Cover not available
Squib published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 13:3 (2023) ► pp.299–314
Squib

The LexTALE as a measure of L2 global proficiency

A cautionary tale based on a partial replication of Lemhöfer and Broersma (2012)

ORCID logo | King’s College London
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
| Universidad de Granada
The role of proficiency is widely discussed in multilingual language acquisition research, and yet, there is little consensus as to how one should operationalize it in our empirical investigations. The present study assesses the validity of the LexTALE (Lemhöfer & Broersma, 2012) as a ‘quick and valid’ measure of global proficiency. We first provide an overview review of how the LexTALE has been used since its publication, showing that although the test has gained popularity in the last few years, its reliability has not been thoroughly examined. Thus, herein we present results of a partial replication of Lemhöfer and Broersma (2012), where we empirically assess the validity of the LexTALE as a measure of L2 global proficiency in two groups of learners of English with various degrees of proficiency (L1 Spanish, n = 288; L1 Chinese, n = 266). Results indicate that if we are to use LexTALE in our investigations, we should do so with caution as the analyses show that irrespective of the L1 and level of proficiency of the targeted participants, its reliability as a measure of global proficiency is under question evidenced by the low and moderate correlations found with a standardised measure of global proficiency.
Keywords: LexTALE, L2 global proficiency, vocabulary size, conceptual replication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The LexTALE: What is it?
  • 3.The LexTALE: How has it been used?
  • 4.A partial replication of Lemhöfer and Broersma (2012)
  • 5.Methods
    • 5.1General procedure and instruments
    • 5.2Participants
  • 6.Results and discussion
  • 7.A concerning state of affairs and implications for future research
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 January 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22048.pui
References (20)
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2). University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language Proficiency in Native and Nonnative Speakers: An Agenda for Research and Suggestions for Second-Language Assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8 (3), 229–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15 (2), 422–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44 (2), 325–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McManus, K. (2022). Are replication studies infrequent because of negative attitudes?: Insights from a survey of attitudes and practices in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(5), 1410–1423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malovth, P., & Benati, A. (2018). The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.)). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field. Language Learning, 68 (2), 321–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (1996). English Vocabulary Tests: 10 k. Unpublished manuscript. Center for Applied Language Studies.Google Scholar
Nakata, T., Tamura, Y., & Aubrey, S. (2020). Examining the Validity of the LexTALE Test for Japanese College Students. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17 (2), 335–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and Measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 716–761). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Assessing learner knowledge. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 573–589). Routledge.Google Scholar
Park, H. I., Solon, M., Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M., & Ghanbar, H. (2022). Proficiency Reporting Practices in Research on Second Language Acquisition: Have We Made any Progress? Language Learning, 72 (1), 198–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porte, G., & McManus, K. (2019). Doing Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition Research. Language Learning, 44 (2), 307–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 279–298). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 441, 423–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency Assessment Standards in Second Language Acquisition Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33 (3), 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Brown, Rachel M. & Tanja C. Roembke
2024. Production benefits on encoding are modulated by language experience: Less experience may help. Memory & Cognition 52:4 ► pp. 926 ff. DOI logo
Cal, Zuzanna & Magdalena Wrembel
2024. Developmental acquisition of stops by multilingual speakers. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Po-Heng, Rachael C. Hulme, Lena M. Blott & Jennifer M. Rodd
2024. The Web-based Open-access Reliable Decision on Synonyms (WORDS) English Vocabulary Test. Journal of Cognition 7:1 DOI logo
Dewaele, Jean‐Marc, Irini Mavrou, Andreas Kyriakou & Pernelle Lorette
2024. The role of language and emotional intelligence in judgments of real‐life social and moral transgressions among Greek, Hungarian, and British users of English. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 37:1 DOI logo
Lijewska, Agnieszka & Robertus de Louw
2024. Facilitation for non-identical cognates in L3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Liu, Hong & Adel Chaouch-Orozco
2024. Evaluation of the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) as a quick and practical proxy for language proficiency. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:5 ► pp. 759 ff. DOI logo
Alzahrani, Alaa
2023. LexArabic: A receptive vocabulary size test to estimate Arabic proficiency. Behavior Research Methods 56:6 ► pp. 5529 ff. DOI logo
Raedts, Mariet & Irene Roozen
2023. Subtitles in English-only TV commercials. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 DOI logo
Turner, James
2023. The role of L2 input in developing a novel L2 contrast phonetically and phonologically: Production evidence from a residence abroad context. Second Language Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.