Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism: Online-First Articles

Are non-native speakers sensitive to microvariation in anaphora resolution?

The case of Italian and Spanish learners of L2 European Portuguese

ORCID logo | NOVA University Lisbon, CLUNL – Linguistics Research Centre of NOVA University Lisbon
ORCID logo | NOVA University Lisbon, CLUNL – Linguistics Research Centre of NOVA University Lisbon
ORCID logo | NOVA University Lisbon, CLUNL – Linguistics Research Centre of NOVA University Lisbon
This study investigates anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese by Italian and Spanish native speakers to examine whether learners are sensitive to microvariation among these null subject Romance languages. Participants were 25 adult L1 EP speakers, 69 L1 Italian, and 42 L1 Spanish adult learners of EP at three levels: upper–intermediate, advanced, and near-native. They completed an untimed and a speeded multiple-choice task crossing the variables animacy of the matrix object and type of embedded subject. Results indicate that sensitivity to microvariation develops as L2 proficiency increases. However, learners’ performance remains permanently unstable in the areas where the L1 and the L2 differ, which is only visible in the speeded task. Our findings challenge the idea that the L1 plays a minor role in anaphora resolution and have implications for the Interface Hypothesis.
Keywords: L2 anaphora resolution, microvariation, L1 influence, interfaces, European Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Microvariation in anaphora resolution in Romance
  • 3.The L2 acquisition of anaphora resolution in Romance
  • 4.Research questions and predictions
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Experimental design
    • 5.3Data analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1The untimed task
    • 6.2The speeded task
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Data availability statement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23041.tei
References (42)
References
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic–focus articulation in Spanish. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 14 (2), 151–170.Google Scholar
Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics, 46 (2), 273–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25 (4), 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bini, M. (1993). La adquisicíon del italiano: Mas allá de las propiedades sintácticas del parámetro pro-drop. In J. Liceras (Ed.), La linguistica y el analisis de los sistemas no nativos (pp. 126–139). Doverhouse.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33 (1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (2004). Toward a cartography of subject positions. L. Rizzi (Ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 21 (pp. 115–165). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Chamorro, G. (2018). Offline interpretation of subject pronouns by native speakers of Spanish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3 (1), 27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, M., & Domínguez, L. (2016). Reexamining the acquisition of null subject pronouns in a second language: Focus on referential and pragmatic constraints. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7 (1), 33–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contemori, C., & Di Domenico, E. (2021). Microvariation in the division of labor between null- and overt-subject pronouns: the case of Italian and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42 1, 997–1028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiéis, A., Madeira, A., & Teixeira, J. (2022a). Microvariation in the resolution of pronominal subjects in Romance: European Portuguese vs. Italian. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 8 (5), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022b). A Estratégia da Posição do Antecedente em línguas românicas de sujeito nulo. Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 9 1, 109–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filiaci, F. (2010). Null and overt subject biases in Spanish and Italian: A cross-linguistic comparison. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 171–182). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Filiaci, F., Sorace, A., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: a cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (7), 825–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukumura, K., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (10), 1472–1504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakou, A. (2023). Anaphora resolution and age effects in Greek-Spanish bilingualism: Evidence from first-generation immigrants, heritage speakers, and L2 speakers. Lingua, 29 1, 103573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakou, A., & Sitaridou, I. (2020). Microparametric variation in the syntax of Spanish and Greek pronominal subjects. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5 (1), 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36 1, 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2007). Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.
Lee, E., & Phillips, C. (2023). Why non-native speakers sometimes outperform native speakers in agreement processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26 1, 152–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J., & Alba de la Fuente, A. (2015). Typological proximity in L2 acquisition. The Spanish non-native grammar of French speakers. In T. Judy, & S. Perpiñán (Eds.), The Acquisition of Spanish in Understudied Language Pairings (pp. 329–358). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobo, M., Madeira, A., & Silva, C. (2017). Interpretação de pronomes sujeito anafóricos e catafóricos por falantes de português L2: efeitos da língua materna. Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 3 1, 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C. (2003). Universal Grammar and focus constraints: The acquisition of pronouns and word order in non-native Spanish. PhD thesis, University of Essex.
(2008). ¿Déficits de representación o de procesamiento en una segunda lengua? Evidencia de un estudio de resolución de anáfora con griegos adultos aprendices de español. In R. Monroy, & A. Sánchez (Eds.), 25 años de Lingüística Aplicada en España: Hitos y retos (pp. 855–866). Editum.Google Scholar
Margaza, P., & Bel, A. (2006). Null subjects at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Evidence from Spanish interlanguage of Greek speakers. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of GASLA 2006 (pp. 88–97). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, M. K., & Juffs, A. (2022). The effect of animacy on object pronoun distinctions in L2 Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 12 (2), 220–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. (2019). Two minds are not always better than one: Modeling evidence for a single sentence analyzer. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4 (1), 64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2018). Subjects, topics and the interpretation of pro. In R. Petrosino, P. Cerrone, & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), From Sounds to Structures: Beyond the Veil of Maya (pp. 510–529). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocafiguera, N., & Bel, A. (2022). On the Impact of Clause Order on Pronoun Resolution: Evidence from Spanish. Folia Linguistica, 56 (1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (5), 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12 1, 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Ivanov, I. (2011). A more careful look at the syntax–discourse interface. Lingua, 121 (4), 637–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 1, 133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism: a reply to peer commentaries. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2 1, 209–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (5), 669–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22 (3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13 (2), 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torregrossa, J., Andreou, M., & Bongartz, C. M. (2020). Variation in the use and interpretation of null subjects: A view from Greek and Italian. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5 (1), 95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L., Goad, H., Garcia, G., Guzzo, N. B., Smeets, L., & Su, J. (2024). Pronoun interpretation in Italian: Exploring the effects of prosody. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar