To be specified published in:
Parsing to Learn
Edited by Laurent Dekydtspotter and Claire Renaud
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:2] 2014
► pp. 257282
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction [Studies in Bilingualism, 62], Crossref logo
2017. Memory retrieval and sentence processing: Differences between native and non-native speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4  pp. 657 ff. Crossref logo
Bañón, José Alemán, David Miller & Jason Rothman
Bosch, Sina, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen
2019. Inflectional morphology in bilingual language processing: An age-of-acquisition study. Language Acquisition 26:3  pp. 339 ff. Crossref logo
Brouwer, Susanne, Simone Sprenger & Sharon Unsworth
2017. Processing grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 159  pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo
Brouwer, Susanne, Deniz Özkan & Aylin C. Küntay
2017.  In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52],  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
2017. The effect of implicit causality and consequentiality on nonnative pronoun resolution. Applied Psycholinguistics 38:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
2019. A Bayesian approach to establishing coreference in second language discourse: Evidence from implicit causality and consequentiality verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3  pp. 456 ff. Crossref logo
Chow, Wing-Yee, Ellen Lau, Suiping Wang & Colin Phillips
2018. Wait a second! delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:7  pp. 803 ff. Crossref logo
2017. Quantifying contextual effects in second language processing of phonolexically ambiguous and unambiguous words. Applied Psycholinguistics 38:4  pp. 909 ff. Crossref logo
Chun, Eunjin & Edith Kaan
2019. L2 Prediction during complex sentence processing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 3:2  pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
Chung, Wonil & Myung-Kwan Park
2017. Korean L2 English Learners’ Processing of Sluicing Interacting with Reflexive Resolution: A Self-paced Reading Study. Studies in Generative Grammar 27:1  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Chung, Wonil & Myung-Kwan Park
2017. Multiple Sluicing and SWIPING Meet RT-based Experimental Syntax. Studies in Linguistics null:42  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Covey, Lauren, Alison Gabriele & Robert Fiorentino
2018. Can learners use morphosyntactic cues to facilitate processing? Evidence from a study of gender agreement in Hindi. Language Acquisition 25:3  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
2017. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4  pp. 659 ff. Crossref logo
Curcic, Maja, Sible Andringa & Folkert Kuiken
2019. The Role of Awareness and Cognitive Aptitudes in L2 Predictive Language Processing. Language Learning 69  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Dean, Christopher & Jorge Valdés Kroff
2017. Cross-Linguistic Orthographic Effects in Late Spanish/English Bilinguals. Languages 2:4  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Mark Black, Rodica Frimu & Amber Rae Panwitz
2018.  In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent & Hyun-Kyoung Seo
2017. TRANSITIVITY IN THE PROCESSING OF INTRANSITIVE CLAUSES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3  pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo
Di Pisa, Grazia, Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares & Jason Rothman
2021. Brain, mind and linguistic processing insights into the dynamic nature of bilingualism and its outcome effects. Journal of Neurolinguistics 58  pp. 100965 ff. Crossref logo
2017. Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:5  pp. 917 ff. Crossref logo
Dijkgraaf, Aster, Robert J. Hartsuiker & Wouter Duyck
2019. Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34:7  pp. 881 ff. Crossref logo
Dussias, Paola E., Jorge R. Valdés Kroff, Anne L. Beatty-Martínez & Michael A. Johns
2019.  In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism,  pp. 467 ff. Crossref logo
Foltz, Anouschka
2020. USING PROSODY TO PREDICT UPCOMING REFERENTS IN THE L1 AND THE L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Foucart, Alice
2015.  Prediction is a question of experience . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo
Foucart, Alice, Xavier Garcia, Meritxell Ayguasanosa, Guillaume Thierry, Clara Martin & Albert Costa
2015. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia 75  pp. 291 ff. Crossref logo
Frank, Stefan L.
2020. Toward Computational Models of Multilingual Sentence Processing. Language Learning Crossref logo
Giannelli, Francesco & Nicola Molinaro
2018. Reanalyzing language expectations: Native language knowledge modulates the sensitivity to intervening cues during anticipatory processing. Psychophysiology 55:10  pp. e13196 ff. Crossref logo
Goldberg, Adele E.
2018. The sufficiency principle hyperinflates the price of productivity. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:6  pp. 727 ff. Crossref logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, K. Jonas Brännström, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2018. Neural processing of morphosyntactic tonal cues in second-language learners. Journal of Neurolinguistics 45  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Gosselke Berthelsen, Sabine, Merle Horne, Yury Shtyrov & Mikael Roll
2020. Different neural mechanisms for rapid acquisition of words with grammatical tone in learners from tonal and non-tonal backgrounds: ERP evidence. Brain Research 1729  pp. 146614 ff. Crossref logo
Grüter, Theres, Elaine Lau & Wenyi Ling
2020. How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: the role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:2  pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Grüter, Theres & Hannah Rohde
2020. Limits on expectation-based processing: Use of grammatical aspect for co-reference in L2. Applied Psycholinguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Grüter, Theres, Hannah Rohde & Amy J. Schafer
2017. Coreference and discourse coherence in L2. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:2  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Hartsuiker, Robert J.
2018.  In The Listening Bilingual,  pp. 86 ff. Crossref logo
Hed, Anna, Andrea Schremm, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2019. Neural correlates of second language acquisition of tone-grammar associations. The Mental Lexicon 14:1  pp. 98 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2015.  Differential learning of prediction. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 476 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2020. Morphosyntactic adaptation in adult L2 processing: Exposure and the processing of case and tense violations. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:3  pp. 627 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger & Natalia Lemmerth
2018. LEXICAL AND SYNTACTIC CONGRUENCY IN L2 PREDICTIVE GENDER PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:1  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
2018. A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:2  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Jackson, Carrie
2020.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics,  pp. 689 ff. Crossref logo
Jackson, Carrie N. & Holger Hopp
2020. Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:5-6  pp. 895 ff. Crossref logo
Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2020. The processing of input with differential object marking by heritage Spanish speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:2  pp. 274 ff. Crossref logo
Jessen, Anna & Claudia Felser
2019. Reanalysing object gaps during non-native sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs. Second Language Research 35:2  pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo
Jessen, Anna, Julia Festman, Oliver Boxell & Claudia Felser
2017. Native and Non-native Speakers’ Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:5  pp. 1319 ff. Crossref logo
Johnson Fowler, Courtney & Carrie N. Jackson
2017. Facilitating morphosyntactic and semantic prediction among second language speakers of German. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29:8  pp. 883 ff. Crossref logo
Kaan, Edith
2015.  Knowing without predicting, predicting without learning. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 482 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Priming and adaptation in native speakers and second-language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:2  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo
2016. Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kasparian, Kristina & Karsten Steinhauer
2016. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition. Neuropsychologia 93  pp. 200 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo
2018. Second Language Processing of Korean Floating Numeral Quantifiers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:5  pp. 1101 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Theres Grüter
2020. PREDICTIVE PROCESSING OF IMPLICIT CAUSALITY IN A SECOND LANGUAGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Yangon Rah
2019. Constructional Processing in a Second Language: The Role of Constructional Knowledge in Verb‐Construction Integration. Language Learning 69:4  pp. 1022 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Hyunwoo, Gyu-Ho Shin & Haerim Hwang
Leal, Tania, Roumyana Slabakova & Thomas A. Farmer
2017. THE FINE-TUNING OF LINGUISTIC EXPECTATIONS OVER THE COURSE OF L2 LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3  pp. 493 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
2020. Slowly but surely: Interpreting facilitates L2 morphological anticipation based on suprasegmental and segmental information. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:4  pp. 752 ff. Crossref logo
Lundquist, Björn & Øystein A. Vangsnes
2018. Language Separation in Bidialectal Speakers: Evidence From Eye Tracking. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Martin, Clara D., Francesca M. Branzi & Moshe Bar
2018. Prediction is Production: The missing link between language production and comprehension. Scientific Reports 8:1 Crossref logo
Martin, Clara D., Xavier Garcia, Audrey Breton, Guillaume Thierry & Albert Costa
2016. World knowledge integration during second language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31:2  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
McManus, Kevin
2021. Examining the effectiveness of language-switching practice for reducing cross-language competition in L2 grammatical processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:1  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
2017. Incremental comprehension of Japanese passives: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Applied Psycholinguistics 38:4  pp. 953 ff. Crossref logo
Mitsugi, Sanako
2020. Generating predictions based on semantic categories in a second language: A case of numeral classifiers in Japanese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 58:3  pp. 323 ff. Crossref logo
2016. The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:1  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Molinaro, Nicola, Francesco Giannelli, Sendy Caffarra & Clara Martin
2017. Hierarchical levels of representation in language prediction: The influence of first language acquisition in highly proficient bilinguals. Cognition 164  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Montero-Melis, Guillermo & T. Florian Jaeger
2020. Changing expectations mediate adaptation in L2 production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:3  pp. 602 ff. Crossref logo
Patel, Aniruddh D. & Emily Morgan
2017. Exploring Cognitive Relations Between Prediction in Language and Music. Cognitive Science 41  pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Perdomo, Michelle & Edith Kaan
2019. Prosodic cues in second-language speech processing: A visual world eye-tracking study. Second Language Research  pp. 026765831987919 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Vocabulary size and native speaker self-identification influence flexibility in linguistic prediction among adult bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:6  pp. 1439 ff. Crossref logo
Phillips, Colin & Lara Ehrenhofer
2015.  The role of language processing in language acquisition . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 409 ff. Crossref logo
2019. The nature of first and second language processing: The role of cognitive control and L2 proficiency during text-level comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:5  pp. 930 ff. Crossref logo
Robenalt, Clarice & Adele E. Goldberg
2016. Nonnative Speakers Do Not Take Competing Alternative Expressions Into Account the Way Native Speakers Do. Language Learning 66:1  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Roberts, Leah
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning,  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
2018. Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?. Second Language Research 34:1  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
2018. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:2  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Ryskin, Rachel, Roger P. Levy & Evelina Fedorenko
2020. Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward. Neuropsychologia 136  pp. 107258 ff. Crossref logo
Schimke, Sarah, Israel de la Fuente, Barbara Hemforth & Saveria Colonna
2018. First Language Influence on Second Language Offline and Online Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution. Language Learning 68:3  pp. 744 ff. Crossref logo
Schremm, Andrea, Anna Hed, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2017. Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: Prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of tone-suffix associations. Computers & Education 114  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
Shain, Cory, Idan Asher Blank, Marten van Schijndel, William Schuler & Evelina Fedorenko
2020. fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia 138  pp. 107307 ff. Crossref logo
Tachihara, Karina & Adele E. Goldberg
2020. Reduced Competition Effects and Noisier Representations in a Second Language. Language Learning 70:1  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Ullman, Michael T., F. Sayako Earle, Matthew Walenski & Karolina Janacsek
2020. The Neurocognition of Developmental Disorders of Language. Annual Review of Psychology 71:1  pp. 389 ff. Crossref logo
Vafaee, Payman, Yuichi Suzuki & Ilina Kachisnke
2017. VALIDATING GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENT TESTS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:1  pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
van Bergen, Geertje & Monique Flecken
2017. Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language 92  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
van Rijswijk, Remy, Antje Muntendam & Ton Dijkstra
2017. Focus in Dutch reading: an eye-tracking experiment with heritage speakers of Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32:8  pp. 984 ff. Crossref logo
Wei, Hang, Julie E. Boland, Jonathan Brennan, Fang Yuan, Min Wang & Chi Zhang
2018. Lexicalized structural priming in second language online sentence comprehension. Second Language Research 34:3  pp. 395 ff. Crossref logo
Wlotko, Edward W. & Kara D. Federmeier
2015. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex 68  pp. 20 ff. Crossref logo
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries
2019. Particle Placement in Learner Language. Language Learning 69:4  pp. 873 ff. Crossref logo
Yuree Noh & Miseon Lee
2016. Effects of Vocabulary Size on Anticipatory Sentence Processing in Korean Learners of English. Korean Journal of Linguistics 41:3  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Zirnstein, Megan, Janet G. van Hell & Judith F. Kroll
2018. Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognition 176  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Özge, Duygu
2016.  In The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 20],  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Abney, S. P., & Johnson, M.
(1991) Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(3), 233–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y.
(1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirkovic, J.
(2009) Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33 (4), 583–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bar, M.
(2009) The proactive brain: memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1235–1243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
(1981) Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences conference on native and foreign language acquisition (pp. 190–214). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Besson, M., Faita, F., Czternasty, C., & Kutas, M.
(1997) What’s in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences. Biological Psychology, 46(1), 3–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boland, J. E.
(2005) Visual arguments. Cognition, 95(3), 237–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Carlson, G. N.
(1995) Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 774–806. Crossref[ p. 276 ]Google Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A.
(2012) Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H.
(2009) Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K.
(2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chow, W.-Y., Phillips, C., & Wang, S.
(2012) Turning the ‘Dumb N400’ into the ‘Smart N400’: What role-reversed sentences tell us about the time course of predictions. Talk presented at CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A.
(2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D.
(1985) How can grammars help parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. C., & Corley, M. M. B.
(1996) Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J. E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145–187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dahan, D., Swingley, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S.
(2000) Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 465–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dallas, A. C.
(2008) Influences of verbal properties on second-language filler-gap resolution: A cross-methodological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(2006) The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 33–40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M.
(2012) Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading. Brain and Language, 121(3), 226–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M.
(2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, M. W., Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K.
(2007) Real-time comprehension of wh-movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language, 100(1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K.
(2009) Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(6), 563–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B.
(1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518. Crossref[ p. 277 ]Google Scholar
Dikker, S., & Pylkkänen, L.
(2013) Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language, 127, 55–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., & Pylkkänen, L.
(2010) Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychological Science, 21(5), 629–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L.
(2009) Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110(3), 293–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R.
(2008) Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologia, 128, 501–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Marful, A., Gerfen, C., & Bajo, M. T.
(2010) Usage frequencies of complement-taking verbs in Spanish and English: Data from Spanish monolinguals and Spanish—English bilinguals. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1004–1011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N.
(2007) The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 101–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C.
(2013) When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. L.
(1991) Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7(2–3), 195–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F.
(2011) Implicit context-specific learning leads to rapid shifts in syntactic expectations. In L. Carlson, C. Holscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2055–2060). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R.
(2010) Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115(3), 149–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M.
(2002) The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(02), 133–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I.
(2012) Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(03), 571–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2012) The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 67–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., Foucart, A., & Engelhardt, P. E.
(2013) Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 165–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A.
(1979) Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flett, S., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J.
(2013) Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, FirstView, 1–10. Crossref[ p. 278 ]Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J.
(1997) Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 50(1), 119–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E. M., & Lotocky, M. A.
(1997) The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E.
(1998) Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, Language, Brain (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E., Steams, L., Bergen, L., Eddy, M., & Fedorenko, E.
(2013) The P600 indexes rational error correction within a noisy-channel model of human communication. Talk presented at The 26th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L.-A. R.
(2004) What Is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 246–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C.
(2008) More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(7), 87–814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K.
(2005) Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1220–1234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K.
(2011) Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The Frequency-Lag Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(2), 186–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S.
(2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A.
(2012) Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., & Rohde, H.
(2013) L2 processing is affected by RAGE: Evidence from reference resolution. Talk presented at the 12th conference on Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA), University of Florida, FL.Google Scholar
Hahne, A.
(2001) What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 30, 251–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D.
(2001) Processing a second language: late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, J.
(2006) Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 609–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zachs, R.
(2008) Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 227–249). New York: Oxford University Press. Crossref[ p. 279 ]Google Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2009) The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and online performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 463–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G.
(2009) The role of native language in second-language syntactic processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Dundee.
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E.
(2013) Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Dallas, A. C., & Wijnen, F.
(2010) Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing. In J.-W. Zwart, & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved. Festschrift in the honor of Jan Koster (pp. 207–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L.
(2003a) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M.
(2003b) Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 37–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, A. E., & Gilley, P. M.
(2013) Neural mechanisms of rapid sensitivity to syntactic anomaly. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R.
(2013) Predicting meaning: What the brain tells us about the architecture of language comprehension. Talk presented at the 26th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J.
(2011) A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lau, E., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C.
(2006) The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E.-K., Lu, D. H.-Y., & Garnsey, S. M.
(2013) L1 word order and sensitivity to verb bias in L2 processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 761–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, R.
(2008) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, R., & Gibson, E.
(2013) Surprisal, the PDC, and the primary locus of processing difficulty in relative clauses. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A.
(2010) Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 447–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C.
(2013) How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmuttter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(1994) Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. Crossref[ p. 280 ]Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E.
(1989) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2005) Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A.
(2013) Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Garcia, M. T., & Wulff, S.
(2012) Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22 (2), 225–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J.
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R. K., Singh, N., Pandey, A., & Huettig, F.
(2012) Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eyemovements are modulated by reading ability: Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5 (1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barraza, P., & Carreiras, M.
(2013) Long-range neural synchronization supports fast and efficient reading: EEG correlates of processing expected words in sentences. NeuroImage, 72(0), 120–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, C., Arai, M., & Mazuka, R.
(2012) Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure. Cognition, 125 (2), 317–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B.
(2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constaints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 563–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A.
(2009) Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C.
(2007) Reading ablility: lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific studies of reading, 11(4), 357–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C., & Hart, L.
(2001) The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection. Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2011) The use of prediction to drive alignment in dialogue. In G. R. Semin, & G. Echterhoff (Eds.), Grounding sociality. Neurons, mind and culture (pp. 175–191). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
(2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilk, M.
(2011) Structural nativization in Indian English lexicogrammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova, A., & Conklin, K.
(2008) Processing of binomials in sentence contexts by monolinguals and proficient bilinguals: Evidence from response times and eye-tracking. Talk presented at 21st Annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, Chapel Hill, NC.[ p. 281 ]Google Scholar
Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N.
(2008) L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(429–458). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slevc, L. R., & Novick, J. M.
(2013) Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 373–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M.
(1999) Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J.
(1998) Integration of visuospatial and linguistic information: Language comprehension in real-time and realspace. In P. Olivier, & K. Gapp (Eds.), Representation and processing of spatial expressions (pp. 201–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V.
(1999) Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10 (3), 281–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, L. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Carlson, G. N.
(1991) Filling gaps on-line: use of lexical and semantic information in sentence processing. Language and Speech, 34, 319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, R. S., & Sedivy, J.
(2003) The time-course of processing syntactic dependencies: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(2), 143–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabor, W., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(1999) Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 491–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P.
(2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, J., & Dijkstra, T.
(2002) Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 780–789. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Heugten, M., Dahan, D., Johnson, E. K., & Christophe, A.
(2012) Accommodating syntactic violations during online speech perception. Poster presented at the 25th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J.
(2012) Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M. W., & Phillips, C.
(2013) Going the distance: Memory and decision-making in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A.
(2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W.
(2006) The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99(2), B63–B72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M.
(2003) Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39(3), 483–508. Crossref[ p. 282 ]Google Scholar
(2004) Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. P., & Garnsey, S. M.
(2009) Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(3), 368–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D.
(2012) Age-related changes in the impact of contextual strength on multiple aspects of sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 49, 770–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wlotko, E. W., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M.
(2012) To predict or not to predict: Age-related differences in the use of sentential context. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 975–988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Lester, N., & Martinez-Garcia, M. T.
in press). That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English. Language and Cognition.