Cover not available
Part of
Linguistics and Literary History: In honour of Sylvia Adamson
Edited by Anita Auer, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson and Violeta Sotirova
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 25] 2016
► pp. 111–128

Chapter 6. The first person in fiction of the 1790s

This article will examine the complexities of first-person narrative in late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century fiction. Taking as its starting-point Sylvia Adamson’s ground-breaking work on shifts of point of view in Puritan narratives (see Adamson 1995), it shows that the Romantic period novel is also concerned with exploring the potential complications of first-person perspective, frequently with a view to exposing political changes or contradictions. The authors focused on will be Mary Hays and Elizabeth Hamilton. The first-person perspective in this period has often been identified as an unequivocal outlet for Jacobin sympathies; this essay will use detailed stylistic analysis to suggest that the picture may be more complicated. Building on recent work on first-person narrative from a narratological standpoint (see for example Phelan (2005)), I will show that an examination of texts from the 1790s and beyond calls into question the traditional distinction between the ‘narrating’ and ‘experiencing’ selves of first-person narrative. The novels and memoirs under discussion demonstrate instead the ability of the first person to contain within it a complex, ever-shifting range of deictic and ideological positions.
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.25.07bra
References (29)
References
Adamson, S. 1994a. Subjectivity in narration: Empathy and echo. In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, M. Yaguello (ed.), 183–198. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 1994b. From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylisation and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92 (1): 55–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Empathetic narrative: A literary and linguistic problem. In Syntax and the Literary Text, W. Ayres-Bennett & P. O’Donovan (eds), 17–42. Cambridge: Cambridge French Colloquia.Google Scholar
. 2001. The rise and fall of empathetic narrative. In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, W. van Peer & S. Chatman (eds), 83–99. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Altman, J. 1982. Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bowstead, D. 1986. Charlotte Smith’s Desmond: The epistolary novel as ideological argument. In Fetter’d or Free? British Women Novelists 1670–1815, M.A. Schofield & C. Macheski (eds), 237–263. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, D. 1978. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse, translated by J.E. Lewin. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Godwin, W. 1992[1793]. An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, and Its Influence on General Virtue and Happiness. London: Printed for G.G.J. & J. Robinson (Facsimile repr. Oxford and New York NY: Woodstock].Google Scholar
Grenby, M.O. 2011. Novels of opinion. In The Cambridge Companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s, P. Clemit (ed.), 160–174. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griswold, C.L. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hays, M. 1793. Letters and Essays, Moral, and Miscellaneous. London: T. Knott.Google Scholar
. 2000 [1796]. Memoirs of Emma Courtney, M.L. Brooks (ed.). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1978[1739–1740]. A Treatise of Human Nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), 2nd edn: P.H. Nidditch (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keen, S. 2006. A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative 14(3): 207–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. 1989. English Fiction of the Romantic Period, 1789–1830. London: Longman.Google Scholar
King, N. 2000. Memory, Narrative, Identity: Remembering the Self. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
MacArthur, E.J. 1990. Extravagant Narratives: Closure and Dynamics in the Epistolary Form. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. 1994. A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics 23: 53–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. 2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, J. 2005. Living to Tell about It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976[1759, 1790]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, D.D. Raphael & A.L. Macfie (eds). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 2001[1792]. Desmond, A. Blank & J. Todd (eds). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Stanzel, F.K. 1984[1979]. A Theory of Narrative, C. Goedsche (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. 1999. Intersubjectivity. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds), 413–416. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watson, N. 1994. Revolution and the Form of the British Novel, 1790–1825: Intercepted Letters, Interrupted Seductions. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.A. 1999. Philosophy: Introduction. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds), ix–xvii. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.