Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.30–61

Tense, aspect, and agreement in heritage Labrador Inuttitut

Do receptive bilinguals understand functional morphology?

| Carleton University
Heritage receptive bilinguals (RBs) are individuals who report understanding but not speaking their family language. This study tests whether semantic features of functional morphemes, namely tense, aspect, and agreement markers, are accessible to them in comprehension. RBs in this study are fluent speakers of English with receptive knowledge of Labrador Inuttitut. Many RBs showed fluent-like comprehension of aspectual suffixes, subject-object-verb agreement suffixes, and past versus future contrasts in tense suffixes, but most could not identify remoteness degrees in tense suffixes. Lowest-proficiency RBs did not show knowledge of any morphemes. Remoteness features are missing from most RBs’ grammars; the same applies to many features in LRBs’ grammars. Some RBs showed inconsistent performance: better than chance, but worse than fluent speakers. The corresponding parts of RBs’ grammars are therefore fluent-like, but access to them is difficult. RBs’ grammars consist of fluent-like parts, parts with reduced access, and incomplete parts.
Keywords: Inuktitut, receptive bilinguals, heritage language, attrition, tense, aspect, agreement
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Data analysis
  • 3.Tense
    • 3.1Background
    • 3.2Materials
    • 3.3Results
    • 3.4Discussion
  • 4.Aspect
    • 4.1Background
    • 4.2Materials
    • 4.3Results
    • 4.4Discussion
  • 5.Agreement
    • 5.1Background
    • 5.2Materials
    • 5.3Results: Agreement
    • 5.4Discussion
  • 6.General discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.1.02she
References (37)
References
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., & Saadah, E. (2011). Grammatical features of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic heritage speakers’ oral production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 273–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, C. (2009). A sociolinguistic survey of language behaviours and attitudes in Nain, Nunatsiavut. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, NL.
Andersen, C., & Johns, A. (2005). Labrador Inuttitut: Speaking into the future. Études/Inuit/Studies, 291, 187–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Au, T.K., Knightly, L.M., Jun, S.A., & Oh, J.S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13(3), 238–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2010). White paper: Prolegomena to heritage linguistics. Ms., Harvard University.
Bittner, M. (2005). Future discourse in a tenseless language. Journal of Semantics, 22(4), 339–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, S. (2009). The manifestation of viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut. Studia Linguistica, 63(3), 292–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowper, E. (1998). The simple present tense in English: A unified treatment. Studia Linguistica, 52(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crago, M., & Allen, S.E.M. (2001). Early finiteness in Inuktitut: The role of language structure and input. Language Acquisition, 9(1), 59–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N.C. (2006). Negative borrowing in an indigenous language shift to the dominant national language. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(5), 557–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenyvesi, A. (2000). The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In A. Fenyvesi, & K. Sándor (Eds.), Language contact and the verbal complex of Dutch and Hungarian: Working papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact, November 11-13, 1999, Szeged, Hungary (pp. 94–107). Szeged: JGyTF Press.Google Scholar
Filip, H. (1999). Aspect, eventuality types and noun phrase semantics. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M., Jakobson, S., & Kaplan, L. (1994). Comparative Eskimo dictionary (with Aleut cognates). Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M. (2011). The structure of multiple tenses in Inuktitut. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT NR77704).
Jakobson, R. (1941). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. English translation reprinted in 1968. Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (1995). On some mood alternations in Labrador Inuttut. In C. Burgess, K. Dziwirek, & D. Gerdts (Eds.), Grammatical relations: Theoretical approaches to empirical questions (pp. 131–151). Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
. (2001). An inclination towards accusative. Linguistica Atlantica, 231, 127–144.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. (2010). The syntax-pragmatics interface in language loss: Covert restructuring of aspect in heritage Russian. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT 3408406).
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinction in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 51, 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Navarro, S. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: what is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual Y. Cabo, D. & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (1997). American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition. In W. Browne, E. Dornisch, N. Kondrashova, & D. Zec (Eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell meeting 1995 (pp. 370–406). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic.Google Scholar
. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 141, 191–262.Google Scholar
. (2008). Without aspect. In G. Corbett, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Case and grammatical relations (pp. 263–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language: New evidence in support of attrition. Studies in Second Language, 33(2), 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M., & Sanchez, L. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaer, B. (2003). Towards the tenseless analysis of a tenseless language. Proceedings of SULA, 21, 139–156.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. (2010). Comprehension of functional morphemes by Labrador Inuttitut receptive bilinguals. In K. Franich, K.M. Iserman, & L.L. Keli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 34 (pp. 351–362). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. (2011). Comprehension of Labrador Inuttitut functional morphology by receptive bilinguals. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT NR78022).
Sherkina-Lieber, M., Perez-Leroux, A., & Johns, A. (2011). Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 301–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalan, C. (2003). Linguistic consequences of reduced input in bilingual first language acquisition. In S. Montrul, & F. Ordonez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp. 375–397). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1978). A survey of the derivational postbases of Labrador Inuttut (Eskimo). Ottawa: National Museums of Canada. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swift, M. (2004). Time in child Inuktitut: A developmental study of an Eskimo-Aleut language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdes, G. (2000). Spanish for native speakers. AATSP professional development series, handbook for teachers K-12. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Pathak, Lekhnath Sharma, Mila Vulchanova, Poshak Pathak & Ramesh Kumar Mishra
2024. Trilingual parallel processing: Do the dominant languages grab all the attention?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Thane, Patrick D.
2023. Frequency matters in second language acquisition too! Frequency effects in the production of preterit morphology with state verbs in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Lingua 295 ► pp. 103611 ff. DOI logo
Thane, Patrick D.
2024. Frequency effects and aspect morphology with state verbs in heritage Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:5 ► pp. 640 ff. DOI logo
Anstatt, Tanja & Ursula Mikić
2022. What does a receptive bilingual understand? Evidence from Polish as a heritage language in Germany. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 67:3 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova
2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
D'Alessandro, Roberta, David Natvig & Michael T. Putnam
2021. Addressing Challenges in Formal Research on Moribund Heritage Languages: A Path Forward. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Giancaspro, David & Liliana Sánchez
2021. <i>Me, mi, my</i>: Innovation and variability in heritage speakers’ knowledge of inalienable possession. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Ionin, Tania
2021. Semantics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 668 ff. DOI logo
Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2021. The Psycholinguistics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Nagy, Naomi
2021. Heritage Languages in Canada. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Putnam, Michael T., Lara Schwarz & Andrew D. Hoffman
2021. Morphology of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 613 ff. DOI logo
Gooskens, Charlotte & Vincent J. van Heuven
2020. How well can intelligibility of closely related languages in Europe be predicted by linguistic and non-linguistic variables?. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:3 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Holmes, Bonnie C. & Michael T. Putnam
2020. Mental representations in receptive multilingual grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:3 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Polinsky, Maria & Gregory Scontras
2020. Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Sherkina-Lieber, Marina
2020. A classification of receptive bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:3 ► pp. 412 ff. DOI logo
Dragoy, Olga, Ekaterina Virfel, Anna Yurchenko & Roelien Bastiaanse
2019. Aspect and tense attrition in Russian-German bilingual speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:1 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Giancaspro, David
2019. The Late(r) Bird Gets the Verb? Effects of Age of Acquisition of English on Adult Heritage Speakers’ Knowledge of Subjunctive Mood in Spanish. Languages 4:3 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Giancaspro, David
2020. Not in the mood. In Lost in Transmission [Studies in Bilingualism, 59], ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Perez-Cortes, Silvia, Michael T. Putnam & Liliana Sánchez
2019. Differential Access: Asymmetries in Accessing Features and Building Representations in Heritage Language Grammars. Languages 4:4 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Sherkina-Lieber, Marina & Rena Helms-Park
2015. A prototype of a receptive lexical test for a polysynthetic heritage language: The case of Inuttitut in Labrador. Language Testing 32:4 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Heritage Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 58], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 579 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Heritage Languages around the World. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.