Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 195–214

Chapter 10
The Rolling Stones promoting Monty Python

The power of irony and banter

| Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA/IUF, Aix-en-Provence, France
Based on Text World Theory, this chapter offers a fine-grained analysis of how irony and banter are likely to be processed by viewers watching a promotional video but also highlights the pragmatic functions of such an indirect strategy. It dissects a 1:40 tongue-in-cheek video which served as an introduction to the 2014 Monty Python Live (Mostly) press conference. It features Mick Jagger accusing the coming troupe of being “wrinkly old men trying to relive their youth”, using irony and banter as powerful means of promotion. Bringing together different theoretical frameworks of irony that are usually described as competing, this chapter highlights how expectations are twisted in the “text-world” of the video through the use of (mock) dramatic irony, generating pragmatic paradoxes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Dramatic irony in the Text World
    • 2.1Twisted expectations
    • 2.2Incongruous subject positions
  • 3.Processing irony and banter
    • 3.1 Mock dramatic irony
    • 3.2Irony and banter
  • 4.The pragmatic functions of irony
    • 4.1 Echoic relevance
    • 4.2Two birds (at least) with one stone
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.10sor
References (53)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbe, Katharina. 1993. Isn’t it ironic that…? Explicit irony markers. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 578–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Irony in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. 2012. The Language of Fictional Television. Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Black, Elizabeth. 2006. Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Gerrig, Richard. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Haugh, Michael. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Kaplan, Joan & Winner, Ellen. 2007. Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 297–317. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5): 1284–1299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1628–1644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 27(4): 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna & Lahey, Ernestine. 2016. World building in discourse. In World Building. Discourse in the Mind, Joanna Gavins & Ernestine Lahey (eds), 1–13. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., O’Brien, Jennifer & Doolittle, Shelley. 1995. Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes 20: 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1995. On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Discourse coherence and the theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately? In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 19–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 1999. On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer, Laadan, Dafna, Wolfson, Jon, Zeituny, Michal, Kidrons, Ran, Kaufman, Ronnie & Shaham, Ronit. 2007. Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol 22(2): 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2(2): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House of Cards. 2013-2015. Seasons 1-3. Network: Netflix. Writers: Beau Willimon, Michael Dobbs, Andrew Davies (among others). Directors: Robin Wright, David Fincher, James Foley, Joel Schumacher, Charles McDougall.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 1994. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kim “Howard”. 1999. The First 280 Years of the Monty Python. New York NY: Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary. 2007. How about another piece of pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 57–95. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1977. Language and Tact [Series A, Paper No. 46]. Trier: Linguistic Agency University of Trier. (Reprinted with revisions in Leech, Geoffrey. 1980. Exploration in Semantics and Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond I:5], 79-117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lugea, Jane. 2013. Embedded dialogue and dreams: The worlds and accessibility relations of Inception . Language and Literature 22(2): 133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marszalek, Agnes. 2016. The humorous worlds of film comedy. In World Building. Discourse in the Mind, Joanna Gavins & Ernestine Lahey (eds), 203–219. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Morini, Massimiliano. 2016. Irony in Dickens’ Nicholas Nickleby: Rhetoric, pragmatics, voice and point of view. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.), 553–566. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Muecke, Douglas Colin. 1969. The Compass of Irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne. 2006. Investigating Media Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peleg, Orna, Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 2008. Resisting contextual information: You can’t put a salient meaning down. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4: 13–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham. 1982. Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Analyzing Discourse. Text and Talk, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Shelley, Cameron. 2001. The bicoherence theory of situational irony. Cognitive Science 25: 775–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the Discourse of Satire [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid.” Towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre, Wilson. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive Poetics, An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Utsumi, Akira. 2000. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.