Cover not available
Part of
Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 105–124

Chapter 6. Empirical stylistics in an EFL teaching context

Comparing virtual and face-to-face reading responses

| Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University
This chapter examines how Ukrainian EFL students respond to a canonical piece of poetry – in a conventional academic setting or online. Five groups (135 participants) read Dickinson’s “A slash of Blue” (1961, p. 95) and reported their response to the verse. Groups 1–3 read the poem during their classes, whereas Group 4 did it as a Facebook survey. Group 5 listened to the text on YouTube. Results reveal differences between the responses of the groups. The findings point out that readers’ responses to poetry do depend on how and where learners are exposed to the text, and this offers empirical evidence for some of the technological and contextual implications involved in literary reading.
Keywords: EFL, Facebook, poetry, reader's response, YouTube
Published online: 22 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.06che
References (62)
References
Andersen, S. (1984). Computers in the humanities: Providing faculty with new tools. In R.W. Lutz, E. Jacobson, & B. Rader (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) SIGUCCS (Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services) Conference on User Services (pp.143–148). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Baron, J., & Maier, H. (2005). The challenge of maintaining the momentum. Paper presented at the Conference of ASCILITE (the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education), Brisbane. December 2005. Accessed 12 October 2013 from: <[URL]>
Bellard-Thomson, C. (2010). How students learn stylistics: Constructing an empirical study. Language and Literature, 19(1), 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Joining the stylistic discourse community: Corpus evidence for the learning processes involved in acquiring skills for stylistic analysis. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching stylistics (pp. 51–68). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bennet, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McRae, J. (Eds). (2014). Language, literature and the learner: Creative classroom practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chesnokova, A., & Yakuba, V. (2011). Using stylistics to teach literature to non-native speakers. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching stylistics (pp. 95–108). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Davis, T. (2002). Clay ~ paper ~ light: Reading and the medium. In Book of abstracts of the 22nd PALA conference, 27 . Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
De Smedt, K. (1999). Introduction. In K. De Smedt, H. Gardiner, E. Ore, T. Orlandi, H. Short, J. Souillotm & W. Vaughan (eds), Computing in humanities education: A European perspective (pp. 1–12). Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. (1961). The complete poems. T.H. Johnson (Ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
E-ducation. A long-overdue technological revolution is at last under way. (2013). The Economist. Accessed 29 June 2013 from: <[URL]>
E-environment. Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University. <[URL]>
Fialho, O., Miall, D.S. & Zyngier, S. (2012). Experiencing or interpreting literature: Wording instructions. In M. Burke, S. Csábi, L. Week & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Pedagogical stylistics: Current trends in language, literature and ELT (pp. 58–74). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S. (2014). Quantitative methodological approaches to stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 329–345). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fogal, G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature, 24(1), 54–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W. (2013). Empirical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Companion to stylistics (pp. 189–207). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1964). The linguistic study of literary texts. In H. Lunt (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics (pp. 302–307). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Heller, W.L. (2010). Teaching Shakespeare in the elementary school through dramatic activity, play production, and technology: A case study. In W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for humanities studies (pp. 157–186). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helsper, E.J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3): 503–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igbokwe, J.C., Obidike, N.A. & Ezeji E.C. (2012). Influence of electronic media on reading ability of school children. Library Philosophy and Practice 5. Accessed 29 March 2014 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30, 390–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., Johnson-Yale, C., Millermaier, S. & Seoane Pérez, F. (2009). Everyday life, online: U.S. college students’ use of the Internet. First Monday 14.10. Accessed 11 June 2015 from: <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juola, P. (2010). Authorship attribution and the digital humanities curriculum. In W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies (pp. 1–21). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keogh, D. (2012). Exploring how differences between conventional textual formats and digital environments change the way we read / receive the poetic text. In Book of abstracts of the 32nd PALA conference, 39. Malta: University of Malta.
Kim, H. & Kim, J. (2013). Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers’ reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 15–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behaviour in the digital environment: Changes in reading behaviour over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflection on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper vs. computer screens: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computer & Education, 56(2), 429–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S.J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M.J., & Kegler, J.L. (2013). E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S. (2010). Afterword. In W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies (pp. 187–198). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minzesheimer, B. (2013). E-books are changing reading habits. USA Today. October 7. Accessed 29 March 2014 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
Oku, S. (2012). A stylistic approach to digital texts: Teaching literary texts through new media. In Book of abstracts of the 32nd PALA conference , 64. Malta: University of Malta.
Opas-Hänninen, L.L. (2010). Multivariate analysis of stance in fiction: A case study. W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies (pp. 22–52). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y. & Thunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(4), 565–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. (2012). Digital media and learner identity. The new curatorship. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S. (1980). Foundation for the empirical study of literature. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Rose, E. (2011). The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students’ lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 515–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharshenova, R.М. (2007). Modern information and communication technologies in the process of education. In Book of abstracts of Moscow scientific and practical conference “Main Directions in Constructing Models for Intercultural Competences for the CIS Languages” , 51. Moscow: MSLU.
Singh, G. (2013). Information sources, services and systems. Delhi: Phi Learning.Google Scholar
Short, M. (1989). Reading, analysing and teaching literature. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. (1996). Stylistics ‘upside down’: Using stylistic analysis in the teaching of language and literature. In R. Carter & J. McRae (Eds.), Language, literature and the learner: Creative classroom practice (pp. 41–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Short, M., Busse, B., & Plummer, P. (2007). Investigating student reactions to a web-based stylistics course in different national and educational settings. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice (pp. 106–125). Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sousa, A., & Costa, D. (2001). Broadening horizons in stylistics: The multimedia lab as a challenging tool for text analysis in EFL contexts. CAUCE, Revista de Filología y su Didáctica, 24, 175-183.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2007). On teaching literature itself. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice (pp. 15–24). Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (ed.). (2011). Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., & Fuchs, C. (2007). The power of prestige: A case for symbolic capital? In S. Zyngier, V. Viana, & J. Jandre (eds), Afetos & efeitos: Estudos empíricos de língua e de literatura (pp. 205–220). Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ Publit Soluçoes Editoriais.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., & Nousi, A. (2007). What reading does to readers: Stereotypes, foregrounding and language learning. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice (pp. 181–193). Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., Zyngier, S., & Chesnokova, A. (2011). Learning without teaching: Literature and the REDES project. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching stylistics (pp. 109–123). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Zyngier, S., & Viana, V.P. (Eds). (2010). Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wästlund, E. (2007). Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory and mental workload in complex cognition. PhD dissertation. Gothenburg University. Accessed 12 June 2015 from: <[URL] &gt;Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1975). Stylistics and the teaching of literature. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Ullman-Shade, C., & Gottwald, S. (2012). The emerging, evolving reading brain in a digital culture: Implications for new readers, children with reading difficulties, and children without schools. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(3), 230–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S. (1994). At the crossroads of language and literature: Literary awareness, stylistics, and the teaching of EFLit. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
. (2001). Towards a cultural approach to stylistics. Cause, 24, 365–380, Accessed 21 March 2014 from: <[URL]>Google Scholar
. (2008). Macbeth through the computer: Literary evaluation and pedagogical implications. In W. van Peer (Ed.), The quality of literature. Linguistic studies in literary evaluation (pp. 169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S., & Fialho, O. (2010). Pedagogical stylistics, literary awareness and empowerment: A critical perspective. Language and Literature, 19(1), 13–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Paliichuk, Elina
2022. Cognitive “warning signs” in human trafficking media texts. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :38(3) ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Paliichuk, Elina
2023. A spiderweb of human trafficking: An empirical linguistic study. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :43(4) ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Paliichuk, Elina
2023. HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND WAR IN UKRAINE: RESILIENCE IN EXPLORING STUDENT RESPONSE. The Modern Higher Education Review :8 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.