Introduction published in:
Parsing to Learn
Edited by Laurent Dekydtspotter and Claire Renaud
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:2] 2014
► pp. 192–221

[ p. 192 ]Examining the impact of task demands on morphological variability in native and non-native Spanish

| University of Kansas
| University of Kansas
The study tests representational and computational accounts of morphological variability in English-speaking learners of Spanish by examining performance on gender and number agreement under different task demands. Second language (L2) learners took either a Speeded grammaticality judgment task (GJT) or an Untimed GJT. The tasks targeted agreement violations of two types: errors in the use of ‘default’ morphology and errors involving ‘feature clashes’ (McCarthy, 2008). In addition, three groups of native speakers took the Speeded GJT at three different presentation rates to examine whether native speakers under a processing burden perform similarly to learners. Natives in the fastest speed performed better with feature clash errors for both gender and number. Learners showed the same pattern for number, but performed better with default errors in gender, suggesting different effects of processing demands for properties unique to the L2. On the Untimed GJT, a subset of advanced learners showed perfect performance with both gender and number.
Keywords: L2 Spanish, L2 morphological variability, gender and number agreement, markedness, task demands, default morphology.
Published online: 27 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.2.03lop
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Alemán Bañón, José, Robert Fiorentino, Alison Gabriele & Carrie Jackson
2018. Using event-related potentials to track morphosyntactic development in second language learners: The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish. PLOS ONE 13:7 ► pp. e0200791 ff. Crossref logo
Bañón, José Alemán, David Miller & Jason Rothman
2020. EXAMINING THE CONTRIBUTION OF MARKEDNESS TO THE L2 PROCESSING OF SPANISH PERSON AGREEMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Beatty‐Martínez, Anne L., Michelle R. Bruni, María Teresa Bajo & Paola E. Dussias
2020. Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers. Psychophysiology Crossref logo
CHRABASZCZ, ANNA & KIRA GOR
2017. Quantifying contextual effects in second language processing of phonolexically ambiguous and unambiguous words. Applied Psycholinguistics 38:4 ► pp. 909 ff. Crossref logo
Covey, Lauren, Alison Gabriele & Robert Fiorentino
2018. Can learners use morphosyntactic cues to facilitate processing? Evidence from a study of gender agreement in Hindi. Language Acquisition 25:3 ► pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Mark Black, Rodica Frimu & Amber Rae Panwitz
2018.  In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55], ► pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Han, Jeong-Im & Sujin Oh
2018. The Role of Phonetic Similarity and Orthographic Information in Asymmetrical Lexical Encoding in Second Language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:5 ► pp. 1015 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2016. Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 32:2 ► pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger & Mayra E. León Arriaga
2016. Structural and inherent case in the non-native processing of Spanish: Constraints on inflectional variability. Second Language Research 32:1 ► pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Martohardjono, Gita & Elaine C. Klein
2017.  In The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ► pp. 653 ff. Crossref logo
Tan, Maryann & Anouschka Foltz
2020. Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Acuña-Fariña, J. C.
(2009) The linguistics and psycholinguistics of agreement: A tutorial over-view. Lingua, 119(3), 389–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alemán-Bañón, J., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A.
(2012) The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bader, M., & Meng, M.
(1999) Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(2), 121–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M.
(2005) Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Battistella, E.
(1990) Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(2003) Learners’ competence may be more accurate than we think: Spanish L2 and agreement morphology. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 17–23). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L.
(2002) The L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux, & J. M. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection (pp. 153–178). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, V.
(2000) Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2), 319–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowper, E.
(2005) The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language, 81(1), 10–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F.
(2005) Fossilized second language grammars: The acquisition of grammatical gender. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C.
(2012) Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 226–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabriele, A., Fiorentino, R., & Alemán Bañón, J.
(2013) Examining second language development using event-related potentials: A cross-sectional study on the processing of gender and number agreement. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 213–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M.
(2010) Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1870–1887. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H.
(1994) Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy. In A. Carnie, & H. Harley (Eds.), MITWPL 21: Papers on phonology and morphology (pp. 275–288). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Harley, H., & Noyer, R.
(1999) Distributed morphology. Glot International, 4(4), 3–9.[ p. 218 ]Google Scholar
Harley, H., & Ritter, E.
(2002) Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry. In H. Simon, & H. Wiese (Eds.), Pronouns: Features and representation (pp. 23–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R.
(2001) The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 345–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Casillas, G.
(2008) Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118(4), 595–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y -H.
(1997) The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. D.
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua, 120(4), 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D.
(2009) Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59(3), 503–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, C.
(2007) Morphological variability in second language Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Crossref
(2008) Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24(4), 459–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Modeling morphological variation and development: Person and number in L2 Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(1), 25–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L.
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 381–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meng, M., & Bader, M.
(2000) Ungrammaticality detection and garden-path strength: Evidence for serial parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 615–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2005) Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21(3), 199–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote R., & Perpiñán, S.
(2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553. Crossref[ p. 219 ]Google Scholar
Picallo, M. C.
(1991) Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus, 3(3), 279–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 110–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renaud, C.
(2010) On the nature of agreement in English-French acquisition: A processing investigation in the verbal and nominal domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Crossref
(2011) Processing gender: The case of pronouns and adjectives in L2 French. In J. Herschensohn, & D. Tanner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 121–134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2012) An investigation of the role of gender in the resolution of pronouns in French. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 512–524). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, E.
(1993) Where is gender? Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4), 795–803.Google Scholar
Sato, M.
(2007) Sensitivity to syntactic and semantic information in second language sentence processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Schlesewsky, M., & Frisch, S.
(2003) Nominative case as a multidimensional default. In S. Fischer, R. van de Vijver, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Experimental studies in linguistics 1 (pp. 61–72). Potsdam, Germany: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí-Antonín, M. A., Carreiras-Valiña, M. F., & Cuetos-Vega, F.
(2000) LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliaferri, B.
(2005) Paradigm [Computer software]. Perception Research Systems, Inc. Available from www​.perceptionresearchsystems​.com CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teschner, R. V., & Russell, W. M.
(1984) The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: An inverse dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics, 1(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I., & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
(2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, R., & Frisch, S.
(2003) The resolution of case conflicts: A pilot study. In S. Fischer, R. van de Vijver, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Experimental studies in linguistics 1 (pp. 91–103). Potsdam, Germany: University of Potsdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M., & McElree, B.
(2011) Memory for linguistic features: Evidence from the dynamics of agreement. Retrieved on 14 August 2013 from University of California Santa Cruz, Matt Wagers Web site: http://​people​.ucsc​.edu​/~mwagers​/work​.shtml Google Scholar
Wagers, M., Lau, E., Stroud, C., McElree, B., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Encoding syntactic predictions: Evidence from the dynamics of agreement. Paper presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference 22, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y.-K. I.
(2004) Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 105–133. Crossref[ p. 220 ]Google Scholar