References (38)
References
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 319–346). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G., & Bock, J.K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 1131, 234–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 631, 544–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., & Roeper, T. (1995) Relative clauses are barriers to Wh-movement for young children. Journal of Child Language, 221, 389–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Chow, W.-Y., Wagers, M., Guo, T., Liu, F., & Phillips, C. (2014). The structure-sensitivity of memory access: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Nevins, A., Austin, A.C., & Phillips, C. (2012). Syntactic and semantic predictors of tense in Hindi: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 271, 313–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elman, J.L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 481, 71–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.D. & Sakas, W. (2005). The subset principle in syntax: Costs of compliance. Journal of Linguistics, 411, 513–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goro, T. (2007). Language-specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Grüter, T., Lew-Wiliams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem. Second Language Research, 281, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 731, 418–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P., & Sag, I. (2010). Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 861, 366–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2011). Internal and external factors in the child L2 development of the German determiner phrase. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 238–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 291, 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L.V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 611, 343–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 63–100.Google Scholar
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 573–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monner, D., Vatz, K., Morini, G., Hwang, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2013). A neural network model of the effects of entrenchment and memory development on grammatical gender learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 246–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 141, 11–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Lidz, J. (2015). Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition, 221, 158–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2014). No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 101, 206–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B.D., & Clahsen, H. (2004). On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Linguistics, 421, 669–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. (2010). Syntax at age two: Cross-linguistic differences. Language Acquisition, 171, 70–120. [Originally published 1995 in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 26.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Some arguments and non-arguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes, 281, 156–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., Wagers, M.W., & Lau, E.F. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the Interfaces (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 371), (pp. 147–180). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 71, 217–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1989). Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 351, 185–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In M. García Mayo, M. Junkal Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrían (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, J. (2013). Children’s sentence processing. In R. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 189–220). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2011). Children’s grammatical conservatism: Implications for syntactic theory. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference in Language Development (Vol. 11, pp. 1–20). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. (1990). Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut. DOI logo
Trueswell, J.C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N.M., & Logrip, M.L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 731, 89–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, P.C.M., & Perrachione, T.K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 565–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zukowski, A., & Larsen, J. (2011). Wanna-contraction in children: Retesting and revising the developmental facts. Language Acquisition, 181, 211–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

CUNNINGS, IAN
2017. Interference in Native and Non-Native Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4  pp. 712 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.