Cover not available
Part of
Experiencing Fictional Worlds
Edited by Benedict Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 32] 2019
► pp. 177–198

Chapter 10
Experiencing literature in the poetry classroom

This chapter reports on a small-scale study of studying fiction in the secondary classroom to explore how a sequence of lessons on Gillian Clarke’s poem “Cold Knap Lake” is experienced by a group of fifteen-year-old students in a UK school. In the context of the performativity agenda that persists in schools, some researchers have argued that the classroom experience of reading poetry in particular has been subjected to a more transmissive method of delivery where students can be fearful of developing individual responses. In addition, the role of the teacher as a more powerful participant in the classroom means that decisions regarding what is read, how activities are framed and how responses are articulated are usually taken by the teacher. This chapter draws on Text World Theory (Werth 1999; Gavins 2007) and interthinking (Littleton and Mercer 2013) to account for the ways in which the students in this study respond to Clarke’s poem. The chapter shows that the teacher and the material aspects of the classroom appear to foreground certain ways of interpreting the poem and discussing it, but that students also engage in using a variety of different resources to help structure their learning and arrive at a satisfactory interpretation.
Keywords: Text World Theory, classroom discourse, reading literature, poetry teaching
Article outline
  • 10.1Introduction
  • 10.2Studying literature in schools
  • 10.3Experiencing “Cold Knap Lake”
    • 10.3.1Experience as pre-figured response
    • 10.3.2Experience as collaborative response
    • 10.3.3Experience as divergent resourcing
  • 10.4Conclusion
  • Note
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.32.10gio
References (43)
References
Alsup, J. 2015. A Case for Teaching Literature in the Secondary School: Why Reading Fiction Matters in an Age of Scientific Objectivity and Standardization. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, S. 2003. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benton, M., Teasey, J., Bell, R. and Hurst, K. 1988. Young Readers Responding to Poems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers, A. 2011. Tell Me: Children, Reading and Talk/The Reading Environment. Stroud: Thimble Press.Google Scholar
Clark, C. and Rumbold, K. 2006. Reading for Pleasure: A Research Overview. London: National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
Clarke G. 1991. Letting in the Rumour. Manchester: Carcanet Press.Google Scholar
Cliff Hodges, G. 2010. Reasons for reading: Why literature matters. Literacy 44(2): 60–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cremin, T. 2007. Revisiting reading for pleasure: Delight, desire and diversity. In Understanding Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: A Critical Perspective, K. Goouch and A. Lambirth (eds), 166–190. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Dawes, L., Fisher, E. and Mercer, N. 1992. The quality of talk at the computer. Language and Learning 10: 22–25.Google Scholar
DESWO. 1989. English for Ages 5 to 16. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DfE. 2013. English Programmes of Study: Key Stage 4: National Curriculum in England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dias, P. and Hayhoe, M. 1988. Developing Response to Poetry. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Dymoke, S. 2002. The dead hand of the exam: The impact of the NEAB anthology on poetry teaching at GCSE. Changing English 9(1): 85–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Poetry is an unfamiliar text: Locating poetry in Secondary English classrooms in New Zealand and England during a period of curriculum change. Changing English 19(4): 395–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. and Westgate, D. 1994. Investigating Classroom Talk. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. 2012. Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. 2nd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 2014. Language and Power. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2005. (Re)thinking modality: A text world perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 34(2): 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. and Lahey, E. 2016. World-building in discourse. In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins and E. Lahey (eds), 1–13. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Gay, G. 2010. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research and Practice. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M. 2016. Text World Theory as cognitive grammatics: A pedagogical application in the secondary classroom. In World-Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins and E. Lahey (eds), 109–126. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M. and Mason, J. 2015. ‘Well I don’t feel that’: Schemas, worlds and authentic reading in the classroom. English in Education 49(1): 41–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwyn, A. 2010. The Expert Teacher of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016. Still growing after all these years? The resilience of the personal growth model of English in England and also internationally. English Teaching Practice and Critique 15(1): 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 2004. Talk. In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. 2nd edn. D. Silverman (ed.), 222–245. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K. and Reid, E. 2005. English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Littleton, K. and Mercer, N. 2013. Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mansworth, M. 2016. Creative potential within policy: An analysis of the 2013 English literature curriculum. English in Education 50(1): 116–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. 2016a. Narrative interrelation, intertextuality, and teachers’ knowledge about students’ reading. In Knowing about Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom, M. Giovanelli and D. Clayton (eds), 162–172. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016b. Narrative Interrelation: A Cognitive Account of Intertextuality and its Application to the Study of Literature. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Mason, J. and Giovanelli, M. 2017. ‘What do you think?’ Let me tell you: Discourse about texts and the literature classroom. Changing English 24(3): 318–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maybin, J. 2013. What counts as reading? PIRLS, EastEnders and ‘The man on the flying trapeze’. Literacy 47(2): 59–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P. and Whiteley, S. 2016. The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. 1929. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The Language of Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Bom, I. 2015. Text World Theory and Stories of Self: A Cognitive Discursive Approach to Identity. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Walshaw, M. and Anthony, G. 2008. The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research 78(3): 516–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Xerri, D. 2013. Colluding in the ‘torture’ of poetry: Shared beliefs and assessment. English in Education 47(2): 134–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yandell, J. 2013. The Social Construction of Meaning: Reading Literature in Urban English Classrooms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yandell, J. and Brady, M. 2016. English and the politics of knowledge. English in Education 50(1): 44–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Mason, Jessica
2022. Teachers’ Intertextual Identities and English Education. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Norledge, Jessica
2022. Building Dystopian Worlds. In The Language of Dystopia [Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ], ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.