Part of
The Stylistics of Landscapes, the Landscapes of Stylistics
Edited by John Douthwaite, Daniela Francesca Virdis and Elisabetta Zurru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 28] 2017
► pp. 4560
References (43)
References
Bell, A. & Alber, J. 2012. Ontological metalepsis and unnatural narratology. Journal of Narrative Theory 42(2): 166–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. 2012. Experiment and nation in the 1960s. In The Edinburgh Companion to Scottish Women’s Writing, G. Norquay (ed.), 122–129. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. 1990 [1934]. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, D. F. Goodwin (trans). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohn, D. 2012. Metalepsis and mise en abyme, L. S. Gleich (trans). Narrative 20(1): 105–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davie, E. 1984 [1968]. A map of the world. In The Spark and Other Stories, 126–142. London & New York: John Calder & Riverrun Press. Also reprinted in D. Dunn (ed.). 1995. The Oxford Book of Scottish Short Stories, 313–326. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
De Vega, M., Glenberg, A. M. & Graesser, A. C. (eds). 2008. Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A. & Hewitt, L. E. (eds). 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. 1995. Introduction. In The Oxford Book of Scottish Short Stories, D. Dunn (ed.), ix–xxix. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. 1994. Frames of reference: Contextual monitoring and narrative discourse. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, M. Coulthard (ed.), 157–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1997. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. & Alexander, M. 2010. Detective fiction, plot construction, and reader manipulation: Rhetorical control and cognitive misdirection in Agatha Christie’s Sparkling Cyanide . In Language and Style: In Honour of Mick Short, D. McIntyre & B. Busse (eds), 328–346. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feyersinger, E. 2012. The conceptual integration network of metalepsis. In Blending and the Study of Narrative: Approaches and Applications, R. Schneider & M. Hartner (eds), 173–198. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M. 2003. Scene shift, metalepsis, and the metaleptic mode. Style 3: 382–400.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1988. Narrative Discourse Revisited. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. 1993. Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gifford, D. 2002. Scottish fiction since 1945 II: Despair, change and hope. In Scottish Literature in English and Scots, D. Gifford, S. Dunnigan, & A. MacGillivray (eds), 899–980. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 558–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. 1994. Lanark: A Life in 4 Books. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Herman, D. 1997. Toward a formal description of narrative metalepsis. Journal of Literary Semantics 26: 132–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. 1985. Granularity. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, K. J. Aravind (ed.), 432–435. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. 2006. Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain. Neuropsychologia 44: 752–761. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, K. & Klimek, S. (eds). 2011. Metalepsis in Popular Culture. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičova, A. 2013. Mental Imagery in the Experience of Literary Narrative: Views from Embodied Cognition. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Lively, P. 2004. The Photograph. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Malina, D. 2002. Breaking the Frame: Metalepsis and the Construction of the Subject. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
McHale, B. 1987. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelles, W. 1997. Frameworks: Narrative Levels and Embedded Narrative. New York NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pier, J. 2005. Metalepsis. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, D. Herman, M. Jahn & M. -L. Ryan (eds), 303–304. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014. Metalepsis. In Handbook of Narratology, 2nd edn, P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier & W. Schmid (eds), 326–343. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pier, J. & Schaeffer, J. -M. (eds). 2005. Métalepses: Entorses au Pacte de la Répresentation. Paris: Éd. de l’EHESS.Google Scholar
Poggi, V. 1997. Vision and space in Elspeth Davie’s fiction. In A History of Scottish Women’s Writing, D. Gifford & D. McMillan (eds), 526–536. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Prince, G. 2006. Disturbing frames. Poetics Today 27: 625–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. J. & Emmott, C. 2012. Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Spunta, M. 1995. A universe of one’s own? Elspeth Davie and the narrative of “The gap”. Chapman 81: 19–26.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (eds), 225–282. New York NY: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics , Vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Yao, B., Belin, P. & Scheepers, C. 2011. Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(10): 3146–3152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. 2004. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, B. H. Ross (ed.), 35–62. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar