Cited by

Cited by 48 other publications

Alemán Bañón, José & Clara Martin
2021. The role of crosslinguistic differences in second language anticipatory processing: An event-related potentials study. Neuropsychologia 155  pp. 107797 ff. Crossref logo
Ambridge, Ben, Libby Barak, Elizabeth Wonnacott, Colin Bannard, Giovanni Sala, Rolf Zwaan & Fernanda Ferreira
2018. Effects of Both Preemption and Entrenchment in the Retreat from Verb Overgeneralization Errors: Four Reanalyses, an Extended Replication, and a Meta-Analytic Synthesis. Collabra: Psychology 4:1 Crossref logo
Barrière, Isabelle, Sarah Kresh, Katsiaryna Aharodnik, Géraldine Legendre & Thierry Nazzi
2019.  In Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63],  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
CUNNINGS, IAN
2017. Interference in Native and Non-Native Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4  pp. 712 ff. Crossref logo
de Villiers, Jill
2015.  Parsing and grammar. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 459 ff. Crossref logo
de Villiers, Jill, Jessica Kotfila & Tom Roeper
2020.  In New Trends in Language Acquisition Within the Generative Perspective [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 49],  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
de Villiers, Jill G., Jessica Kotfila & Madeline Klein
2019.  In Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
DeKeyser, Robert
2015.  Why less is eventually more in second language acquisition . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 454 ff. Crossref logo
DeLuca, Vincent, David Miller, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
2019.  In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism,  pp. 170 ff. Crossref logo
Dijkgraaf, Aster, Robert J. Hartsuiker & Wouter Duyck
2019. Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34:7  pp. 881 ff. Crossref logo
Felser, Claudia
2019. Structure-sensitive constraints in non-native sentence processing. Journal of the European Second Language Association 3:1  pp. 12 ff. Crossref logo
Fernandez, Claudia
2021.  In Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction [Studies in Bilingualism, 62],  pp. 236 ff. Crossref logo
Foucart, Alice
2015.  Prediction is a question of experience . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo
Gabriele, Alison, Robert D. Fiorentino & Adrienne Johnson
2015.  Attentional control and prediction in native and non-native speakers . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 470 ff. Crossref logo
Green, Kieran & John W. Schwieter
2018. Using more native-like language acquisition processes in the foreign language classroom. Cogent Education 5:1  pp. 1429134 ff. Crossref logo
Guasti, Maria, Mirta Vernice & Julie Franck
2018. Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian. Languages 3:3  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Henry, Nick, Holger Hopp & Carrie N. Jackson
2017. Cue additivity and adaptivity in predictive processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32:10  pp. 1229 ff. Crossref logo
Henry, Nick, Carrie N Jackson & Holger Hopp
2020. Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832096315 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2015.  Differential learning of prediction. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 476 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2016. Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 32:2  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger
2020. Morphosyntactic adaptation in adult L2 processing: Exposure and the processing of case and tense violations. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:3  pp. 627 ff. Crossref logo
Hopp, Holger & Natalia Lemmerth
2018. LEXICAL AND SYNTACTIC CONGRUENCY IN L2 PREDICTIVE GENDER PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:1  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Jackson, Carrie
2020.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics,  pp. 689 ff. Crossref logo
Jackson, Carrie N. & Holger Hopp
2020. Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:5-6  pp. 895 ff. Crossref logo
Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2020. The processing of input with differential object marking by heritage Spanish speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:2  pp. 274 ff. Crossref logo
Johnson Fowler, Courtney & Carrie N. Jackson
2017. Facilitating morphosyntactic and semantic prediction among second language speakers of German. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29:8  pp. 883 ff. Crossref logo
Joo, Kum-Jeong
2017. Children’s interpretation of the Korean reflexive pronounscakiandcaki-casin. Language Acquisition 24:4  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Kaan, Edith
2015.  Knowing without predicting, predicting without learning. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 482 ff. Crossref logo
Kidd, Evan
2015.  Incorporating learning into theories of parsing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 487 ff. Crossref logo
Klassen, Gabrielle, Aline Ferreira & John W. Schwieter
2021. The role of immersion learning in the acquisition and processing of L2 gender agreement. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Lago, Sol, Martina Gračanin-Yuksek, Duygu Fatma Şafak, Orhan Demir, Bilal Kırkıcı & Claudia Felser
2019.  Straight from the horse’s mouth . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:3  pp. 398 ff. Crossref logo
Lago, Sol, Michela Mosca & Anna Stutter Garcia
2021. The Role of Crosslinguistic Influence in Multilingual Processing: Lexicon Versus Syntax. Language Learning 71:S1  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Lago, Sol, Anna Stutter Garcia & Claudia Felser
2019. The role of native and non-native grammars in the comprehension of possessive pronouns. Second Language Research 35:3  pp. 319 ff. Crossref logo
Lew-Williams, Casey
2015.  Infants’ history of distributional learning in real time . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 494 ff. Crossref logo
MARSDEN, EMMA, SOPHIE THOMPSON & LUKE PLONSKY
2018. A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:5  pp. 861 ff. Crossref logo
McManus, Kevin & Emma Marsden
2017. L1 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION CAN IMPROVE L2 ONLINE AND OFFLINE PERFORMANCE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3  pp. 459 ff. Crossref logo
Montero-Melis, Guillermo & T. Florian Jaeger
2020. Changing expectations mediate adaptation in L2 production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:3  pp. 602 ff. Crossref logo
OMAKI, AKIRA
2017. Linking learning and parsing in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4  pp. 706 ff. Crossref logo
Pozzan, Lucia & John C. Trueswell
2015.  Syntactic processing and acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 516 ff. Crossref logo
PÉREZ-LEROUX, ANA T.
2017. The untouchables. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:1  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
2018. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:2  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Schaeffer, Jeannette
2015.  On the link between complex predictive abilities and memory in language acquisition . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 522 ff. Crossref logo
Schremm, Andrea, Anna Hed, Merle Horne & Mikael Roll
2017. Training predictive L2 processing with a digital game: Prototype promotes acquisition of anticipatory use of tone-suffix associations. Computers & Education 114  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
Sekerina, Irina A.
2015.  Predictions, fast and slow . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 532 ff. Crossref logo
Shin, Gyu-Ho
2017. Developmental aspects of English argument structure constructions for Korean-speaking second language learners: Usage-based constructional approaches to language development. Ampersand 4  pp. 10 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Michael Sharwood
2015.  On virtual versus real spatio-temporal explanations of linguistic development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 537 ff. Crossref logo
Westergaard, Marit
2015.  Complexity in child and adult language acquisition . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 541 ff. Crossref logo
Xia, Vera Yunxiao, Lydia White & Natália Brambatti Guzzo
2020. Intervention in relative clauses: Effects of relativized minimality on L2 representation and processing. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832095874 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstamm, K.
(2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aldwayan, S., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A.
(2010) Evidence of syntactic constraints in the processing of wh-movement: A study of Najdi Arabic learners of English. In B. VanPatten, & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 65–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J.M., & Lieven, E.V.M.
(2014) Child language acquisition: Why Universal Grammar doesn’t help. Language: Perspectives. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aoshima, S., Yoshida, M., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Incremental processing of coreference and binding in Japanese. Syntax, 12, 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M.
(2012) Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122, 292–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, E., Simeon, K., & Omaki, A.
(2013) The time course of filler-gap dependency processing in the developing parser. Poster presented at the 26th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. Columbia, S. Carolina.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S., & Reuland, E.
(2004) Backward anaphora and tense interpretation. In L. Verbitskaya (Ed.), Teoreticheskie problemy jazykoznanija [Theoretical issues in language research]. St. Petersburg, Russia: St. Petersburg University Press.Google Scholar
Baauw, S., Escobar, M.A., & Philip, W.
(1997) A delay of Principle B effect in Spanish speaking children: The role of lexical feature acquisition. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing. Proceedings of GALA 1997. Edinburgh: HCRC.Google Scholar
Badecker, W., & Straub, K.
(2002) The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphora. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R.C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., & Chomsky, N.
(2011) Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science, 35, 1207–1242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T.G.
(1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structure. In J.R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D.
(2004) Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (eds.), Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 82–105). London: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., & Miller, C.A.
(1991) Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. Crossref[ p. 443 ]Google Scholar
Borovsky, A., Elman, J.L., & Fernald, A.
(2012) Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of experimental child psychology, 112, 417–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G., & Bock, J.K.
(2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Jäger, L., & Vasishth, S.
(2012) How structure-sensitive is the parser? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. In B. Stoltefoht, & S. Featherson (Eds.), Empirical approaches to linguistic theory: Studies in meaning and structure (pp. 43–62). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Y.C. & Wexler, K.
(1990) Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1, 225–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J.C.
(2010) Children’s (in) ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 41–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chow, W.Y., Lewis, S., & Phillips, C.
(2014) Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chow, W.Y., Lau, E.F., Wang, S., & Phillips, C.
submitted). Timing is everything: The temporal dynamics of word prediction.
Chow, W.Y., Smith, C., Lau, E.F., & Phillips, C.
(2015) A “bag of arguments” mechanism for verb prediction. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, in press.Google Scholar
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J., & Ferreira, F.
(2001) Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger. Cognitive Psychology, 368–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clackson, K., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2011) Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 128–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, C., Kennison, S.M., & Albrecht, J.E.
(1997) Reading the words her, his, him: Implications for parsing principles based on frequency and structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 276–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Deevy, P.
(1999) Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension. Rivista di linguistica, 11, 11–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, A., Takahashi, E., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 446–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, R.
(1987) Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 544–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & McKee, C.
(1985) The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 15 (pp. 94–110). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R.
(1998) Investigations in universal grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Felser, C.
(2013) The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 188–219. Crossref[ p. 444 ]Google Scholar
Davidson, M.C., Amso, D., Anderson, L.C., & Diamond, A.
(2006) Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037–2078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J.
(2004) Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M.
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty, & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K.A., Urbach, T.P., & Kutas, M.
(2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G.
(2005) Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In J. Astington & J. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 266–297). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G. & Roeper, T.
(1995) Barriers, binding, and acquisition of the DP-NP distinction. Language Acquisition, 4(1–2), 73–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., Roper, T., Bland-Stewart, L., & Pearson, B.
(2008) Answering hard questions: wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 67–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L.
(2009) Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110, 293–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B.
(2014) Syntactic memory in the comprehension of reflexive dependencies: An overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 171–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C.
(2013) Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 85–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P.E., Valdés Kroff, J.R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R.E., & Gerfen, C.
(2013) When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K.M., Cutting, J.C., & Bock, K.
(2005) Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112, 531–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, P.
(2005) On the acquisition of Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 333–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C. & Sagarra, N.
(2010) The bounds of adult language acquisition: blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 553–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J.L.
(1993) Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, P.E.
(2014) Children’s and adolescents’ processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An eye movement study. Child Development Research, 2014: Article ID 475315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, E., & Kaiser, E.
(2014) Looking back and looking forward: Anaphora and cataphora in Italian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 20, 81–90.[ p. 445 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K.D.
(2007) Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K.D., & Kutas, M.
(1999) A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I.
(2012) Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 571–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2012) The timing of island effects in non-native sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 67–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferman, S., & Karni, A.
(2010) No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule. PloS ONE, 5(10), e13648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F. & Henderson, J.M.
(1991) Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N.D.
(2007) The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischler, I., Bloom, P.A., Childers, D.G., Roucos, S.E., & Perry, N.W.
(1983) Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20, 400–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.D.
(1978) Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C.D., Moreno, E.M., & Costa, A.
(2014) Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1461–1469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L.
(1999) On sentence interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., & Flores d’Arcais, G.B.
(1989) Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E.
(1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E., & Warren, T.
(2004) Reading-Time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7, 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldowsky, B.N. & Newport, E.L.
(1993) Modeling the effects of processing limitations on the acquisition of morphology: the less is more hypothesis. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 24th annual child language research forum, 124–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P., & Hendrick, R.
(1997) Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference. Cognition, 62, 325–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goro, T.
(2007) Language-specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Goro, T., & Akiba, S.
(2004) The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A.J. Rodriguez, & B. Schmeiser (Eds.), WCCFL 23: Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 251–264). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Wiliams, C., & Fernald, A.
(2012) Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem. Second Language Research, 28, 191–215. Crossref[ p. 446 ]Google Scholar
Gualmini, A.
(2008) The rise and fall of Isomorphism. Lingua, 118, 1158–1176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T.
(2002) Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halgren, E., Dhond, R., Christensen, N., Petten, C., Marinkovic, K., Lewine, J., & Dale, A.
(2002) N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences. NeuroImage, 1101–1116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C.L., & Bates, E.A.
(2002) Clausal backgrounding and pronominal reference: A functionalist approach to c-command. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 237–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R.
(1995) Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Helenius, P., Salmelin, R., Service, E., & Connolly, J.
(1999) Semantic Cortical Activation in Dyslexic Readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 535–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, C.
(1995) Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 547–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hitzcenko, K., & Jarosz, G.
(2014) Cognitive limitations impose advantageous constraints on word segmentation. Talk at the 39th Boston University Conference on Language Development. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, P., Grainger, J., & O’Rourke, T.
(2002) An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938–950. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Individual differences in the L2 processing of object-subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics. Published online 11 April 2013. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.T.J.
(1993) Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 103–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J.
(2013) Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 589–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurewitz, F., Brown-Schmidt, S., Thorpe, K., Gleitman, L.R., & Trueswell, J.C.
(2000) One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: Factors affecting children’s syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 597–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.N., & Dussias, P.E.
(2009) Cross-linguistic differences and their impact on L2 sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C.
(2015) Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Published online January 27th, 2015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N.
(2004) Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E.
(2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257–282. Crossref[ p. 447 ]Google Scholar
Kamin, L.J.
(1969) Predictability, attention, surprise, and conditioning. In B.A. Campbell, & R.M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 276–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, D.
(1988) Grammatical and cognitive interactions in the study of children’s knowledge of binding theory and reference relations. PhD dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Kazanina, N.
(2005) The acquisition and processing of backwards anaphora. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Crossref
Kazanina, N., Lau, E., Lieberman, M., Yoshida, M., & Phillips, C.
(2007) The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 384–409. Crossref
Kazanina, N., & Phillips, C.
(2001) Coreference in child Russian: Distinguishing syntactic and discourse constraints. In A. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 413–424). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A developmental perspective on the Imperfective Paradox. Cognition, 105, 65–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Differential effects of constraints in the processing of Russian cataphora. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 371–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennison, S.M.
(2003) Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E., Stewart, A.J., & Serratrice, L.
(2011) Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: the role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38, 222–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kush, D., & Phillips, C.
(2014) Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: implications for retrieval strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D.
(2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., Van Petten, C.K., & Kluender, R.
(2006) Psycholinguistics electrified: 1994–2005. In M.A. Gernsbacher, & M. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 659–724). New York: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A.
(1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lassotta, R., Omaki, A., & Franck, J.
submitted). Developmental changes in the misinterpretation of garden-path wh-questions in French. Ms., University of Geneva and Johns Hopkins University. Crossref
Lau, E.F., Holcomb, P.J., & Kuperberg, G.K.
(2013) Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 484–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lau, E.F., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C.
(2006) The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98, 74–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lau, E.F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D.
(2008) A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933. Crossref[ p. 448 ]Google Scholar
Leddon, E. and Lidz, J.
(2006) Reconstruction Effects in Child Language. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press: Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.-W., & Williams, J.N.
(2006) The role of grammatical constraints in intra-sentential pronoun resolution. Ms., Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Levy, R.
(2008) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, F.
(2007) Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 193–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 447–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S.
(2013) Pragmatic enrichment in language processing and development. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland. Crossref
Lewis, S., & Phillips, C.
(2015) Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 27–46. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lidz, J.
(2014) Quantification and scope in child language. To appear in Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, J., Waxman, S., & Freedman, J.
(2003) What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned: experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months. Cognition, 89, 295–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, J., & Musolino, J.
(2002) Children’s command of quantification. Cognition, 84, 113–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lukyanenko, C., Conroy, A., & Lidz, J.
(2014) Is she patting Katie? Constraints on pronominal reference in 30-month-olds. Language Learning and Development, 10, 328–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Pleh, C., & Bates, E.
(1985) The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 178–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mani, N., & Huettig, F.
(2012) Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake — But only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M., Fox, D.E., Becker, J.A., & Chalkley, M.A.
(1985) Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition, 19, 167–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2005) Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C.D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A.
(2013) Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazuka, R., Jincho, N., & Oishi, H.
(2009) Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 59–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C.
(1992) A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition, 2, 21–54. Crossref[ p. 449 ]Google Scholar
Momma, S., Sakai, H., & Phillips, C.
(2015) Give me several hundred more milliseconds: The temporal dynamics of verb prediction. Talk at the 28th annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R.
(2003) Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K., Marshall, C.M., & Altmann, G.
(2003) Investigating individual differences in children’s real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 314–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E.
(1990) Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E.L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L.R.
(1977) Mother, I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In C.E. Snow, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 109–149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D.
(1989) The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M.S., & Martin, A.E.
(2012) If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension. Cognition, 122, 102–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novick, J.M., Trueswell, J.C., & Thompson-Schill, S.L.
(2005) Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 263–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A.
(2010) Commitment and flexibility in the developing parser. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland. Crossref
Omaki, A., Dyer, C., Malhotra, S., Sprouse, J., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C.
(2007) The time course of anaphoric processing and syntactic reconstruction. Talk at the 20th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C.
(2014) No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 10, 206–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Lidz, J.
(2014) Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition. Published online July 17th 2014. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B.
(2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 563–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pablos, L., Ruijgrok, B., Doetjes, J., & Cheng, L.L.-S.
submitted). Active search for antecedents in cataphoric pronoun resolution. Ms. Leiden University.
Parker, D., & Phillips, C.
(2014) Selective priority for structure in memory retrieval. Poster presentation at the 27th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Patil, U., Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R.
(2011) Early retrieval interference in syntax-guided antecedent search. Talk at the 24th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, L., Goldwater, S., & Steyvers, M.
(2010) How ideal are we? Incorporating human limitations into Bayesian models of word segmentation. In K. Franich, K. Iserman, & L. Keil (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development (pp. 315–326). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.[ p. 450 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, L., & Sprouse, J.
(2013) Syntactic islands and learning biases: Combining experimental syntax and computational modeling to investigate the language acquisition problem. Language Acquisition, 20, 23–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfors, A.
(2012) When do memory limitations lead to regularization? An experimental and computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 486–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J.B., & Regier, T.
(2011) The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118, 306–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.
(1996) Order and Structure.1996. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Crossref
(2006) The real-time status of island phenomena. Language, 82, 795–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) On the nature of island constraints II: Language learning and innateness. In J. Sprouse, & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects (pp. 132–158). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., & Lewis, S.
(2013) Derivational order in syntax: Evidence and architectural consequences. Studies in Linguistics, 6, 11–47.Google Scholar
Phillips, C., & Wagers, M.
(2007) Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics. In G. Gaskell (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 739–756). Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., Wagers, M.W., & Lau, E.F.
(2011) Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the interfaces (Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 37) (pp. 147–180). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S.
(2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D.S., & Frost, L.A.
(1987) Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, 195–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pozzan, L. & Trueswell, J.C.
(2013) Online processing of English garden-path sentences by L2 learners: A visual world study. Poster presented at the 26th annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.Columbia, SC. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G.K. & Scholz, B.C.
(2002) Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18, 9–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B.
(2007) An MEG Study of Silent Meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1905–1921. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L.
(1983) The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C.
(2011) Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 299–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, G.A.
(2008) Second language sentence processing: Is it fundamentally different? PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.[ p. 451 ] Crossref
Rohde, D.L., & Plaut, D.C.
(1999) Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small? Cognition, 72, 67–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, D.L.T., & Plaut, D.C.
(2003) Less is less in language acquisition. In P. Quinlan (Ed.), Connectionist modelling of cognitive development (pp. 189–231). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Runner, J.T., Sussman, R.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
(2006) Processing reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases. Cognitive Science, 30, 193–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J.R.
(2003) Statistical language learning mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, J.
(2013) Children’s sentence processing. In R. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 189–220). New York, New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J.C.
(2004) The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M.
(1978) The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114–1128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W.
(2007) Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L.
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speer, S.R., & Ito, K.
(2009) Prosody in first language acquisition–Acquiring intonation as a tool to organize information in conversation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 90–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staub, A., & Clifton Jr, C.
(2006) Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either… or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, L.A.
(1986) Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 227–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sturt, P.
(2003) The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition, 105, 477–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C.
(1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., Nicol, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L.
(2012) Electrophysiological markers of interference and structural facilitation in native and nonnative agreement processing. In A.K. Biller, E.Y. Chung, & A.E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 594–606). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R., & Wexler, K.
(1999) Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation in child grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G.
(2001) Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.[ p. 452 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M.J., & Pickering, M.J.
(1996) Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 454–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J.C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N.M., & Logrip, M.L.
(1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Gualmini, A., & Helder, C.
(2008) Children’s interpretation of indefinites in sentences containing negation: A reassessment of the cross-linguistic picture. Language Acquisition, 15, 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urbach, T.P. & Kutas, M.
(2010) Quantifiers more or less quantify on-line: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 158–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J.J.
(2009) The neuropragmatics of ’simple’ utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland, & K. Yatsushiro (Ed.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 276–316). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J.J., Brown, C.M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P.
(2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gompel, R.P.G., & Liversedge, S.P.
(2003) The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 128–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M.
(1990) Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S.
(2000) Lack of clitic-pronoun distinctions in the acquisition of Principle B in child Greek. In S.C. Howell, S.A Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 738–748). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J.
(1998) Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear?. Cognition, 68, B13–B29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viau, J., Lidz, J., & Musolino, J.
(2010) Priming of abstract logical representations in 4-year-olds. Language Acquisition, 17, 26–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M.W., Lau, E.F., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Bastiaansen, M., Yang, Y., & Hagoort, P.
(2012) Information structure influences depth of syntactic processing: Event-related potential evidence for the Chomsky illusion. PloS ONE, 7, e47917. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weckerly, J., Wulfeck, B., & Reilly, J.
(2004) The development of morphosyntactic ability in atypical populations: The acquisition of tag questions in children with early focal lesions and children with specific-language impairment. Brain and Language, 88, 190–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weighall, A.R.
(2008) The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 75–95. Crossref[ p. 453 ]Google Scholar
Yang, C.
(2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M., Kazanina, N., Pablos, L., & Sturt, P.
(2014) On the origin of islands. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 761–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language, 108, 40–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zukowski, A., McKeown, R., & Larsen, J.
(2008) A tough test of the locality requirement for reflexives. In H. Chan, H. Jacob, & E. Kapia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 586–597). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar