Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Parsing to Learn
Edited by Laurent Dekydtspotter and Claire Renaud
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:2] 2014
► pp. 167–191
Introduction

Accessing and maintaining referents in L2 processing of wh-dependencies

| Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
This study considers the role of lexical access in the activation and maintenance of referents interacting with syntactic computations during the online processing of wh-dependencies in second-language French by beginning (N = 39), low intermediate (N = 40), and high intermediate (N = 35) learners. Two computer-paced reading tasks involving concurrent picture classification were designed to investigate trace reactivation during sentence processing: The first task targeted sentences that contained indirect object relative clauses, whereas the second task involved indirect object cleft sentences. Response time profiles for sentences containing English-French cognates as antecedents were compared with those for sentences with noncognate vocabulary. All learner participants produced differing response patterns for cognate and noncognate items. Intermediate learners’ response patterns were consistent with trace reactivation for cognate items only; noncognate items induced inhibitions or erratic response patterns. Additionally, a (French-English bilingual) native speaker control group (N = 35) showed the predicted response pattern with the noncognate items only. These findings indicate that the role of lexical access in sentence processing merits further consideration.
Keywords: sentence processing, L2 French, filler-gap dependencies, lexical access
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntactic processing in L1 and L2
  • 3.Lexical retrieval and sentence processing in L1 and L2
  • 4.The current study
    • 4.1Materials
    • 4.2Methodology
    • 4.3Participants and procedures
    • 4.4Analysis and predictions
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Relative clauses task
    • 5.2Clefts task
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Interpreting the response patterns
    • 6.2Implications
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.2.02mil
References (46)
References
Angwin, A. J., Chenery, H. J., Copland, D. A., Cardell, E. A., Murdoch, B. E., & Ingram, J. C. L. (2006). Searching for the trace: The influence of age, lexical activation and working memory on sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(1), 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus (version 3). (2007). Available from [URL] Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283–1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, T., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(2), 341–350.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006b). Grammatical processing in language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Barnhardt, T. M. (1990). Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 328–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., & Nas, G. L. (1991). Lexical representations of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 90–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. (2009). Second language epistemology: Take two. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 291–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Liljestrand-Fultz, A., & Petrush, R. A. (2008). Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 453–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Miller, A. K., Schaefer, V., Chang, Y., & Kim, O.-K. (2010). Clause-edge reactivations of fillers in processing English as a second language. In M. T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S.-K. Lee (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 108–122). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & Brinke, S. T. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N. S. (1983). Automatic and controlled processes in the first and second language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 11(6), 565–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Parsing to learn. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(3), 339–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(1), 119–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7(1), 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2005). Alternative minimalist visions of language. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 41(2), 189–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, T. (2007). The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long distance dependencies by pre-school children: A real-time investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(3), 191–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, T., Maas, E., & Swinney, D. (2003). The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 204–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation in the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 53–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Albritton, D., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Sentential context effects on lexical decisions with a cross-modal instead of an all-visual procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1494–1497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1239–1243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R., & Ward, G. (1994). Testing theories of language processing: An empirical investigation of the on-line lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1219–1228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., & Ferrand, L. (2005). Lexique 3: Une nouvelle base de données lexicales [Lexique 3 : A new lexical database]. Available from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. L., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1229–1238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. L., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J., Swinney, D., Love, T., & Hald, L. (2006). The on-line study of sentence comprehension: An examination of dual task paradigms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(3), 215–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 563–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(3), 229–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., Marinis, T., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2007). Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2), 175–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sag, I., & Fodor, J. D. (1994). Extraction without traces. In R. Aranovich, W. Byren, S. Preuss, & M. Senturia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 365–384). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J. S., Price, J., & Sanford, A. J. (2009). Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences. Memory and Cognition, 37(6), 880–888. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. S., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(3), 369–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N., Möbius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 509–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Kim, Boyoung & Grant Goodall
2024. The source of the that-trace effect: New evidence from L2 English. Second Language Research 40:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Sanahuja, Noèlia & Kepa Erdocia
2024. The impact of cognate vocabulary on explicit L2 rule learning. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Berghoff, Robyn
2023. Wh-Dependency Processing in a Naturalistic Exposure Context: Sensitivity to Abstract Syntactic Structure in High-Working-Memory L2 Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:2 ► pp. 586 ff. DOI logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, A. Kate Miller, Mike Iverson, Yanyu Xiong, Kyle Swanson, Charlène Gilbert & Julie Franck
2023. The timing versus resource problem in nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from a time-frequency analysis of anaphora resolution in successive wh-movement in native and nonnative speakers of French. PLOS ONE 18:1 ► pp. e0275305 ff. DOI logo
Fernández Cuenca, Sara & Jill Jegerski
2023. A role for verb regularity in the L2 processing of the Spanish subjunctive mood: Evidence from eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:2 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Shanshan, Ziyin Mai & Yang Zhao
2023. Positive cross-linguistic influence in the representation and processing of sentence-final particle le by L2 and heritage learners of Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Klassen, Rachel, Nadine Kolb, Holger Hopp & Marit Westergaard
2022. Interactions between lexical and syntactic L1-L2 overlap: Effects of gender congruency on L2 sentence processing in L1 Spanish-L2 German speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:6 ► pp. 1221 ff. DOI logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, A. Kate Miller, Mike Iverson, Yanyu Xiong, Kyle Swanson & Charlène Gilbert
2021. Minimal brain adaptation for representational prioritization in non-native parsing: Evidence from a time-frequency analysis of recursion in Wh-dependencies in French. Journal of Neurolinguistics 59 ► pp. 101002 ff. DOI logo
Foltz, Anouschka
2021. Adaptation in Predictive Prosodic Processing in Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Frimu, Rodica & Laurent Dekydtspotter
2021. On feature-based vocabulary selection mechanisms in late insertion: third person number agreement in the French future tense. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Frimu, Rodica & Laurent Dekydtspotter
2022. Inference-based form selection in native and non-native speakers: Evidence from subject-verb agreement error detection in French. Lingua 270 ► pp. 103216 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo
2018. Second Language Processing of Korean Floating Numeral Quantifiers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:5 ► pp. 1101 ff. DOI logo
Castro, Tammer, Jason Rothman & Marit Westergaard
2017. On the Directionality of Cross-Linguistic Effects in Bidialectal Bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
CUNNINGS, IAN
2017. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Cunnings, Ian
2022. Interference-based and capacity-based approaches to working memory in second language sentence processing. In Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 67], ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent & Hyun-Kyoung Seo
2017. TRANSITIVITY IN THE PROCESSING OF INTRANSITIVE CLAUSES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3 ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
JUFFS, ALAN
2017. Construct operationalization, L1 effects, and context in second language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 694 ff. DOI logo
HOPP, HOLGER
2016. The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 37:5 ► pp. 1253 ff. DOI logo
Hopp, Holger
2017. Cross-linguistic lexical and syntactic co-activation in L2 sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
HOPP, HOLGER
2017. Individual differences in L2 parsing and lexical representations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Hopp, Holger
2022. Second Language Sentence Processing. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.