Commentary published in:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory” by Diane Lillo-Martin, Ronice Müller de Quadros and Deborah Chen Pichler
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6] 2016
► pp. 756–759

Code-blending and Distributed Morphology

| Humboldt Universität zu Berlin & Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin
Published online: 17 January 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.6.6.02ale
References

References

Borer, H.
(2013) Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Belder, M., & van Craenenbroeck, J.
(2015) How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry, 46, 625–655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick. D.
(2000) Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry, 31: 185–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, D.
(2010) Localism and globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, J., & Siddiqi, D.
(2013) Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 44, 493–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, R.
2015 The morpho-syntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Müller de Quadros, R., & Chen Pichler, D.
(2016) The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(6), 719–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R.
(2009) Grammar as processor: a distributed morphology account of speech errors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar