Article published in:
Linguistics and Literary History: In honour of Sylvia Adamson
Edited by Anita Auer, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson and Violeta Sotirova
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 25] 2016
► pp. 111–128

Chapter 6. The first person in fiction of the 1790s

This article will examine the complexities of first-person narrative in late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century fiction. Taking as its starting-point Sylvia Adamson’s ground-breaking work on shifts of point of view in Puritan narratives (see Adamson 1995), it shows that the Romantic period novel is also concerned with exploring the potential complications of first-person perspective, frequently with a view to exposing political changes or contradictions. The authors focused on will be Mary Hays and Elizabeth Hamilton. The first-person perspective in this period has often been identified as an unequivocal outlet for Jacobin sympathies; this essay will use detailed stylistic analysis to suggest that the picture may be more complicated. Building on recent work on first-person narrative from a narratological standpoint (see for example Phelan (2005)), I will show that an examination of texts from the 1790s and beyond calls into question the traditional distinction between the ‘narrating’ and ‘experiencing’ selves of first-person narrative. The novels and memoirs under discussion demonstrate instead the ability of the first person to contain within it a complex, ever-shifting range of deictic and ideological positions.
Published online: 20 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.25.07bra
References

References

Adamson, S.
1994a Subjectivity in narration: Empathy and echo. In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, M. Yaguello (ed.), 183–198. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
1994b From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylisation and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92 (1): 55–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Empathetic narrative: A literary and linguistic problem. In Syntax and the Literary Text, W. Ayres-Bennett & P. O’Donovan (eds), 17–42. Cambridge: Cambridge French Colloquia.Google Scholar
2001 The rise and fall of empathetic narrative. In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, W. van Peer & S. Chatman (eds), 83–99. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Altman, J.
1982 Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bowstead, D.
1986 Charlotte Smith’s Desmond: The epistolary novel as ideological argument. In Fetter’d or Free? British Women Novelists 1670–1815, M.A. Schofield & C. Macheski (eds), 237–263. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, D.
1978 Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M.
1996 Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
1980 Narrative Discourse, translated by J.E. Lewin. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Godwin, W.
1992[1793] An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, and Its Influence on General Virtue and Happiness. London: Printed for G.G.J. & J. Robinson (Facsimile repr. Oxford and New York NY: Woodstock].Google Scholar
Grenby, M.O.
2011 Novels of opinion. In The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s, P. Clemit (ed.), 160–174. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, C.L.
1999 Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hays, M.
1793 Letters and Essays, Moral, and Miscellaneous. London: T. Knott.Google Scholar
2000 [1796] Memoirs of Emma Courtney, M.L. Brooks (ed.). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview.Google Scholar
Hume, D.
1978[1739–1740] A Treatise of Human Nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), 2nd edn: P.H. Nidditch (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keen, S.
2006 A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative 14(3): 207–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G.
1989 English Fiction of the Romantic Period, 1789–1830. London: Longman.Google Scholar
King, N.
2000 Memory, Narrative, Identity: Remembering the Self. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
MacArthur, E.J.
1990 Extravagant Narratives: Closure and Dynamics in the Epistolary Form. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
1994 A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics 23: 53–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A.
2004 Fictional Minds. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, J.
2005 Living to Tell about It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A.
1976[1759, 1790] The Theory of Moral Sentiments, D.D. Raphael & A.L. Macfie (eds). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C.
2001[1792] Desmond, A. Blank & J. Todd (eds). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Stanzel, F.K.
1984[1979] A Theory of Narrative, C. Goedsche (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C.
1999 Intersubjectivity. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds), 413–416. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watson, N.
1994 Revolution and the Form of the British Novel, 1790–1825: Intercepted Letters, Interrupted Seductions. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.A.
1999 Philosophy: Introduction. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds), ix–xvii. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.