Introduction published in:
Parsing to Learn
Edited by Laurent Dekydtspotter and Claire Renaud
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:2] 2014
► pp. 167–191

[ p. 167 ]Accessing and maintaining referents in L2 processing of wh-dependencies

| Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
This study considers the role of lexical access in the activation and maintenance of referents interacting with syntactic computations during the online processing of wh-dependencies in second-language French by beginning (N = 39), low intermediate (N = 40), and high intermediate (N = 35) learners. Two computer-paced reading tasks involving concurrent picture classification were designed to investigate trace reactivation during sentence processing: The first task targeted sentences that contained indirect object relative clauses, whereas the second task involved indirect object cleft sentences. Response time profiles for sentences containing English-French cognates as antecedents were compared with those for sentences with noncognate vocabulary. All learner participants produced differing response patterns for cognate and noncognate items. Intermediate learners’ response patterns were consistent with trace reactivation for cognate items only; noncognate items induced inhibitions or erratic response patterns. Additionally, a (French-English bilingual) native speaker control group (N = 35) showed the predicted response pattern with the noncognate items only. These findings indicate that the role of lexical access in sentence processing merits further consideration.
Keywords: sentence processing, L2 French, filler-gap dependencies, lexical access
Published online: 27 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.2.02mil
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Castro, Tammer, Jason Rothman & Marit Westergaard
2017. On the Directionality of Cross-Linguistic Effects in Bidialectal Bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
CUNNINGS, IAN
2017. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 659 ff. Crossref logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent & Hyun-Kyoung Seo
2017. TRANSITIVITY IN THE PROCESSING OF INTRANSITIVE CLAUSES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3 ► pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo
HOPP, HOLGER
2016. The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 37:5 ► pp. 1253 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2017. Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic co-activation in L2 sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:1 ► pp. 96 ff. Crossref logo
HOPP, HOLGER
2017. Individual differences in L2 parsing and lexical representations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 689 ff. Crossref logo
JUFFS, ALAN
2017. Construct operationalization, L1 effects, and context in second language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 694 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo
2018. Second Language Processing of Korean Floating Numeral Quantifiers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:5 ► pp. 1101 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Angwin, A. J., Chenery, H. J., Copland, D. A., Cardell, E. A., Murdoch, B. E., & Ingram, J. C. L.
(2006) Searching for the trace: The influence of age, lexical activation and working memory on sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(1), 101–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus (version 3)
(2007) Available from http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/ Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., Sebastian-Galles, N.
(2000) The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283–1296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carr, T., & Dagenbach, D.
(1990) Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(2), 341–350.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006a) Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 107–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Grammatical processing in language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Barnhardt, T. M.
(1990) Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 328–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., & Nas, G. L.
(1991) Lexical representations of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 90–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L.
(2009) Second language epistemology: Take two. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 291–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Liljestrand-Fultz, A., & Petrush, R. A.
(2008) Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 453–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Miller, A. K., Schaefer, V., Chang, Y., & Kim, O.-K.
(2010) Clause-edge reactivations of fillers in processing English as a second language. In M. T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S.-K. Lee (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 108–122). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B.
(1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & Brinke, S. T.
(1998) Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J.
(2007) Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. S.
(1983) Automatic and controlled processes in the first and second language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 11(6), 565–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Roberts, L.
(2007) Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. D.
(1998) Parsing to learn. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(3), 339–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 116–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J.
(1997) Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(1), 119–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E., & Warren, T.
(2004) Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7(1), 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W.
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M.
(1992) L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 25–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2005) Alternative minimalist visions of language. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 41(2), 189–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M.
(1995) Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E.
(1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A.
(2009) Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Love, T.
(2007) The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long distance dependencies by pre-school children: A real-time investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(3), 191–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Love, T., Maas, E., & Swinney, D.
(2003) The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 204–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Love, T., & Swinney, D.
(1996) Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation in the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 5–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2005) Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 53–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Albritton, D., & Ratcliff, R.
(1996) Sentential context effects on lexical decisions with a cross-modal instead of an all-visual procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1494–1497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1994) Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1239–1243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R., & Ward, G.
(1994) Testing theories of language processing: An empirical investigation of the on-line lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1219–1228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., & Ferrand, L.
(2005) Lexique 3: Une nouvelle base de données lexicales [Lexique 3 : A new lexical database]. Available from http://​www​.lexique​.org CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. L., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D.
(1994) Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1229–1238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. L., & Swinney, D.
(1989) The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J., Swinney, D., Love, T., & Hald, L.
(2006) The on-line study of sentence comprehension: An examination of dual task paradigms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(3), 215–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B.
(2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M., & Barry, G.
(1991) Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(3), 229–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., Marinis, T., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2007) Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2), 175–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sag, I., & Fodor, J. D.
(1994) Extraction without traces. In R. Aranovich, W. Byren, S. Preuss, & M. Senturia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 365–384). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J. S., Price, J., & Sanford, A. J.
(2009) Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences. Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 880–888. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S., & Segalowitz, S. J.
(1993) Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(3), 369–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N., Möbius, P., & Kim, C.
(2001) Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 509–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar