Cover not available
Part of
Linguistics and Literary History: In honour of Sylvia Adamson
Edited by Anita Auer, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson and Violeta Sotirova
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 25] 2016
► pp. 129–150

Chapter 7. “Worth a moment’s notice”

Jane Austen and conversational parentheticals

This paper explores the competition between round brackets and other punctuation marks as delimiters of kinesic parentheticals in Austen’s dialogue (e.g. said Harriet, in a mortified voice). Drawing mainly on an analysis of Emma, the investigation suggests that, linguistically, round brackets in Austen are preferred over other punctuation marks in cases where the kinesic parenthetical is not introduced by a reporting clause and takes the form of an -ing clause (e.g. laughing affectedly). Stylistically, the data show that kinesic parentheticals are amenable to an interpretation along Mahlberg’s (2007) distinction between ‘contextualising’ and ‘highlighting’ textual functions; the ‘highlighting’ functions being more prominent when the kinesic information is introduced by round brackets. More generally, the paper provides an example of how punctuation can contribute to textual structuring. Jane Austen is known to have disliked parenthetical attributions of speech (Toner 2012). In this connection, the paper tentatively suggests that the use of rounds brackets as kinesic parenthetical markers in her work may partly be the result of Austen’s stylistic experimentation with ways of avoiding attribution of speech markers and helping the reader to identify secondary (female) characters.
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.25.08gon
References (62)
References
Adamson, S. 1999. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English language, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, S. Romaine (ed.), 589–685. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babb, H. 1962. Jane Austen’s Novels. The Fabric of Dialogue. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Barchas, J. 2007. Very Austen: Accounting for the language of Emma . Nineteenth-Century Literature 62: 303–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D. 2005. And-parentheticals. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8): 1165–1181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The division of labour between syntax and pragmatics: parentheticals. Lingua 116(10): 1670–1687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Parentheticals and point of view in free indirect style. Language and Literature 18(2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bray, J. 2003. The Epistolary Novel: Representation of Consciousness. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brightland, J. 1712. A Grammar of the English Tongue, with Notes, Giving the Grounds and Reason of Grammar in General. London: R. Brugis.Google Scholar
Burrows, J. 1987. Computation into Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. 1923. The Novels of Jane Austen. Oxford: Clarendon (appendix to vol. IV “Punctuation”, 516–518).Google Scholar
DeForest, M. & Johnson, E. 2001. The density of Latinate words in the speeches of Jane Austen’s characters. Literary and Linguistic Computing 16: 389–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drabble, M. (ed.). 1974. Lady Susan – The Watsons – Sandition. Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fergus, J. 2002. The power of women’s language and laughter. In The Talk in Jane Austen, B. Stovel & L. Weinlos-Gregg (eds), 103–121. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Starcke, B. 2009. Keywords and frequent phrases of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. A corpus stylistic approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(4): 492–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Corpus Linguistics in Literary Analysis: Jane Austen and her Contemporaries. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. 1753. A New Grammar, with Exercises of Bad English: Or, an Easy Guide to Speaking and Writing the English Language Properly and Correctly, 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. 1766. Sermons to Young Women. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Frischen, Jutta. 1996. Word length analysis of Jane Austen’s letters. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 3: 80–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fritzer, P.J. 1997. Jane Austen and Eighteenth-century Courtesy Books. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
González-Díaz, V. 2012. Round brackets in Jane Austen. English Text Construction 5(2): 455–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodheart, E. 2008. Emma: Jane Austen’s errant heroine. The Sewanee Review 16(4): 589–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J. 1711. An Essay Towards a Practical English Grammar. Describing the Genius and Nature of the English Tongue. London.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. 1761. A Father’s Legacy to his Daughters. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Hong, M. 2005. ‘A great talker upon little matters’: Trivializing the everyday in Emma . Novel: A Forum on Fiction 38: 235–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R.E. 1961. The education of Emma Woodhouse. Nineteenth-century Fiction 16(1): 69–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. 2008. Emma, gender and the mind-brain. ELH 75(2): 315–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lascelles, M. 1939. Jane Austen and her Art. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lennard, J. 1991. But I digress. The Exploitation of Parentheses in English Print Verse. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Litz, A.W. 1965. Jane Austen. A Study of her Artistic Development. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. 2007. Clusters, key clusters and local textual functions in Dickens. Corpora 2(1):1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. & Smith, C. 2010. Corpus approaches to prose fiction: Civility and body language in Pride and Prejudice. In Language and Style, D. McIntyre & B. Busse (eds), 449–467. Houndmills: Palgrave.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Dickens, the suspended quotation and the corpus. Language and Literature 21(1): 51–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandal, A. 2007[2005]. Language. In Jane Austen in Context, J. Todd (ed.), 23–32. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McMaster, J. 2002. Mrs Elton and other verbal aggressors. In The Talk in Jane Austen, B. Stovel & L. Weinlos-Gregg (eds.), 73–89. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Michaelson, P.H. 2002. Speaking Volumes. Women, Reading and Speech in the Age of Austen. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. 1975. Emma Woodhouse and the charms of imagination. Studies in the Novel 7(1): 33–48.Google Scholar
Morini, M. 2009. Jane Austen’s Narrative Techniques. A Stylistic and Pragmatic Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Murray, L. 1795. English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. York.Google Scholar
Mylne, V. 1979. The punctuation of dialogue in eighteenth-century French and English fiction. The Library: Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 6(1): 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, N. 1972. The Language of Jane Austen. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parkes, M.B. 1992. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Aldershot: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Phillipps, K.C. 1970. Jane Austen’s English. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Raven, J. 2007 [2005]. Book production. In Jane Austen in Context, J. Todd (ed.), 194–203. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. 1994. ‘Caro sposo’: Mrs Elton, Burneys, Thrales and Noels. The Review of English Studies . New Series 45: 70–75.Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2008. WordSmith Tools, Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Smith, L.W. 2002. ‘Hands off my man!’ or ‘Don’t you wish you had one?.’ In The Talk in Jane Austen, B. Stovel & L. Weinlos-Gregg (eds), 91–103. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Southam, B. 2001[1963]. Jane Austen’s Literary Manuscripts. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Stabler, J. 2007[2005]. Literary influences. In Jane Austen in Context, J. Todd (ed.), 41–50. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stafford, F. 1996. Emma. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 2007. Jane Austen: A Casebook. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. 1987. ‘Smart’ talk by Miss Austen. In Medieval Literature and Antiquities. Studies in Honour of Basil Cottle, M. Stokes & T.L. Burton (eds), 187–197. London: Brewer.Google Scholar
Stovel, B. & Weinlos-Gregg, L. (eds). 2002. The Talk in Jane Austen Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Sturrock, J. 2007. ‘I am rather a talker’: Speech and silence. Persuasions. The Jane Austen Journal On-line 28(1). <[URL]>Google Scholar
Sutherland, K. (ed.). 1997. Mansfield Park. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
. 2005. Jane Austen’s Textual Lives: From Aeschylus to Bollywood. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2007[2005]. Chronology of composition and publication. In Jane Austen in Context, J. Todd (ed.), 12–22. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tave, S. 1973. Some Words of Jane Austen. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.V. 1978. The grammar of conduct: Speech act theory and the education of Emma Woodhouse. Style 13(4): 357–371.Google Scholar
Todd, J. 1986. Sensibility. An Introduction. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Toner, A. 2012. A ‘said he’ or a ‘said she’: Speech attribution in Austen’s fiction. Persuasions 34: 140–149.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, A.E. 1975. Three word clusters in Emma. Studies in the Novel (Jane Austen Special Issue) 7: 61–72.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.