Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 14:5 (2024) ► pp.759–773

Evaluation of the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) as a quick and practical proxy for language proficiency

ORCID logo | Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
ORCID logo | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
The present study compares the performance of two quick lexical tests, the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and the Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English (LexTALE), to evaluate their suitability to serve as proxies for English proficiency in second language learners. Specifically, it investigates how well these tests’ results align with those of the Quick Placement Test (QPT), an objective placement test employed in previous validations of the LexTALE. Considering recent findings by Puig-Mayenco et al. (2023) suggesting the LexTALE is apt for measuring advanced proficiencies but is less reliable with lower ones, our study aims to test the performance of both the LexTALE and MINT across different proficiencies. Two hundred nineteen Chinese learners of English, spanning both higher and lower proficiency levels, participated in the study. The results showed that the relationship between the MINT and QPT was similar to that between the LexTALE and QPT. However, the MINT demonstrated better performance than the LexTALE in assessing lower proficiency levels. These results underscore the MINT’s potential to serve as a quick and valid proxy for proficiency across all levels, particularly in research contexts where the use of longer and more comprehensive assessment tools is not possible.
Keywords: language proficiency, proficiency test, L2 proficiency, MINT, LexTALE
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Ways of measuring proficiency
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2General procedure
      • 2.2.1MINT
      • 2.2.2LexTALE
      • 2.2.3Quick Placement Test (QPT)
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Declaration of conflicting interests
  • Data availability statement
  • References
Published online: 29 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23066.liu
References (43)
References
Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52 1, 388–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (2022). How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29 1, 1246–1269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2013). LEXTALE_FR: A fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, 53 (1), 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabria, M., Costa, A., Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2018). Neural basis of bilingual language control. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1426 (1), 221–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (5), 1057–1074.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Çakmak, F., Namaziandost, E., & Kumar, T. (2021). CALL-enhanced L2 vocabulary learning: using spaced exposure through CALL to enhance L2 vocabulary retention. Education Research International, 2021, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bruin, A., Carreiras, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2017). The BEST dataset of language proficiency. Frontier in Psychology, 8 1, 522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bruin, A. (2019). Not all bilinguals are the same: A call for more detailed assessments and descriptions of bilingual experiences. Behavioral Sciences, 9 (3), 33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, V., Rothman, J., Bialystok, E., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (15), 7565–7574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, D. L., & Gollan, T. H. (2022). The MINT Sprint: Exploring a fast administration procedure with an expanded multilingual naming test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 28 (8), 845–861. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English Quick Placement Test. Research Notes, 12 (3), 8–10.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G. H., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multi-Lingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism (Cambridge, England), 15 1, 594–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Starr, J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2015). More than use it or lose it: The number-of-speakers effect on heritage language proficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22 (1), 147–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, B. (2024). The role of the lexicon. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14 (1), 58–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competency. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–285). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2018). The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, 17 1, 5–17.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I., Salmon, D. P., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). The multilingual naming test in alzheimer’s disease: Clues to the origin of naming impairments. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19 1, 272–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izura, C., Cuetos, F., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Lextale-Esp: A test to rapidly and efficiently assess the Spanish vocabulary size. Psicologica, 35 1, 49–66.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2022). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: An updated meta-analysis. In: E. H. Jeon EH & Y. In’nami (Eds.), Understanding L2 proficiency: Theoretical and meta-analytic investigations (pp. 29–86). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44 (2), 325–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X. (2020). Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (5). 938–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., & Chaouch-Orozco, A. (2023). Is the digit effect a cognate effect? Digits (still) differ from pictures in non-phonologically mediated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26 1, 469–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T., Tamura, Y., & Aubrey, S. (2020). Examining the validity of the LexTALE test for Japanese college students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17 (2), 335–348.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., & Montanari, S. (2016). Bilingualism across the lifespan: Factors moderating language proficiency. American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and Measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 716–761). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50 1, 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Hayakawa, S. (2021). Measuring bilingualism: The quest for a “bilingualism quotient”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42 (2), 527–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLean, Stewart J., & & Batty, A. O. (2020). Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach. Language Testing, 37 (3), 389–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otero, J. C. L. (2023). Imperatives in heritage Spanish: Lexical access and lexical frequency effects. Languages, 8 (3), 218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otero, J. C. L., & Jimenez, A. (2022). Productive vocabulary knowledge predicts acquisition of Spanish DOM in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking learners. Languages, 7 (4), 273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, H. I., Solon, M., Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M., & Ghanbar, H. (2022). Proficiency reporting practices in research on second language acquisition: Have we made any progress? Language Learning, 72 (1), 198–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pliatsikas, C., Moschopoulou, E., & Saddy, J. D. (2015). The effects of bilingualism on the white matter structure of the brain. PNAS, 112 (5), 1334–1337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., Chaouch-Orozco, A., Liu, H., & Martín-Villena, F. (2023). A word of caution for the use of the LexTALE as a measure of global L2 proficiency: A partial replication of Lemhöfer and Broersma (2012). Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13 (3), 299–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheng, L., Lu, Y., & Gollan, T. H. (2014). Assessing language dominance in Mandarin-English bilinguals: Convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures. Bilingualism (Cambridge, England), 17 1, 364–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegelman, N., Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Agrawal, N. et al. (2024). Rethinking first language–second language similarities and differences in English proficiency: Insights from the ENglish Reading Online (ENRO) project. Language Learning, 74 (1), 249–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 279–298). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomoschuk, B., Ferreira, V. S., & Gollan, T. H. (2019). When a seven is not a seven: Self-ratings of bilingual language proficiency differ between and within language populations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22 1, 516–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33 (3), 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, Y., Qiu, Y., Leong, C. X. R., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2023). LexCHI: A quick lexical test for estimating language proficiency in Chinese. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Windsor, J., Kohnert, K., Loxtercamp, A. L., & Kan, P. F. (2008). Performance on nonlinguistic visual tasks by children with language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29 (2), 237–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Shiotsu, T. (2017). Comprehension and knowledge components that predict L2 reading: A latent-trait approach. Applied Linguistics, 38 (1), 43–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar