Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 289–295
Commentary

Grammar in parsing and acquisition

| Bangor University
Article outline
  • A processor without grammar?
  • Acquisition and processing of scope
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 16 September 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.3.03cho
References
Anderson, C
(2004) The structure and real-time comprehension of quantifier scope ambiguity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Anderson, J
(1971) The grammar of case: Towards a localistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1993) A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale, & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 201 (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conroy, A
(2008) The role of verification strategies in semantic ambiguity resolution in children and adults. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L
(1994) Learning, parsing, and modularity. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 443–467). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fox, D
(2000) Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K
(1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 141, 178–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E.A., & Pearlmutter, N.J
(Eds.) (2011) The processing and acquisition of reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goro, T., & Akiba, S
(2004) Japanese disjunction and the acquisition of positive polarity. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 137–162). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lieberman, M., & Gualmini, A
(2010) Acquiring the scope of disjunction and negation in L2: A bidirectional study of learners of Japanese and English. Language Acquisition, 171, 127–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gualmini, A., & Crain, S
(2005) The structure of children’s linguistic knowledge. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 463–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.A
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R
(1984) Word grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R
(2007) Language, consciousness, culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S.M
(1966) Outline of stratificational grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, M., Kwak, H., Lee, S., & O’Grady, W
(2011) Processing, pragmatics, and scope in Korean and English. In H. Sohn, H. Cook, W. O’Grady, L. Serafim, & S. Cheon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Japanese-Korean linguistics conference (pp. 297–311). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Lidz, J., & Musolino, J
(2002) Children’s command of quantification. Cognition, 841, 113–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T
(2010) Using on-line processing methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom, & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 139–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolino, J., & Gualmini, A
(2011) Parsing, grammar and the raising of children at LF. In E.A. Gibson, & N.J. Pearlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 109–132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolino, J., & Lidz, J
(2003) The scope of isomorphisim: Turning adults into children. Language Acquisition, 111, 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C
(1996) Order and structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pinker, S
(1999) Words and rules. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T
(2006) Scope shift with numeral indefinites — syntax or processing? In S. Vogeleer, & L. Tasmowski (Eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality (pp. 291–311). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R
(1994) Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra, & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sekerina, I.A., Fernández, E.M., & Clahsen, H
(2008) Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, J
(2009) Children’s sentence processing. In E. Bavin (Ed.), The handbook of child language (pp. 331–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A
(2002) Hungarian disjunction and positive polarity. In I. Kenesei, & P. Siptár (Eds.), Approaches to hungarian (pp. 217–241). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J.C., Sekerina, I.A., Hill, N., & Logrip, M
(1999) The kindergarten path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 731, 89–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Gualmini, A., & Helder, C
(2008) Children’s interpretation of indefinites in sentences containing negation: A re-assessment of the cross-linguistic picture. Language Acquisition, 151, 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar