References (16)
References
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 221, 499–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege J. E. (2009). Give input a chance! In T. Piske, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 175–190). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitive Psychology, 211, 60–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1995) Age before beauty. Johnson and Newport revisited. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 219–231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S., Long, M., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 91, 573–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 121, 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In T. Piske, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 159–174). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 1–40). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C., & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 441, 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2009). Maturation: For better or for worse? Peer commentary on J. Meisel, (2009), Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 281, 41–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M. (2011). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2005). Syntactic optionality at interfaces. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 46–111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. (this volume). Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
. (2006). The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as native and second language. In S. Unsworth, T. Parody, A. Sorace, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Paths ofDevelopment in L1 and L2 Acquisition: In Honor of Bonnie D. Schwarz. Language Acquisitionand Language Disorders (Vol. 391, pp. 15–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2013). Assessing age of onset effects in (early) child L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 201, 74–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I.M. (2014). On the role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 351, 765–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Agustín Llach, Maria Pilar
2017. The effects of the CLIL approach in young foreign language learners’ lexical profiles. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20:5  pp. 557 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.