References

References

Aldwayan, S., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A.
(2010) Evidence of syntactic constraints in the processing of wh-movement: A study of Najdi Arabic learners of English. In B. Van Patten, & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research on second language processing and parsing (pp. 65–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, E., Simeon, K., & Omaki, A.
(2013) The time course of filler-gap dependency processing in the developing parser. Poster presented at the 26th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. Columbia, South Carolina.Google Scholar
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2012) The timing of island effects in non-native sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 67–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P., & Sag, I.A.
(2010) Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 86(2), 366–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P., Casasanto, L.S., & Sag, I.A.
(2012a) How do individual cognitive differences relate to acceptability judgments? A reply to Sprouse, Wagers, & Phillips. Language, 88(2), 390–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Misapplying working memory tests: A reduction ad absurdum. Language, 88(2), 390–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, K.
(2007) Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(4), 645–662.Google Scholar
Johnson, A.
(2015) Prediction in native and non-native sentence processing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas.[ p. 474 ]
Johnson, A., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A.
(2013) An examination of syntactic constraints and the role of individual differences in native and non-native processing of wh-movement. Poster presented at the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Kane, M.J., & Engle, R.W.
(2002) The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 637–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lau, E., Holcomb, P., & Kuperberg, G.
(2013) Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 484–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.W.
(2004) Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 51–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, Y., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H.
(2002) Antecedent priming at trace positions in Japanese long-distance scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 531–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., Lau, E., Davidson White, I., Dakan, M., Apple, A., & Phillips, C.
(2015) Hyper-active gap filling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B.
(2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.
(2006) The real-time status of island phenomena. Language, 82(4), 795–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L.
(2015) The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J., & Barry, G.D.
(1991) Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(3), 229–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slevc, L.R., & Novick, J.M.
(2013) Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 373–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, J., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C.
(2012a) A test of the relation between working memory capacity and syntactic island effects.. Language, 88(1), 82–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Working memory capacity and island effects: A reminder of the issues and the facts. Language, 88(2), 401–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M., & Phillips, C.
(2009) Multiple dependencies and the role of the grammar in real-time comprehension. Journal of Linguistics, 45(2), 395–433. Crossref[ p. 475 ]Google Scholar