Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism: Online-First Articles

Intonation of polar questions in German-dominant heritage speakers of Italian

ORCID logo | University of Konstanz,
ORCID logo | University of Konstanz,
In heritage language (HL) research, prosodic aspects of heritage speakers (HSs) speech have only recently started to receive attention and the results have been mixed. While some studies report cross-linguistic influence (CLI) for HL intonation, others consider it robust. The present study contributes to this debate and examines the intonational patterns of polar questions (PolQs) in the two languages of 30 HSs of Italian with German as majority language. This language combination displays overlapping and distinct intonational patterns in PolQs, making intonation potentially subject to CLI in bilingual language acquisition. The results of an elicited production task indicate that HSs maintain a systemic difference between their two languages. In German, HSs produce PolQs in a monolingual like manner. In Italian of HSs, both monolingual-like performance and CLI from German has been observed. Early Italian use is beneficial for monolingual-like outcomes in the HL.
Keywords: heritage speakers, question intonation, Italian-German bilinguals, cross-linguistic influence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Polar questions in Italian and German
      • Italian
      • German
    • 2.2Intonation in heritage speakers
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
      • Proficiency
      • Early Italian use
    • 3.2Materials and procedure
    • 3.3Data treatment and statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Language comparison of HSs
      • Nuclear pitch accents
      • Boundary tones
      • Nuclear contour
    • 4.2Group comparison in German and Italian
      • Nuclear pitch accents
      • Boundary tones
      • Nuclear contours
    • 4.3Effects of proficiency and Italian use during early childhood
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Intonational patterns in the early acquired languages
    • 5.2HSs’ intonational patterns in comparison to monolinguals
    • 5.3Effects of proficiency and early language use
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Competing interests
  • Data availability
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 16 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23031.kri
References (67)
References
Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. Continuum.Google Scholar
Andreeva, B., Dimitrova, S., Gabriel, C., & Grünke, J. (2021). Intonational convergence in Bulgarian Judeo-Spanish spontaneous speech. In A. Teixeira Kalkhoff, M. Selig & C. Mooshammer. (Eds.), Prosody and conceptional variation (pp. 93–107). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Arona, S., & Kupisch, T. (2022). Italienisch als Herkunftssprache im Fremdsprachenunterricht: Die Rolle der Dialektkompetenz. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 27 (2), 17–49.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D. R., & Mennen, I. (2006). Tonal association and tonal alignment: evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Language and Speech, 49 (4), 421–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avesani, C. (1995). ToBIt: un sistema di trascrizione per l’intonazione italiana. In G. Lazzari. (Ed.) Atti delle V Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale (A.I.A.) (pp. 85–98). Servizio Editoria ITC.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walkers, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). The ToBI annotation conventions. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (2018). 18. The languages and dialects of Italy. In W. Ayres-Bennett & J. Carruthers. (Eds.), Manual of Romance sociolinguistics (pp. 494–525). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 6.1.05).Google Scholar
Bolinger, D., & Bolinger, D. L. M. (1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, B., Dehé, N., Neitsch, J., Wochner, D., & Zahner, K. (2019). The prosody of rhetorical and information-seeking questions in German. Language and Speech, 62 (4), 779–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullock, B. E. (2009). Prosody in contact in French: A case study from a heritage variety in the USA. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13 (2), 165–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canepari, L. (1980). Italiano standard e pronunce regionali. Padova: Cleup.Google Scholar
Carter, P. M., López Valdez, L., & Sims, N. (2020). New dialect formation through language contact: vocalic and prosodic developments in Miami English. American Speech, 95 (2), 119–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, P. M., & Wolford, T. (2016). Cross-generational prosodic convergence in South Texas Spanish. Spanish in Context, 13 (1), 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cataldo, V. (2023). The intonation of closely related varieties. The case of Campania Italian. Ghent University.Google Scholar
Cerruti, M. (2011). Regional varieties of Italian in the linguistic repertoire. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 210 1, 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2021). Phonetics and phonology of heritage languages. In S. Montrul & M. Polinsky. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics (pp. 581–612). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20 1, 37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J. (2004). Convergence and intonation: historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7 (2), 107–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crocco, C. (2006). Prosodic and informational aspects of polar questions in Neapolitan Italian. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006 1 (pp. 807–810). Dresden, Germany. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1981). Falls and rises: meanings and universals. Journal of Linguistics, 17 (1), 77–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, N. (2018). The intonation of polar questions in North American (“heritage”) Icelandic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30 (3), 213–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamer, M., Lemon, J., Fellows, I., & Singh, P. (2019). irr: various coefficients of interrator reliability and agreement. R package version 0.48.1.Google Scholar
Geiss, M., Gumbsheimer, S., Lloyd-Smith, A., Schmid, S., & Kupisch, T. (2022). Voice onset time in multilingual speakers: Italian heritage speakers in Germany with L3 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44 (2), 435–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gili Fivela, B., Avesani, C., Barone, M., Bocci, G., Crocco, C., D’Imperio, M., Giordano, R., Marotta, G., Savino, M., & Sorianello, P. (2015). Intonational phonology of the regional varieties of Italian. In S. Frota & P. Prieto. (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp. 140–197). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, M. (2006). Intonation. In K. Brown. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd Edition, Vol. 5 1 (pp. 778–788). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, M., & Baumann, S. (2002). Deutsche Intonation und GToBl. Linguistische Berichte, 267–298.Google Scholar
Grünke, J. C. (2021). Intonation in Language Contact: the Case of Spanish in Catalonia. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Nelson, D. G. K., Jusczyk, P. W., Cassidy, K. W., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26 (3), 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoot, B., & Leal, T. (2023). Resilience and vulnerability of discourse-conditioned word order in heritage Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. (1994). The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics, 30 (2), 411–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kan, R. T., & Schmid, M. S. (2019). Development of tonal discrimination in young heritage speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics, 73 1, 40–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. -Y. (2019). Heritage speakers’ use of prosodic strategies in focus marking in Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23 (5), 986–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Discrepancy between heritage speakers’ use of suprasegmental cues in the perception and production of Spanish lexical stress. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (2), 233–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2020). Towards modelling heritage speakers’ sound systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 1, 29–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., Klaschik, E., Stangen, I., Lein, T., & van de Weijer, J. (2014). Foreign accent in adult simultaneous bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal, 11 (2), 123–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., Lloyd-Smith, A., & Stangen, I. (2020). Perceived global accent in Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. In F. Bayram. (Ed.), Studies in Turkish as a Heritage Language (pp. 207–228). SiBil Series, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 1, 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lein, T., Kupisch, T., & van de Weijer, J. (2016). Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German–French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20 (6), 732–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiner, D. J. (2019). SoSci Survey (Version 3.2.32).Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, A., Einfeldt, M., & Kupisch, T. (2020). Italian-German bilinguals: The effects of heritage language use on accent in early-acquired languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24 (2), 289–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marotta, G., & Sorianello, P. (1999). Question intonation in Sienese Italian. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 14) (pp. 1161–1164). San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32 (4), 543–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations. 171–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016). The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pešková, A. (2022): Intonation Patterns Used in Non-Neutral Statements by Czech Learners of Italian and Spanish: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Languages, 7 (4), 282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). L2 Spanish and Italian intonation: Accounting for the different patterns displayed by L1 Czech And German learners. ( Open Romance Linguistics 5 ). Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, J. (2006). Intonation deutscher Regionalsprachen. De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piccinini, P. & Arvaniti, A. (2019). Dominance, mode, and individual variation in bilingual speech production and perception. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9 (4–5), 628–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT libraries. [URL]
Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G. (2019). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (1), 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Queen, R. M. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish-German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30 1, 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, R. (2016). On the nuclear intonational phonology of heritage speakers of Spanish. In D. Pascual y Cabo. (Ed.) Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language (pp. 51–80). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, L. (2017). The dynamic nature of bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7 (6), 754–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savino, M. (2012). The intonation of polar questions in Italian: Where is the rise? Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42 (1), 23–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharff-Rethfeldt, W., Miller, N., & Mennen, I. (2008). Unterschiede in der mittleren Sprechtonhöhe bei Deutsch/Englisch bilingualen Sprechern. Sprache Stimme·Gehör, 32 (03), 123–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, S., & Dellwo, V. (2013). Sprachrhythmus bei bilingualen Sprechern. TRANEL-Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 59 1, 109–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Souganidis, C., Molinaro, N., & Stoehr, A. (2022). Bilinguals produce language-specific voice onset time in two true-voicing languages: The case of Basque-Spanish early bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. (2019). Dominance, proficiency, and Spanish heritage speakers’ production of English and Spanish vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41 (1), 123–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosi, A. (2001). Language and society in a changing Italy. Multilingualism Matters.Google Scholar
Weber, T., Schönhuber, M., & Grijzenhout, J. (2018). The prosody of yes/no-questions in German first language acquisition. Proceedings of Phonetics & Phonology in German-speaking countries (pp. 197–200). Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Zuban, Y., Rathcke, T., & Zerbian, S. (2020). Intonation of yes-no questions by heritage speakers of Russian. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2020. 96–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, focus, and word order. The MIT Press.Google Scholar