Chapter 10
Experiencing literature in the poetry classroom
This chapter reports on a small-scale study of studying fiction in the secondary classroom to explore how a sequence of lessons on Gillian Clarke’s poem “Cold Knap Lake” is experienced by a group of fifteen-year-old students in a UK school. In the context of the performativity agenda that persists in schools, some researchers have argued that the classroom experience of reading poetry in particular has been subjected to a more transmissive method of delivery where students can be fearful of developing individual responses. In addition, the role of the teacher as a more powerful participant in the classroom means that decisions regarding what is read, how activities are framed and how responses are articulated are usually taken by the teacher. This chapter draws on Text World Theory (Werth 1999; Gavins 2007) and interthinking (Littleton and Mercer 2013) to account for the ways in which the students in this study respond to Clarke’s poem. The chapter shows that the teacher and the material aspects of the classroom appear to foreground certain ways of interpreting the poem and discussing it, but that students also engage in using a variety of different resources to help structure their learning and arrive at a satisfactory interpretation.
Article outline
- 10.1Introduction
- 10.2Studying literature in schools
- 10.3Experiencing “Cold Knap Lake”
- 10.3.1Experience as pre-figured response
- 10.3.2Experience as collaborative response
- 10.3.3Experience as divergent resourcing
- 10.4Conclusion
- Note
-
Note
-
References
References (43)
References
Alsup, J. 2015. A Case for Teaching Literature in the Secondary School: Why Reading Fiction Matters in an Age of Scientific Objectivity and Standardization. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ball, S. 2003. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benton, M., Teasey, J., Bell, R. and Hurst, K. 1988. Young Readers Responding to Poems. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, A. 2011. Tell Me: Children, Reading and Talk/The Reading Environment. Stroud: Thimble Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, C. and Rumbold, K. 2006. Reading for Pleasure: A Research Overview. London: National Literacy Trust.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clarke G. 1991. Letting in the Rumour. Manchester: Carcanet Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cliff Hodges, G. 2010. Reasons for reading: Why literature matters. Literacy 44(2): 60–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cremin, T. 2007. Revisiting reading for pleasure: Delight, desire and diversity. In Understanding Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: A Critical Perspective, K. Goouch and A. Lambirth (eds), 166–190. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dawes, L., Fisher, E. and Mercer, N. 1992. The quality of talk at the computer. Language and Learning 10: 22–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DESWO. 1989. English for Ages 5 to 16. London: HMSO.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DfE. 2013. English Programmes of Study: Key Stage 4: National Curriculum in England. London: HMSO.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dias, P. and Hayhoe, M. 1988. Developing Response to Poetry. Buckingham: Open University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dymoke, S. 2002. The dead hand of the exam: The impact of the NEAB anthology on poetry teaching at GCSE. Changing English 9(1): 85–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dymoke, S. 2012. Poetry is an unfamiliar text: Locating poetry in Secondary English classrooms in New Zealand and England during a period of curriculum change. Changing English 19(4): 395–410. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, A. and Westgate, D. 1994. Investigating Classroom Talk. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. 2012. Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. 2nd edn. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N. 2014. Language and Power. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, J. 2005. (Re)thinking modality: A text world perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 34(2): 79–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, J. and Lahey, E. 2016. World-building in discourse. In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins and E. Lahey (eds), 1–13. London: Bloomsbury Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gay, G. 2010. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research and Practice. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giovanelli, M. 2016. Text World Theory as cognitive grammatics: A pedagogical application in the secondary classroom. In World-Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins and E. Lahey (eds), 109–126. London: Bloomsbury Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giovanelli, M. and Mason, J. 2015. ‘Well I don’t feel that’: Schemas, worlds and authentic reading in the classroom. English in Education 49(1): 41–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwyn, A. 2010. The Expert Teacher of English. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwyn, A. 2016. Still growing after all these years? The resilience of the personal growth model of English in England and also internationally. English Teaching Practice and Critique 15(1): 7–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, J. 2004. Talk. In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. 2nd edn. D. Silverman (ed.), 222–245. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K. and Reid, E. 2005. English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littleton, K. and Mercer, N. 2013. Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mansworth, M. 2016. Creative potential within policy: An analysis of the 2013 English literature curriculum. English in Education 50(1): 116–129. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mason, J. 2016a. Narrative interrelation, intertextuality, and teachers’ knowledge about students’ reading. In Knowing about Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom, M. Giovanelli and D. Clayton (eds), 162–172. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mason, J. 2016b. Narrative Interrelation: A Cognitive Account of Intertextuality and its Application to the Study of Literature. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mason, J. and Giovanelli, M. 2017. ‘What do you think?’ Let me tell you: Discourse about texts and the literature classroom. Changing English 24(3): 318–329. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maybin, J. 2013. What counts as reading? PIRLS, EastEnders and ‘The man on the flying trapeze’. Literacy 47(2): 59–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P. and Whiteley, S. 2016. The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richards, I. A. 1929. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgement. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The Language of Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Bom, I. 2015. Text World Theory and Stories of Self: A Cognitive Discursive Approach to Identity. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walshaw, M. and Anthony, G. 2008. The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research 78(3): 516–551. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xerri, D. 2013. Colluding in the ‘torture’ of poetry: Shared beliefs and assessment. English in Education 47(2): 134–146. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yandell, J. 2013. The Social Construction of Meaning: Reading Literature in Urban English Classrooms. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yandell, J. and Brady, M. 2016. English and the politics of knowledge. English in Education 50(1): 44–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mason, Jessica
2022.
Teachers’ Intertextual Identities and English Education. In
Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century,
► pp. 263 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Norledge, Jessica
2022.
Building Dystopian Worlds. In
The Language of Dystopia [
Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ],
► pp. 61 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Statham, Simon
2020.
The year’s work in stylistics 2019.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4
► pp. 454 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.