Cover not available
Part of
Experiencing Fictional Worlds
Edited by Benedict Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 32] 2019
► pp. 135–154

Chapter 8
Cognitive grammar and reconstrual

Re-experiencing Margaret Atwood’s “The Freeze-Dried Groom”

This chapter examines the cognitive and experiential processes of re-reading, and their contribution to the conceptualisation of a fictional world. Fictional worlds are experienced dynamically, and often in multiple sittings, separated by varying lengths of time. While the myriad of contextual factors which distinguish sittings makes re-reading a difficult object of study, this aspect of our natural, everyday encounters with texts is worthy of consideration in stylistic discussion. As a first step in this direction, this chapter demonstrates an awareness of multiple readings, and the distinct experiences they represent, as part of a cognitive stylistic account of textual interpretation.
Firstly, a theoretical account of re-reading is outlined in terms of Cognitive Grammar and, in particular, its concept of construal. This account is demonstrated through analysis of the short story “The Freeze-Dried Groom” from Margaret Atwood’s 2014a collection Stone Mattress. Applying Cognitive Grammar's multidimensional model of construal, and a further process of reconstrual, we make specific predictions concerning readers’ experiences of this story’s fictional world on a first- and second-reading, looking in particular at changing conceptualisations of tone, atmosphere and narrative perspective, and the linguistic processing responsible. Based on this analytical case study, we propose a need for further investigation of texts which surprise readers, or which feature a twist or reveal, and the ways in which information is attended to across multiple readings.
Keywords: re-reading, Cognitive Grammar, Margaret Atwood, Stone Mattress , reconstrual
Article outline
  • 8.1Introduction
  • 8.2Cognitive Grammar as stylistic tool
    • 8.2.1Focusing and specificity
    • 8.2.2Prominence and reference point chains
    • 8.2.3Subjective and objective construal
  • 8.3Margaret Atwood’s “The Freeze-Dried Groom”
  • 8.4Analysis
    • 8.4.1Atmosphere and tone
    • 8.4.2Cohesion and coherence
  • 8.5The importance of re-reading
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.32.08har
References (50)
References
Atwood, M. 2014a. The Freeze-Dried Groom. In Stone Mattress: Nine Wicked Tales, 135–165. London: Virago, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2014b. About the Contest. Wattpad, <[URL]> (4 January 2017).Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beattie, S. W. 2014. Author returns with tales of mortality; Righteous anger, biting wit hallmarks of tone in collection. The Gazette [Montreal, Que], 22 September 2014.Google Scholar
Bray, J. 2007. The ‘dual voice’ of free indirect discourse: a reading experiment. Language and Literature 16(1): 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E. and Divjak, E. 2015. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C. and Leung, A. 1993. Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations. Poetics 22: 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C. 1997. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003. Reading for Pleasure: A cognitive poetic analysis of ‘twists in the tale’ and other plot reversals in narrative texts. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins and G. Steen (eds), 145–159. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emmott, C., and Alexander, M. 2014. Foregrounding, Burying and Plot Construction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell and S. Whiteley (eds), 329–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2000. Absurd tricks with bicycle frames in the text world of The Third Policeman . Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 15.Google Scholar
2007. Text World Theory an Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gill, I. 2014. A matter of perspective. Financial Express [New Delhi, India], 16 November 2014.Google Scholar
Goodreads. 2014–2016. Community reviews of Stone Mattress by Margaret Atwood (Althea Ann, Annet, Julie, Kinga, Maciek, Veronica) <[URL]> (1 December 2016).
Hamilton, C. 2003. A cognitive grammar of ‘Hospital Barge’ by Wilfred Owen. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins and G. Steen (eds), 55–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F. 2004. Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes 38(2): 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. 2017a. Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b. Finding Elizabeth: Construing memory in Elizabeth Is Missing by Emma Healey. Journal of Literary Semantics 46(2): 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. and Nuttall, L. 2018 .Re-reading in stylistics. Language and Literature 27(3): 176–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. and Yuan, W. (eds). 2014. Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. 2011. Moving beyond metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA: Construal operations in immigration discourse. In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, C. Hart (ed.), 171–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. 1985. The texture of a text. In Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan (eds), 70–96. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, D. 2009. Beyond voice and vision: Cognitive grammar and focalization theory. In Point of View, Perspective, and Focalization: Modeling Mediation in Narrative, P. Hühn, W. Schmid, and J. Schönert (eds), 119–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoeken, H. and van Vliet, M. 2000. Suspense, curiosity, and surprise: How discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story. Poetics 27(4): 277–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2, Decriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 29(2): 77–193.Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Guin, U. 2014. Stone Mattress: Nine Tales, by Margaret Atwood. The Financial Times, 12 September 2014, <[URL]> (1 April 2016).Google Scholar
Leech, G. and Short, M. 2007. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Miall, D. and Kuiken, D. 1994. Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics 22: 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millis, K. K. 1995. Encoding discourse perspective during the reading of a literary text. Poetics 23 (3): 235–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millis, K. K., Simon, S., and TenBroek, N. S. 1998. Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition 26(2): 232–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, L. 2014. Constructing a text world for The Handmaid’s Tale. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature, C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell, and W. Yuan (eds), 83–99. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend . Language and Literature 24(1): 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Mind Style and Cognitive Grammar: Language and Worldview in Speculative Fiction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Prieto-Pablos, J. A. 1998. The paradox of suspense. Poetics 26(2): 99–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. and Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Semino, E. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sternberg, M. 1978. Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2009. Texture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2014. Atmosphere and tone. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell and S. Whiteley (eds), 360–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobin, V. 2009. Cognitive bias and the poetics of surprise. Language and Literature 18(2): 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H.-J. 2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson-Longman.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. 2007. Construal and perspectivization. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds), 48–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Boucher, Abigail, Marcello Giovanelli, Chloe Harrison, Robbie Love & Caroline Godfrey
2024. Re-reading in the Pandemic. In Reading Habits in the COVID-19 Pandemic, ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello & Chloe Harrison
2022. Cognitive Grammar in the Classroom: A Case Study. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century, ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Chloe & Marcello Giovanelli
2022. “Traits Don't Change, States of Mind Do”: Tracking Olive in Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout. English Studies 103:3 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Chloe
2020. ‘The truth is we’re watching each other’: Voiceover narration as ‘split self’ presentation in The Handmaid’s Tale TV series. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Rundquist, Eric
2020. Literary meaning as character conceptualization: Re-orienting the cognitive stylistic analysis of character discourse and Free Indirect Thought. Journal of Literary Semantics 49:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
2019. Construing and reconstruing the horrors of the trench: Siegfried Sassoon, creativity and context. Journal of Literary Semantics 48:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
2022. Cognitive Grammar. In The Language of Siegfried Sassoon [Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
2022. Cognitive Grammar and Readers’ Perceived Sense of Closeness: A Study of Responses to Mary Borden’s ‘Belgium’. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.