References
Bank, R.
(2015) The ubiquity of mouthings in NGT. A corpus study. PhD thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bank R., Crasborn, O. & Hout, R. van
(2011) Variation in mouth actions with manual signs in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Sign Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 248–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, O., Kooij, E. van der, Mesch, J., Waters, D., & Woll, B.
Crasborn, O., & Zwitserlood, I.
(2008) The Corpus NGT: an online corpus for professionals and laymen. In O. Crasborn, E. Efthimiou, T. Hanke, E. Thoutenhoofd, & I. Zwitserlood (Eds.), Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora. 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages (pp. 44–49). Marrakech, Morocco: ELRA.Google Scholar
Costello, B., Fernández, J., & Landa, A.
(2008) The non-(existent) native signer: sign language research in a small deaf population. In R. Müller de Quadros (Ed.), Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty five papers and three posters from the 9th. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December 2006 (pp. 77–94). Petrópolis/RJ. Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Johnston, T., & Schembri, A.
(2006) Issues in the creation of a digital archive of a signed language. In L. Barwick, & N. Thieberger (Eds.), Sustainable data from digital fieldwork (pp. 7–16). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Müller de Quadros, R., & Chen Pichler, D.
(2016) The Development of Bimodal Bilingualism: Implications for Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(6), 719–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadolske, M. A., & Rosenstock, R.
(2007) Occurence of mouthings in American Sign Language: A preliminary study. In P. Perniss, R. Pfau, & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Visible variation (pp. 35–62). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Fenlon, J., Rentelis, R., Reynolds, S., & Cormier, K.
(2013) Building the British Sign Language Corpus. Language Documentation & Conservation, 7, 136–154.Google Scholar