Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory” by Diane Lillo-Martin, Ronice Müller de Quadros and Deborah Chen Pichler
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6] 2016
► pp. 756–759
Commentary

Code-blending and Distributed Morphology

| Humboldt Universität zu Berlin & Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin
Published online: 17 January 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.6.6.02ale
References (8)
References
Borer, H. (2013). Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Belder, M., & van Craenenbroeck, J. (2015). How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry, 46, 625–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick. D. (2000). Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry, 311: 185–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, D. (2010). Localism and globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, J., & Siddiqi, D. (2013). Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 44, 493–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krämer, R. 2015. The morpho-syntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Müller de Quadros, R., & Chen Pichler, D. (2016). The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(6), 719–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar