Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.133–162

Variable V2 in Norwegian heritage language

An effect of crosslinguistic influence?

ORCID logo | UiT The Arctic University of Norway | NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
| NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology | UiT The Arctic University of Norway
ORCID logo | UiT The Arctic University of Norway
This paper discusses possible attrition of verb second (V2) word order in Norwegian heritage language by investigating a corpus of spontaneous speech produced by 50 2nd–4th generation heritage speakers in North America. The study confirms previous findings that V2 word order is generally stable in heritage situations, but nevertheless finds approximately 10% V2 violations. The cases of non-V2 word order are argued to be due to lack of activation of the heritage language grammar, making it vulnerable to crosslinguistic influence from the speakers’ dominant language. This crosslinguistic influence does not simply replace V2 by non-V2, but is argued to operate more indirectly, affecting (a) the distribution of contexts for V2 word order, and (b) introducing two new distinctions into the heritage language, one (indirectly) based on a similar distinction in the dominant language (a difference between adverbs and negation with respect to verb movement), the other based on frequency of initial elements triggering V2 in non-subject-initial declaratives. Together, these findings also indicate that crosslinguistic influence affects different contexts of V2 differently, providing support for analyses that treat V2 word order as the result of many smaller rules.
Keywords: attrition, crosslinguistic influence, word order, processing, verb movement
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1The syntax of V2
    • 2.2V2 variation
    • 2.3The development of V2
    • 2.4V2 in heritage languages
  • 3.Our study
  • 4.Research questions and predictions
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Overview of participants and dataset
    • 5.2Proportion of non-subject-initial declaratives and V2 violations
    • 5.3Comparing subject- and non-subject-initial declaratives
    • 5.4Syntactic and information structure factors
      • 5.4.1The effect of type of subject and verb
      • 5.4.2The effect of form, function and length of the initial element
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20076.wes
References (72)
References
Anderssen, M. (2006). The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Anderssen, M., & Bentzen, K. (2018). Different outcomes in the acquisition of residual V2 and do-Support in three Norwegian-English bilinguals: Cross-linguistic influence, dominance and structural ambiguity. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, 2130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnbjörnsdóttir, B., Thráinsson, H., & Nowenstein, I. (2018). V2 and V3 Orders in North-American Icelandic. Journal of Language Contact, 11(3), 379–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lm4. Journal of Statistical Software, 6(1), 1–48.Google Scholar
Bech, K. (2001). Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Bentzen, K. (2014). Verb placement in clauses with initial adverbial maybe . Nordic Atlas of Linguistic Structures (NALS) 11, 225–239.Google Scholar
Blom, E. (2003). From root infinitive to finite sentences: The acquisition of verbal inflections and auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, U., & Rosén, C. (2008). The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives: Transfer of information structure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 511–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brautaset, A. (1996). Inversjon i norsk mellomspråk: En undersøkelse av inversjon i stiler skrevet av innlærere med norsk som andrespråk. Novus.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1990). Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition in stages in German child language. Language Acquisition, 11, 361–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craenenbroeck, J. van, & Haegeman, L. (2007). The derivation of subject-initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry, 381, 167–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A. (2009). Bilingual First Language Acquisition. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Besten, H. (1983). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abraham, W. (Ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania (pp. 47–131). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döpke, S. (1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German–English children. Journal of Child Language, 251, 555–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, K. M. (2011). Norwegian (Non-V2) declaratives, resumptive elements, and the Wackernagel position. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 341, 179–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, K. M., & Hjelde, A. (2015). Verb Second and Finiteness Morphology in Norwegian heritage language of the American Midwest. In B. R. Page & M. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic Heritage Languages in North America (pp. 64–101). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. (2010). The effect of age on language attrition: Evidences from bilingual returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(4), 533–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G. (1995). Syntax and morphology in language attrition: A study of five bilingual expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 51, 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, E. (2002). Inflectional morphology and the loss of verb-second in English. In D. Lightfoot (Ed.), Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change (pp. 88–106). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1996). Verb second, the split CP and initial null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. Geneva Generative Papers, 41, 133–175.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L., & Greco, C. (2018). West Flemish V3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 211, 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15(6), 409–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Platzack, C. (1995). The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopp, H., & Putnam, M. (2015). Syntactic restructuring in heritage grammars: Word order variation in Moundridge Schweitzer German. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 51, 180–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C., McDermott, L., & Schmid, M. S. (2011). Changing syntactic preferences in L1 attriters of German. International Symposium on Bilingualism, 81, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. (2015). The Corpus of American Norwegian Speech (CANS). In B. Megyesi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics 231.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B., & Salmons, J. (To appear). Germanic Languages in America. In S. Montrul & M. Polinsky (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Kemenade, A. van, & Los, B. (2006). Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (Eds.), Handbook of the History of English (pp. 224–248). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, A. van, & Westergaard, M. (2012). Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In A. M. Solin, M. J. López-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English (pp. 87–118). Oxford University Presse. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kühl, K., & Petersen, J. H. (2018). The position of subject and finite verb in American Danish sentences with a fronted element. Journal of Language Contact, 11(3), 413–440.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2016). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 564–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1999). The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Larsson, I., & Johannessen, J. B. (2015). Incomplete acquisition and verb placement in Heritage Scandinavian. In R. S. Page & M. Putnam (Eds.), Moribound Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings (pp. 153–189). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, Russell V.. (2021). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.5.5–1. [URL]
Lohndal, T., Westergaard, M., & Vangsnes, Ø. A. (2020). Verb Second in Norwegian: Variation and acquisition. In Woods, R., & Wolfe, S. (Eds.), Rethinking V2. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lundquist, B., Anderssen, M., Lohndal, T., & Westergaard, M. (2020). Variation across individuals and domains in Norwegian heritage language. Oslo Studies in Language 11(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. D., Dering, B., Thomas, E. M., & Thierry, G. (2009). Brain potentials reveal semantic priming in both the ‘active’ and the ‘non-attended’ language of early bilinguals. NeuroImage, 47(1), 326–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, L. (2015). VP anaphora and verb-second order in Danish. Journal of Linguistics, 511, 595–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating positions. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. (1998). A visibility condition for the C-domain. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 611, 53–99.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2018). Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. T., & Sánchez, L. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. T., Carlson, M., & Reitter, D. (2018). Integrated, not isolated: Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 2212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Speculations on verb second. In J. Mascaró & M. Nespor (Eds.), Grammar in progress (pp. 375–386). Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Vikner, S. (1996). The verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. In A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and functional heads (pp. 11–62). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Köpke, B. (2017). The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(6), 637–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speyer, A. (2008). Topicalization and Clash Avoidance: On the interaction of prosody and syntax in the history of English with a few glances at German. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. T. (1986). On verb second and the functional content of syntactic categories. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn (Eds.), Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages (pp. 7–25). Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(1991). Parameters of phrase structure and verb-second phenomena. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 339–364). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Ø. A. (2005). Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars. Linguistic variation yearbook, 5(1), 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, S. (1995). Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldmann, C. (2012). Moving in small steps towards verb second: A case study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 341, 331–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, G. (2017). Language contact and V3 in Germanic varieties new and old. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 201, 49–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weerman, F. (1989). The V2 Conspiracy. A Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009a). Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 12(1), 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Linguistic variation and micro-cues in first language acquisition. Linguistic Variation, 14(1), 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Gradience and gradualness vs. abruptness. In A. Ledgeway & I. Roberts (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax (pp. 446–466). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019a). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). Attrition via acquisition: The importance of development in small steps. Second Language Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., & Lohndal, T. (2019). Verb second word order in Norwegian heritage language: Syntax and pragmatics. In D. Lightfoot & J. Havenhill (Eds.), Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition (pp. 91–102). Georgetown University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Lohndal, T., & Alexiadou, A. (2019). The asymmetric nature of V2: Evidence from learner languages. In K. R. Christensen, H. Jørgensen & J. L. Wood (Eds.), The sign of the V: Papers in honour of Sten Vikner (pp. 709–733). School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Vangsnes, Ø., & Lohndal, T. (2017). Variation and change in Norwegian wh-questions: The role of the complementizer som . Linguistic Variation, 17(1), 8–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, S. (2018). Verb second in Medieval Romance. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2001). Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change, 12 (3), 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, J.-W. (1993). Dutch syntax: a minimalist approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Zwart, J-W. (1997). The morphosyntax of verb movement: A minimalist approach to Dutch syntax. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Jensberg, Helene R., Merete B. Anderssen, Terje Lohndal, Björn Lundquist & Marit Westergaard
2024. Verb placement in embedded clauses in heritage Norwegian. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur, Iris Edda Nowenstein & Höskuldur Thráinsson
2023. V2 violations in different variants of Icelandic: A common denominator?. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Busterud, Guro, Anne Dahl, Dave Kush & Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
2023. Verb placement in L3 French and L3 German. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:5 ► pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
Kinn, Kari & George Walkden
2023. Exploring Norn: A Historical Heritage Language of the British Isles. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Ida & Kari Kinn
2022. Stability and Change in the C-Domain in American Swedish. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.