Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 59–80

Chapter 4
Verbal irony, politeness… and three ironic types

| University of Perpignan, CRESEM
This paper critically examines Leech’s (2014) view that verbal or conversational irony is subsumed by politeness considerations, and proposes a new, threefold account of verbal irony. Although Leech’s pragmatic model of irony is inadequate as a whole, it highlights crucial aspects of irony relating to (im)politeness theory. I propose an alternative account of verbal irony that first recognizes two major types, polar irony and impersonation irony, which have been referred to in the literature under various denominations, including oppositional irony and echoic irony (Simpson 2011). In polar irony, a desirable state of affairs is evoked that is blatantly contradicted by facts; in impersonation irony, the speaker takes up someone else’s viewpoint or an assumed identity to ridicule targets or victims of the irony. Building on Leech’s observations, I argue that a last type should be added, mock politeness irony, noting that the three types of verbal irony can combine. In the course of the discussion I review psycholinguistic data, other conceptions of irony, and the connection between politeness, irony and banter.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Leech’s framework
    • 2.1 Mock politeness, irony and sarcasm
    • 2.2Leech’s pragmatic procedure
    • 2.3Leech’s triggers
  • 3.How to define verbal irony?
    • 3.1Different approaches
    • 3.2Contrastive irony
    • 3.3Impersonation irony
  • 4.Politeness, irony and banter
    • 4.1A third type of verbal irony
    • 4.2“Genteel irony” and banter
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.04sim
References (76)
References
Abrams, Meyer H. 1999[1957]. A Glossary of Literary Terms, 7th edn. Boston MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Anolli, Luigi, Ciceri, Rita & Infantino, Maria G. 2000. Irony as a game of impliciteness: Acoustic profiles of ironic communication. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 29: 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Campbell, John D. & Katz, Albert T. 2012. Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes 49(6): 459–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn & Wearing, Catherine. 2015. Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics 79: 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Gerrig, Richard J. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert L. 1997. Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes 23: 25–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 111–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert L. & O’Brien, Jennifer O. 2000a. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do it better. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000b. Contrast of kind vs. contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes 30: 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cori, Valerio, Canestrari, Carla & Bianchi, Ivana. 2016. The perception of contrariety and the processing of verbal irony. Gestalt Theory 38: 253–256.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72.Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 2006. Why irony is pretence. In The Architecture of the Imagination. New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction, Shaun Nichols (ed.), 111–133. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne 1974. On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Michael Lagaly, Robert Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds), 117–127. Chicago IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Kaplan, Joan & Winner, Ellen. 1995. Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes 19: 347–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly & Winner, Ellen. 1995. Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A., & Smarsh, B. 1996. Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development 67: 3071–3085. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2014. Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humour 27(4): 619–639.Google Scholar
Fein, Ofer, Yeari, Menahem & Giora, Rachel. 2015. On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of irony. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, Richard J. & Goldvarg, Yevgeniya. 2000. Additive effects in the perception of sarcasm: Situational disparity and echoic mention. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 197–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1986. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology . General 115: 3–15.Google Scholar
2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and what is implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. & O’Brien, Jennifer. 1991. Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 523–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1995. On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. When negatives are easier to understand than affirmatives: The case of negative sarcasm. In Negation and Negative Polarity: Experimental Perspectives, Pierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds), 127–143. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Drucker, Ari, Fein, Ofer & Mendelson, Itamar. 2015. Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations. Discourse Processes 52(3): 173–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Federman, Shani, Kehat, Arnon, Fein, Ofer & Sabah, Hadas. 2005. Irony aptness. Humor 18: 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 1999a. Irony: context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol 14: 241–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999b. Irony comprehension: The graded salience hypothesis. Humor 12: 425–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer, Ganzi, Jonathan, Alkeslassy Levi, Natalie & Sabah, Hadas. 2005. On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes 39: 81–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer, Laadan, Dafna, Wolfson, Joe, Zeituny, Michal, Kidron, Ran, Kaufman, Ronie & Shaham, Ronit. 2007. Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol 22: 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer & Schwartz, Tamir. 1998. Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol 13: 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Givoni, Shir & Fein, Ofer. 2015. Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol 30(4): 290–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamamoto, Hideki. 1998. Irony from a cognitive perspective. In Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 37], Robyn Carston & Seiji Uchida (eds), 257–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Jeffrey T., Dunham, Philip J. & Purdy, Kelly. 2000. Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development 1: 227–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanko, Stacey L. & Pexman, Penny M. 2003. Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes 35: 241–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaakinen, Joahanna K., Olkoniemi, Henri, Kinnari, Taina & Hyönä, Jukka. 2014. Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes 51(4): 287–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Albert N. 2005. Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, Herbert L. Colston & Albert N. Katz (eds), 183–207. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2009. On the science and art of sarcasm. In Studies on Themes and Motifs in Literature: Disguise, Deception, Trompe-l’oeil, Leslie Boldt-Irons, Corrado Federici & Ernesto Virgulti (eds), 81–96. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2002. Politesse en deçà des Pyrénées, impolitesse au delà: Retour sur la question de l’universalité de la (théorie de la) politesse. Marges linguistiques (May 2002): 1–18. <[URL]> Google Scholar
. 2005. Le discours en interaction. Paris: Armand-Colin.Google Scholar
. 2010. L’impolitesse en interaction: Aperçus théoriques et étude de cas. Lexis spécial 2: « Impoliteness / Impolitesse »: 35–60. <[URL]> Google Scholar
Kowatch, Kristi, Whalen, Juanita M. & Pexman, Penny M. 2013. Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes 50(5): 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger T. & Glucksberg, Sam. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 374–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary. 1995. How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124: 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Robert. 1992. Irony and universe of belief. Lingua 87: 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Jacqueline K., Hancock, Jeffrey T. & Dunham, Philip J. 2006. The roles of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony. Discourse Processes 41(1): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muecke, Douglas C. 1969. The Compass of Irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1982[1970]. Irony and the Ironic, 2nd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1786–1800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Laurent. 1996. L’ironie mise en trope: Du sens des énoncés hyperboliques et ironiques. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. 2008. It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current directions in Psychological Science 17: 287–290 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Ferretti, Todd R. & Katz, Albert N. 2000. Discourse factors that influence irony detection during on-line reading. Discourse Processes 29: 201–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Glenwright, Melanie, Krol, Andrea & James, Talmy. 2005. An acquired taste: Children’s perception of humour and teasing in verbal irony. Discourse Processes 40: 259–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. & Olineck, Kara M. 2002. Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes 33(3): 199–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Whalen, Juanita M. & Green, Jill J. 2010. Understanding verbal irony: Clues from interpretation of direct and indirect ironic remarks. Discourse Processes 47(3): 237–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. & Zvaigzne, Meghan. 2004. Does irony go better with friends? Metaphor and Symbol 19: 143–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwoebel, John, Dews, Shelly, Winner, Ellen & Srinivas, Kavitha. 2000. Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 47–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonin, Olivier. 2006. Ironie: Voie étrange et voix étrangères. Bulletin de la Société de Stylistique Anglaise 27: 27–44.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2011. “That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid”: Towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210], Marta Dynel (ed.), 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Americans don’t do irony: Cross-cultural perspectives on the pragmatics of irony. Paper presented at the conference The Discursive Practice of Irony and Banter, Université Lyon 3, 12-13 November.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1978. Les ironies comme mentions. Poétique 36: 399–412.Google Scholar
Toplak, Maggie & Katz, Albert N. 2000. On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467–1488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, Akira. 2000. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: distinguishing ironic utterances from non irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veale, Tony. 2013. Humorous similes. Humour 26(1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet. 1869 [1759]. Candide ou l’optimisme. Paris: Académie des Bibliophiles.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony. Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 59: 40–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 2012. Explaining irony. In Meaning and Relevance, 123–145. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.