Chapter published in:
Experiencing Fictional Worlds
Edited by Benedict Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 32] 2019
► pp. 97117
References

References

Böhm, E. and Dennerlein, K.
(eds) 2016Der Bildungsroman im literarischen Feld. Neue Perspektiven auf eine Gattung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Butler, M.
2008Explanatory Notes. In Mary Shelley: Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. The 1818 Text, M. Butler (ed.), 252–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
von Chamisso, A.
1843The Wonderful History of Peter Schlemihl. Translated by William Howitt. New York: Burgess and Stringer. Facsimile available online, https://​archive​.org​/stream​/wonderfulhistor00howigoog​/page​/n0> (31 October 2017).Google Scholar
1975Peter Schlemihls wundersame Geschichte. In Sämtliche Werke in zwei Bänden: Nach dem Text der Ausgaben letzter Hand und den Handschriften von Adelbert von Chamisso, V. Hoffmann (ed.), Vol. 1, 13–67. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. and Vandelanotte, L.
2009Judging distances: Mental spaces, distance, and viewpoint in literary discourse. In Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, G. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds), 319–370. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.
1980Text, Discourse, and Process: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science of Text. Norwood, NJ: ABLEX.Google Scholar
Emmott, C.
1999Narrative Comprehension. A Discourse Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M.
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1982Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–254.Google Scholar
Fricke, H. and Müller, R.
2010Cognitive poetics meets hermeneutics. Some considerations about the German reception of cognitive poetics. Mythos Magazin 6, http://​www​.mythos​-magazin​.de​/erklaerendehermeneutik​/hf​-rm​_cognitivepoetics​.pdf> (31 October 2017).Google Scholar
Gaiman, N.
2005Neverwhere. London: Headline.Google Scholar
Galbraith, M.
1995Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In Deixis in Narrative. A Cognitive Science Perspective, J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder and L. E. Hewitt (eds), 19–59. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gavins, J.
2007Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gawron, J.-M.
2011Frame Semantics. In Semantics [HSK 33(1)], C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds), 664–687. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Genette, G.
1987Seuils. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
1974Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gomel, E.
2014Narrative Space and Time. Representing Impossible Topologies in Literature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. and Carpenter, J. M. A.
2011Transporting into narrative worlds. New directions for the scientific study of literature. Scientific Study of Literature 1(1) [Special Issue: The Future of Scientific Studies in Literature]: 113–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grishakova, M.
2009Beyond the Frame: Cognitive Science, Common Sense and Fiction. Narrative 17(2): 188–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Igl, N.
2016aRomantische Rahmen-Binnen-Konstruktionen als ‘mapping’ von inner- und außertextuellen Räumen. In Schlüsselkonzepte und Anwendungen der Kognitiven Literaturwissenschaft, R. Mikuláš and S. Wege (eds), 81–100. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar
2016bThe double-layered structure of narrative discourse and complex strategies of perspectivization. In Perspectives on Narrativity and Narrative Perspectivization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 21], N. Igl and S. Zeman (eds), 91–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N.
1980Mental Models in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science 4: 71–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W.
1988The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model. Psychological Review 95(2): 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ljungberg, C.
2012Creative Dynamics: Diagrammatic Strategies in Narrative. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mellmann, K.
2007Biologische Ansätze zum Verhältnis von Literatur und Emotionen. Journal of Literary Theory 1(2): 357–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M.
1974 [1975] A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, H. P. Winston (ed.), 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill. First published as MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June 1974, http://​web​.media​.mit​.edu​/~minsky​/papers​/Frames​/frames​.html> (31 October 2017).Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J. and Walsh, R.
2015Ten Theses about Fictionality. Narrative 23(1): 61–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orosz, M.
1999Raumsemantik und Modalität. KODIKAS/CODE. Ars Semeiotica 22(1–2) [Special Issue: Räume, Grenzen, Grenzüberschreitungen]: 13–24.Google Scholar
Pascual, E.
2014Fictive Interaction. The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 47]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascual, E. and Sandler, S.
2016Fictive interaction and the conversation frame. An overview. In The Conversation Frame. Forms and functions of fictive interaction [Human Cognitive Processing 55], E. Pascual and S. Sandler (eds), 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quendler, C.
2008Novel Beginnings: Initial Framings as a Historical Category of American Fiction. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 56(4): 337–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Interfaces of Fiction. Initial Framings in the American Novel from 1790 to 1900. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Rapaport, W. J. et al.
1989 [1994]. Deictic Centers and the Cognitive Structure of Narrative Comprehension. Center for Cognitive Science State University of New York at Buffalo 26 May 1994 [slightly updated version of Technical Report 89–01, SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science 1989], <http://​www​.cse​.buffalo​.edu​/~rapaport​/Papers​/DC​.knuf​.pdf> (31 October 2017).Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L.
1991Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
2004Introduction. In Narrative across Media. The Languages of Storytelling, M.-L. Ryan (ed.), 1–39. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P.
1977Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Segal, E. M.
1995Narrative comprehension and the role of Deictic Shift Theory. In Deixis in Narrative. A Cognitive Science Perspective, J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder and L. E. Hewitt (eds), 3–17. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Seibel, K.
2014“Read, friend, and enter!” Generic world construction in fantastic texts. In Writing Worlds. Welten- und Raummodelle der Fantastik, P. Klenke, L. Muth, K. Seibel and A. Simonis (eds), 225–240. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Shelley, M.
1818 [2008] Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. The 1818 Text. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Marilyn Butler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
2000 [2014] The Poetics of Science Fiction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tobin, V.
2014Readers as overhearers and texts as objects: joint attention in reading communities. SCRIPTA (Belo Horizonte) 18(34): 179–198.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L.
2001Does Beauty Build Adapted Minds? Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Aesthetics, Fiction, and the Arts. SubStance 30(94/95): 6–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M.
1996The Literary Mind. The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015Blending in Language and Communication. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. E. Dąbrowska and D. Divjak (eds), 211–232. Boston: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Utell, J.
2016Engagements with Narrative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wirth, U.
2009Paratext und Text als Übergangszone. In Raum und Bewegung in der Literatur, B. Neumann and W. Hallet (eds), 167–180. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
2008Die Geburt des Autors aus dem Geist der Herausgeberfiktion: Editoriale Rahmung im Roman um 1800: Wieland, Goethe, Brentano, Jean Paul und E. T. A. Hoffmann. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Wolf, W.
1998Paratext. In Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie, A. Nünning (ed.), 413–414. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
1999Framing Fiction: Reflections on a Narratological Concept and an Example: Bradbury, Mesonge. In Grenzüberschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext / Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Context, W. Grünzweig and A. Solbach (eds), 97–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2006Frames, Framing and Framing Borders in Literature and Other Media. In Framing Borders in Literature and Other Media, W. Bernhart and W. Wolf (eds), 1–40. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Young, K.
2004Frame and Boundary in the Phenomenology of Narrative. In Narrative Across Media. The Languages of Storytelling, M.-L. Ryan (ed.), 76–107. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Zeman, S.
2016Perspectivization as a link between narrative micro- and macro-structure. In Perspectives on Narrativity and Narrative Perspectivization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 21], N. Igl and S. Zeman (eds), 17–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar