 1–9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reich, I., & Horch, E. (2017). The Fragment Corpus(FraC). In Proceedings of the 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference. Birmingham/UK, 392–393.Google Scholar
Rinke, E., & Flores, C. (2014). Heritage Portuguese bilinguals’ morphosyntactic knowledge of clitics. Bilingualism. Language and Cognition, 171, 681–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Schaumloeffel, M. A. (2003). Estudo da Interferência do Português da Variedade Dialetal Hunsrück Falada em Boa Vista do Herval. Master dissertation, Universidade Federal do Paraná.Google Scholar
Schmid, T., & Vogel, R. (2004). Dialectal Variation in German 3-Verb Clusters. A Surface-Oriented Optimality Theoretic Account. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 71, 235–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sewell, A. (2015). Sociolinguistic and syntactic variation in Wisconsin German Narratives. In R. Page & M. T. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Perspectives and empirical findings (pp. 224–250). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1998). On borrowing as a mechanism of syntactic change. In A. Schwegler, B. Tranel, & M. Uribe-Etxebarria (Eds.), Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives: Selected Papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 225–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stahl Zilles, A. M. (2000). A Posposição do Sujeito ao Verbo no Português Falado no Rio Grande do Sul [The post-position of the Subject after the Verb in Portuguese spoken in Rio Grande do Sul]. Letras de Hoje, 35(1), 75–96.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. (2006). Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhmann, S. (1998). Verbstellungsvariation in weil-Sätzen. Lexikalische Differenzierung mit grammatischen Folgen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 171, 92–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veltman, C. (1983). Language Shift in the United States. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, S. (2020). The placement of finite verbs. In M. T. Putnam & B. R. Page (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Germanic linguistics (pp. 339–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, C. R. (2019). Mudança sintática em uma ilha linguística alemã sul-brasileira [Syntactic Change in a South Brazilian German language island]. Master dissertation, Universidade do Minho/Goethe Universität.Google Scholar
Weiß, H., & Schwalm, J. (2017). Verbcluster. In J. Fleischer, A. Lenz & H. Weiß (Eds.), SyHD-atlas. [URL]
Wilkerson, M., & Salmons, J. (2008). “GOOD old immigrants of yesteryear,” who didn’t learn English: Germans in Wisconsin. American Speech, 83(3), 259–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wöllstein, A. (Ed.) (2016). Duden – Die Grammatik. 9th Edition. Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. (2017). Verb Clusters, Verb Raising, and Restructuring. In M. Everaert & H. C. Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Rinke, Esther, Cristina Flores, Priscila Oliveira & Liliana Correia
2024. An experimental study on the loss of VS order in monolingual and bilingual speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 36:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Limberger, Bernardo Kolling
2023. Leitura de sentenças em alemão por falantes de hunsriqueano: acesso lexical não seletivo e coativação sintática. Diacrítica 36:1 DOI logo
Smith, Giuditta, Roberta Spelorzi, Antonella Sorace & Maria Garraffa
2023. Inter-generational attrition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Sopata, Aldona, Esther Rinke & Cristina Flores
2023. How unique is the linguistic situation of endangered language speakers?. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:1 ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.