Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 120
References
Attardo, Salvatore
2000Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbe, Katharina
1993Isn’t it ironic that…? Explicit irony markers. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 578–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Irony in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M.
2012The Language of Fictional Television. Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Black, Elizabeth
2006Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne
1974A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Gerrig, Richard
1984On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Haugh, Michael
2014Pragmatics and the English Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Kaplan, Joan & Winner, Ellen
2007Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 297–317. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2009Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5): 1284–1299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011“You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1628–1644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 27(4): 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna
2007Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna & Lahey, Ernestine
2016World building in discourse. In World Building. Discourse in the Mind, Joanna Gavins & Ernestine Lahey (eds), 1–13. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W.
1994The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W
2002A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., O’Brien, Jennifer & Doolittle, Shelley
1995Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes 20: 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel
1995On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Discourse coherence and the theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately? In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 19–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer
1999On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer, Laadan, Dafna, Wolfson, Jon, Zeituny, Michal, Kidrons, Ran, Kaufman, Ronnie & Shaham, Ronit
2007Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol 22(2): 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1991Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2000Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2(2): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House of Cards
. 2013-2015 Seasons 1-3. Network: Netflix. Writers: Beau Willimon, Michael Dobbs, Andrew Davies (among others). Directors: Robin Wright, David Fincher, James Foley, Joel Schumacher, Charles McDougall.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda
1994Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kim “Howard”
1999The First 280 Years of the Monty Python. New York NY: Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary
2007How about another piece of pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 57–95. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1977Language and Tact [Series A, Paper No. 46]. Trier: Linguistic Agency University of Trier. (Reprinted with revisions in Leech, Geoffrey. 1980. Exploration in Semantics and Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond I:5], 79-117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lugea, Jane
2013Embedded dialogue and dreams: The worlds and accessibility relations of Inception . Language and Literature 22(2): 133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marszalek, Agnes
2016The humorous worlds of film comedy. In World Building. Discourse in the Mind, Joanna Gavins & Ernestine Lahey (eds), 203–219. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Morini, Massimiliano
2016Irony in Dickens’ Nicholas Nickleby: Rhetoric, pragmatics, voice and point of view. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.), 553–566. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Muecke, Douglas Colin
1969The Compass of Irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
1993Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne
2006Investigating Media Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan
2007Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peleg, Orna, Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer
2008Resisting contextual information: You can’t put a salient meaning down. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4: 13–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham
1982Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Analyzing Discourse. Text and Talk, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Shelley, Cameron
2001The bicoherence theory of situational irony. Cognitive Science 25: 775–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul
2003On the Discourse of Satire [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011“That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid.” Towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre, Wilson
1981Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter
2002Cognitive Poetics, An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Utsumi, Akira
2000Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
1992On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2006The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, Paul
1999Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.