References

References

Chater, N., & Christiansen, M.
(2010) Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34, 1131–1157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2008) A frequentist explanation for some universals of reflexive marking. Linguistic Discovery, 6, 40–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.
(2004) Anaphora and the pragmatics-syntax interface. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 288–314). Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joo, K., Deen, K., & O’Grady, W.
(2014) Acquisition of the Korean reflexive pronoun in intra-sentential binding and extra-sentential binding. Paper presented at the 39th Boston University Conference on Language Development. To appear in the Proceedings.Google Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B.
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–100.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-E., & O’Grady, W.
in press). Asymmetries in children’s production of relative clauses. Data from English and Korean. Journal of Child Language.[ p. 510 ] Crossref
O’Grady, W.
(2005) Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2015) Processing determinism. Language Learning, 65, 6–32 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C.
(2014) No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 10, 206–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y.
(2004) The development of long-distance binding for Chinese ziji revisited. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46, 249–257.Google Scholar