Article published in:
Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 105124
References

References

Andersen, S.
(1984) Computers in the humanities: Providing faculty with new tools. In R.W. Lutz, E. Jacobson, & B. Rader (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) SIGUCCS (Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services) Conference on User Services (pp.143–148). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Baron, J., & Maier, H.
(2005) The challenge of maintaining the momentum. Paper presented at the Conference of ASCILITE (the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education), Brisbane. December 2005. Accessed 12 October 2013 from: http://​www​.ascilite​.org​.au​/conferences​/brisbane05​/blogs​/proceedings​/07​_Baron​.pdf
Bellard-Thomson, C.
(2010) How students learn stylistics: Constructing an empirical study. Language and Literature, 19(1), 35–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Joining the stylistic discourse community: Corpus evidence for the learning processes involved in acquiring skills for stylistic analysis. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching stylistics (pp. 51–68). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bennet, S., & Maton, K.
(2010) Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L.
(2008) The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carr, N.
(2010) The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McRae, J.
(Eds) (2014) Language, literature and the learner: Creative classroom practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chesnokova, A., & Yakuba, V.
(2011) Using stylistics to teach literature to non-native speakers. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching stylistics (pp. 95–108). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Davis, T.
(2002) Clay ~ paper ~ light: Reading and the medium. In Book of abstracts of the 22nd PALA conference, 27 . Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
De Smedt, K.
(1999) Introduction. In K. De Smedt, H. Gardiner, E. Ore, T. Orlandi, H. Short, J. Souillotm & W. Vaughan (eds), Computing in humanities education: A European perspective (pp. 1–12). Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E.
(1961) The complete poems. T.H. Johnson (Ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
E-ducation. A long-overdue technological revolution is at last under way
E-environment
Fialho, O., Miall, D.S. & Zyngier, S.
(2012) Experiencing or interpreting literature: Wording instructions. In M. Burke, S. Csábi, L. Week & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Pedagogical stylistics: Current trends in language, literature and ELT (pp. 58–74). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S.
(2014) Quantitative methodological approaches to stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 329–345). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fogal, G.
(2015) Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature, 24(1), 54–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W.
(2013) Empirical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Companion to stylistics (pp. 189–207). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1964) The linguistic study of literary texts. In H. Lunt (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics (pp. 302–307). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Heller, W.L.
(2010) Teaching Shakespeare in the elementary school through dramatic activity, play production, and technology: A case study. In W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for humanities studies (pp. 157–186). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helsper, E.J., & Eynon, R.
(2010) Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3): 503–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Igbokwe, J.C., Obidike, N.A. & Ezeji E.C.
(2012) Influence of electronic media on reading ability of school children. Library Philosophy and Practice 5. Accessed 29 March 2014 from: http://​digitalcommons​.unl​.edu​/cgi​/viewcontent​.cgi​?article​=1818​&context​=libphilpracGoogle Scholar
Jeong, H.
(2012) A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30, 390–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S., Johnson-Yale, C., Millermaier, S. & Seoane Pérez, F.
(2009) Everyday life, online: U.S. college students’ use of the Internet. First Monday 14.10. Accessed 11 June 2015 from: http://​firstmonday​.org​/ojs​/index​.php​/fm​/article​/view​/2649​/2301 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G.
(2010) Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juola, P.
(2010) Authorship attribution and the digital humanities curriculum. In W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies (pp. 1–21). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keogh, D.
(2012) Exploring how differences between conventional textual formats and digital environments change the way we read / receive the poetic text. In Book of abstracts of the 32nd PALA conference, 39. Malta: University of Malta.
Kim, H. & Kim, J.
(2013) Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers’ reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 15–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z.
(2005) Reading behaviour in the digital environment: Changes in reading behaviour over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S.
(2012) Critical reflection on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D.
(2014) Lost in an iPad. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., & Brønnick, K.
(2013) Reading linear texts on paper vs. computer screens: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G.
(2011) Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computer & Education, 56(2), 429–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, S.J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M.J., & Kegler, J.L.
(2013) E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S.
(2010) Afterword. In W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies (pp. 187–198). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minzesheimer, B.
(2013) E-books are changing reading habits. USA Today. October 7. Accessed 29 March 2014 from: http://​www​.usatoday​.com​/story​/life​/books​/2013​/10​/06​/e​-books​-reading​/2877471/Google Scholar
Oku, S.
(2012) A stylistic approach to digital texts: Teaching literary texts through new media. In Book of abstracts of the 32nd PALA conference , 64. Malta: University of Malta.
Opas-Hänninen, L.L.
(2010) Multivariate analysis of stance in fiction: A case study. W. van Peer, S. Zyngier, & V.P. Viana (Eds.), Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies (pp. 22–52). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piolat, A., Roussey, J.-Y. & Thunin, O.
(1997) Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(4), 565–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J.
(2012) Digital media and learner identity. The new curatorship. Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prensky, M.
(2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S.
(1980) Foundation for the empirical study of literature. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Rose, E.
(2011) The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students’ lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 515–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharshenova, R.М.
(2007) Modern information and communication technologies in the process of education. In Book of abstracts of Moscow scientific and practical conference “Main Directions in Constructing Models for Intercultural Competences for the CIS Languages” , 51. Moscow: MSLU.
Singh, G.
(2013) Information sources, services and systems. Delhi: Phi Learning.Google Scholar
Short, M.
(1989) Reading, analysing and teaching literature. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(1996) Stylistics ‘upside down’: Using stylistic analysis in the teaching of language and literature. In R. Carter & J. McRae (Eds.), Language, literature and the learner: Creative classroom practice (pp. 41–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Short, M., Busse, B., & Plummer, P.
(2007) Investigating student reactions to a web-based stylistics course in different national and educational settings. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice (pp. 106–125). Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, A., & Costa, D.
(2001) Broadening horizons in stylistics: The multimedia lab as a challenging tool for text analysis in EFL contexts. CAUCE, Revista de Filología y su Didáctica, 24, 175-183.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
(2007) On teaching literature itself. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice (pp. 15–24). Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M.
(ed.) (2011) Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration. Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., & Fuchs, C.
(2007) The power of prestige: A case for symbolic capital? In S. Zyngier, V. Viana, & J. Jandre (eds), Afetos & efeitos: Estudos empíricos de língua e de literatura (pp. 205–220). Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ Publit Soluçoes Editoriais.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., & Nousi, A.
(2007) What reading does to readers: Stereotypes, foregrounding and language learning. In G. Watson & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice (pp. 181–193). Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W., Zyngier, S., & Chesnokova, A.
(2011) Learning without teaching: Literature and the REDES project. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching stylistics (pp. 109–123). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Zyngier, S., & Viana, V.P.
(Eds) (2010) Literary education and digital learning: Methods and technologies for Humanities studies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wästlund, E.
(2007) Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory and mental workload in complex cognition. PhD dissertation. Gothenburg University. Accessed 12 June 2015 from: https://​gupea​.ub​.gu​.se​/bitstream​/2077​/4693​/1​/gupea​_2077​_4693​_1​.pdf >Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.
(1975) Stylistics and the teaching of literature. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Ullman-Shade, C., & Gottwald, S.
(2012) The emerging, evolving reading brain in a digital culture: Implications for new readers, children with reading difficulties, and children without schools. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(3), 230–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S.
(1994) At the crossroads of language and literature: Literary awareness, stylistics, and the teaching of EFLit. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
(2001) Towards a cultural approach to stylistics. Cause, 24, 365–380, Accessed 21 March 2014 from: http://​cvc​.cervantes​.es​/literatura​/cauce​/pdf​/cauce24​/cauce24​_21​.pdfGoogle Scholar
(2008) Macbeth through the computer: Literary evaluation and pedagogical implications. In W. van Peer (Ed.), The quality of literature. Linguistic studies in literary evaluation (pp. 169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S., & Fialho, O.
(2010) Pedagogical stylistics, literary awareness and empowerment: A critical perspective. Language and Literature, 19(1), 13–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar