Cover not available
Part of
The Stylistics of Landscapes, the Landscapes of Stylistics
Edited by John Douthwaite, Daniela Francesca Virdis and Elisabetta Zurru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 28] 2017
► pp. 153–190

Chapter 9
A social landscape

Form and style in an Edith Wharton short story

The beginning of Edith Wharton’s short story “The day of the funeral” rightly lays claim to being one of the most powerful openings in the genre. The first two paragraphs (139 words) foreshadow the content and tone of the entire story, a critique of patriarchal society. They also exemplify the richly implicational mode of writing employed by Wharton, displaying the myriad of foregrounding devices the author uses to achieve her goals, one major objective being that of positioning the reader to evaluate negatively the main (male) character, the ‘representative’ of the callous male world portrayed by the story. A close reading of the first two paragraphs is offered to illustrate these points.
Article outline
  • 1.Background to Edith Wharton and “The day of the funeral”
  • 2.Objectives and method
  • 3.The opening two paragraphs
    • 3a.The first paragraph
    • 3b.The second paragraph
  • 4.Confirmation
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.28.09dou
References (35)
References
Beer, J. 1999. Introduction. In “The reckoning” and Other Stories, E. Wharton, J. Beer (ed.). London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1986. Women, Men and Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Conte, M. -E. 1996. Anaphoric encapsulation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10: 1–10. Special issue Coherence and Anaphora, W. De Mulder & L. Tasmowski (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortese, G. (ed.). 1992. Her/His Speechways: Gender Perspectives in English. Torino: Cortina.Google Scholar
Dam, L. 2014. The interpretation of encapsulating anaphors in Spanish and their functions. Folia Linguistica 48(1): 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douthwaite, J. 2000. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Foregrounding. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2004. “In my beginning is my end”: A stylistic investigation into James Joyce’s “A Mother”. Letterature straniere &: Quaderni della Facoltà di Lingue e Letterature Straniere dell’Università degli Studi di Cagliari 6: 75–96.Google Scholar
2007. A stylistic view of modality. In Linguistica, linguaggi specialistici, didattica della lingua: Studi in onore di Leo Schena, G. Garzone & R. Salvi (eds), 107–156. Rome: CISU.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. & Gubar, S. 1984. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Imagination. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1991. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grudin, P. 1977. Jane and the other Mrs. Rochester: Excess and restraint in Jane Eyre . NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 10(2): 145–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L. & McIntyre, D. 2010. Stylistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1922. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kern, S. 2011. The Modernist Novel: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1973. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 2(1): 45–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, D. 2012. Breaches of realist conventions in Edith Wharton’s short fiction. Journal of the Short Story in English 58: 45–58.Google Scholar
Morantz, R. & Zschoche, S. 1980. Professionalism, feminism, and gender roles: A comparative study of nineteenth-century medical therapeutics. The Journal of American History 63(3): 568–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Barr, W. E. & Atkins, W. K. 1992. “Women’s language” or “powerless language”? In Her/His Speechways: Gender Perspectives in English, G. Cortese (ed.), 61–78. Torino: Cortina.Google Scholar
Rich, C. 2004. Fictions of colonial anxiety: Edith Wharton’s “The seed of the faith” and “A bottle of Perrier’”. Journal of the Short Story in English 43: 59–74.Google Scholar
Romagnolo, C. 2015. Opening Acts: Narrative Beginnings in Twentieth-Century Feminist Fiction. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. 1965. Art as technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, L. Lemon & M. Reis (eds). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Short, M. 1983. Stylistics and the teaching of literature. In Teaching Literature Overseas: Language-Based Approaches, C. J. Brumfit (ed.), 67–84. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1996. Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Skillern, R. 1995. Becoming a good girl. In The Cambridge Companion to Edith Wharton, M. Bell (ed.), 117–136. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uspensky, B. 1970[1973]. A Poetics of Composition. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, P. 1990. Edith Wharton and the Art of Fiction. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Wharton, E. 1920. Henry James in his letters. Quarterly Review 234.Google Scholar
1924[1977]. The Writing of Fiction. New York NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
1999. The day of the funeral. In “The reckoning” and Other Stories, E. Wharton, J. Beer (ed.), 198–218. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Wheeler, K. 1998. A Critical Guide to Twentieth-Century Women Novelists. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Adnan Mohamed, Zahraa & Eman Adil Jaafar
2023.  An ecostylistic analysis of selected extracts from Michael Punke’s novel The Revenant . Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.