Intertextuality in Practice

Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027203427 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027262318 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
The books we’ve read, the films we’ve seen, the stories we’ve heard - and just as importantly the ones we haven’t – form an integral part of our identity. Recognising a reference to a text can result in feelings of pleasure, expertise and even smugness; being lost as to a reference’s possible significance can lead to alienation from a text or conversation. Intertextuality in Practice offers readers a cognitively-grounded framework for hands-on analysis of intertextuality, both in written texts and spoken discourse. The book offers a historical overview of existing research, highlighting that most of this work focuses on what intertextuality ‘is’ conceptually, rather than how it can be identified, described and analysed. Drawing on research from literary criticism, neuroscience, linguistics and sociology, this book proposes a cognitive stylistic approach, presenting the ‘narrative interrelation framework’ as a way of operationalising the concept of intertextuality to enable close practical analysis.
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 33]  2019.  xi, 204 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.33
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction: History and a new approach
1–24
Acknowledgements
Chapter 2. Forms and functions of intertextuality
25–60
Chapter 3. Narrative interrelation framework: A cognitive account of intertextuality
61–88
Chapter 4. Analysing ‘marked’ intertextual references
89–113
Chapter 5. Analysing ‘unmarked’ intertextual references
115–134
Chapter 6. Intertextuality, identity and characterisation: Readers
135–151
Chapter 7. Intertextuality, identity and characterisation: Texts
153–166
Chapter 8. Analysing intratextual references
167–184
Chapter 9. Intertextuality in practice: Looking forward
185–187
References
189–201
Index
References

References

Allen, G.
2000 Intertextuality, London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allington, D. & Swann, J.
2009 ‘Researching literary reading as social practice’, in Daniel Allington and Joan Swann (eds.) Literary Reading as Social Practice. Special Issue of Language and Literature 18 (3): 219–230.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R.
1983 The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, L.
2014 AntConc (Version 3.4.1w) (Windows). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net/
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D.
2007 Social Psychology, Sixth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Ashford, K.
2016 ‘How reluctant readers learn to love reading’. In K. Birbalsingh (Ed.) Battle Hymn of the Tiger Teachers: The Michaela Way. Woodbridge: John Catt Educational Ltd., pp. 40-45.Google Scholar
Avon, R.
2013 The Seducer’s Diary. CreateSpace, Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
1981 [1975]) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (ed. M. Holquist, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1984a [1963]) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (ed. & trans. C. Emerson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984b [1968]) Rabelais and His World (trans. H. Iswolsky). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (eds. C. Emerson & M. Holquist, trans. V. W. McGee). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bal, M.
1985 Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bal, P. M. & Veltkamp, M.
2013 ‘How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation’. PLoS ONE 8(1): e55341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.
2008 ‘Grounded cognition’. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R.
1977 Image-Music-Text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F.
1932 Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bayard, P. (trans. J. Mehlman
) 2008 How to Talk About Books You Haven’t Read. London: Granta Publications.Google Scholar
Bayard, P.
2008 How to Talk About Books You Haven’t Read. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Bennett, A.
2004 The History Boys: A Play. Great Britain: Faber and Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
BNC
2007 British National Corpus Online. Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of BNC Consortium.Google Scholar
BNC XML Edition
2007 The British National Corpus, version 3. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available at: http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M.
2002 ‘The role of body and mind in abstract thought’. Psychological Science 13(2): 185–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P.
2003 Psychonarratology: Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Minding the text: Memory for literary narrative. Stories and minds: Cognitive approaches to literary narrative, 23–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brontë, E.
1847[1995]. Wuthering Heights. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Browse, S.
2018 Cognitive Rhetoric: The Cognitive Poetics of Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Budanovic, N.
2017 ‘“For sale, baby shoes, never worn”: Tracing the history of the shortest story ever told’, The Vintage News, 24 September 2017. Accessed on 3 October 2018. Available at: https://​goo​.gl​/oYYTr9Google Scholar
Bruner, J.
1991 ‘The narrative construction of reality’, Critical Inquiry 18(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M.
2014 ‘Rhetoric and poetics: the classical heritage of stylistics’, in M. Burke, (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London: Routledge, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Brontë, C.
1847[2006] Jane Eyre. London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Cantor, J.
2004 ‘“I’ll never have a clown in my house” – Why movie horror lives on’, Poetics Today 25(2): 283–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, K-U.
2007 ‘Spatio-temporal ontologies and attention’, Spatial Cognition and Computation 7(1): 13–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. & Nash, W.
1990 Seeing through Language: Styles of English Writing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
1993 ‘Between languages: grammar and lexis in Thomas Hardy’s “The Oxen”’ in P. Verdonk (ed.) Twentieth Century Poetry: From Text to Context. London: Routledge, pp. 84–93.Google Scholar
2004 Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008 ‘Style and interpretation in Hemingway’s Cat in the Rain ’ in R. Carter and P. Stockwell (eds.) The Language and Literature Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 230–243.Google Scholar
Carter, R. & Stockwell, P.
(Eds.) 2008 The Language and Literature Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
2010 ‘Methodologies for stylistic analysis: Pedagogies and practices’ in D. McIntyre and B. Busse (eds.) Language and Style: In Honour of Mick Short. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, M., Pette, C. & Burbaum, C.
2004 ‘Reading strategies in everyday life: Different ways of reading a novel which make a distinction’, Poetics Today 25(2): 241–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, S.
1978 Story and Discourse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T.H.
1997 ‘Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide’, The Journal of Learning Sciences 6(3): 271–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1966 Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar. The Netherlands: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
1972 Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Clark, B.
2013 Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. & Douglas, J.
2011 Young People’s Reading and Writing: An In-Depth Study Focusing on Enjoyment, Behaviour, Attitudes and Attainment. London: National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
Clark, C. & Osbourne, S.
2008 How Does Age Relate to Pupils’ Perceptions of Themselves as Readers?. London: National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
Cook, G.
1994 Discourse and Literature: The Interplay of Form and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, B.
1992 The Great Betrayal: Memoirs of a Life in Education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Cremin, T.
2010 ‘Motivating children to read through literature’ in Fletcher, J., Parkhill, F. & Gillon, G. (eds.) Motivating Literacy Learners in Today’s World. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
2011 ‘Reading Teachers/Teaching Readers’. English Drama Media 19(1)Google Scholar
Cremin, T., Mottram, M., Bearne, E. & Goodwin, P.
2008 ‘Exploring teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature’, Cambridge Journal of Education 38(4): 449–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cremin, T., Mottram, M., Collins, F. M., Powell, S. & Safford, K.
2014 Building Communities of Engaged Readers: Reading for Pleasure. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
2001 Language and Characterisation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, R.
1987 ‘Schemas for literary communication’, in L. Hàlàsz (ed.) Literary Discourse: Aspects of Cognitive and Social Psychological Approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter. pp. 49–99.Google Scholar
Day, S. & Gentner, D.
2007 ‘Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension’, Memory and Cognition 35: 39-49.Google Scholar
Dean, G.
2003 Teaching Reading in Secondary Schools. London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S.
2009 Reading in the Brain. Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
DES
1989 English for Ages 5 to 16. Cox Report. London: DES.Google Scholar
DfE
2013 English Programmes of Study: Key Stage 3. National Curriculum in England. Department for Education: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
Dickenson, P.
2010 ‘Developments in English: Text2txt’ in S. Clarke, P. Dickenson & J. Westbrook (eds.) The Complete Guide to Becoming an English Teacher, Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 15–33.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. van and Kintsch, W.
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duncan-Andrade, J. & Morrell, E.
2008 The Art of Critical Pedagogy Possibilities for Moving from Theory to Practice in Urban Schools. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Duncan-Andrade, J.
2009 ‘Note to educators: hope required when growing roses in concrete’, Harvard Educational Review 79(2): 181–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 ‘Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete’, Keynote speech at the Graduate School of Education: Alumni of Color Conference , Harvard University, 26 February 2010. Accessed 4th February 2015: http://​goo​.gl​/55BlIm
Edwards, D. & Mercer, N.
1993 Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom, Second Edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. & Alexander, M.
2014 ‘Foregrounding, burying and plot construction’ in P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 329–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C.
1997 Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. & Simon, H.
1980 ‘Verbal reports as data’, Psychological Review 87(3): 215–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 ‘Verbal reports on thinking’ in C. Faerch and G. Kasper (eds.) Introspection in Second Language Research. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 24–54.Google Scholar
Erikkson, K.
2002 ‘Booktalk dilemmas: Teachers' organisation of pupils' reading’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46(4): 391–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Errikson Barajas, K. & Aronsson, K.
2009 ‘Avid versus struggling readers: co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk’, Language and Literature 18(3): 281–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1992 ‘Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis’, Linguistics and Education 4(3): 269–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M.
1996 Towards a Natural Narratology. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 An Introduction to Narratology. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. & Steen, G.
2003 Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. & Stockwell, P.
2012 ‘About the heart, where it hurt exactly, and how often’, Language and Literature 21(1): 33–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J.
2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Reading the Absurd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. & Lahey, E.
(eds.) 2016 World Building: Discourse in the Mind. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (trans. C. Newman, & C. Doubinsky
) ([1981] 1984) Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. USA: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (trans. J. E. Lewin
) ([1979] 1992) The Architext: An Introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
) ([1987] 1997) Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gentner D.
1989 ‘The mechanisms of analogical learning’ in S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Markman, A. B.
1995 ‘Similarity is like analogy: Structural alignment in comparison’ in C. Cacciari (ed.) Similarity in Language, Thought and Perception. Brussells: BREPOLS, pp. 111–147.Google Scholar
Gentner, D.
1999 ‘Analogy’. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia Of The Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.17-20.Google Scholar
2010 ‘Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems’, Cognitive Science 34 (5): 752–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. & Rapp, D.
2004 ‘Psychological processes underlying literary impact’, Poetics Today 25(2): 265–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J.
1993 Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, S.
2013b ‘The aims of English teaching: A view from history’, Changing English 20(2): 138–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a ‘Initial reactions from the NATE Chair to the 2013 curriculum draft’. Accessed 29 July 2015. Available at: http://​goo​.gl​/7Ih8Ek
Gibbons, S.
2014 The London Association for the Teaching of English 1947–67: A history. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
2016 ‘W(h)ither the radicals?’, English in Education 50(1): 35–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 English and Its Teachers: A History of Pedagogy, Policy and Practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A. & Whiteley, S.
2018 Contemporary Stylistics: Language, Cognition, Interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
1994 The Poetics of the Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: CUP.Google Scholar
2006 Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M.
2013 Text World Theory and Keats’ Poetry: The Cognitive Poetics of Desire, Dreams and Nightmares. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M. & Mason, J.
2015 ‘“Well I don’t feel that”: Schemas, worlds and authentic reading in the classroom’, English in Education 49(1): 41–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 The Language of Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, J.
2012 The Fault in Our Stars. Great Britain: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, A. & Findlay, K.
1999 ‘The Cox Models revisited: English teachers’ views of their subject and the National Curriculum’, English in Education 33(2): 19–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gove, M.
2011 ‘A Liberal Education’. Speech at Cambridge University, UK, 11 November 2011. Transcript available at: http://​goo​.gl​/hdAXzh. Accessed 20 May 2016.
2013a ‘We must return to traditional teaching values’, Mail Online. First published 25 November 2011. Accessed 25 July 2015: http://​goo​.gl​/Dbzkd5Google Scholar
2013b ‘I refuse to surrender to the Marxist teachers hell-bent on destroying our schools’, Mail Online. First published 23 March 2013. Accessed 1 April 2015: http://​goo​.gl​/5SQBeGoogle Scholar
Golding, W.
1954 Lord of the Flies. London: Faber and Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
Griemas, A.
1966 Sémantique Structurale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Guilliory, J.
1994 Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hall, G.
2009 ‘Texts, readers – and real readers’, Language and Literature 18(3): 331–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 'Stylistics and literary theory' in V. Sotirova (ed.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London, New York: Bloomsbury, pp244-62.Google Scholar
Hardy, T.
1891[2007]. Tess of the d’Urbervilles. London: Penguin Popular Classics.
Halliday, M. A.K.
1971 ‘Linguistic function and literary style: an enquiry into the language of William Golding's The Inheritors ’ in S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C.
2014 ‘Stylistics as rhetoric’ in P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 63–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C.
2013 ‘Cognitive Discourse Grammar in Contemporary Literature’, PhD Thesis . Unpublished: University of Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. and Yuan, W.
(eds) 2014 Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. & Stockwell, P.
2014 ‘Cognitive poetics’ in J. Littlemore and J. R. Taylor (eds.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 218–233.Google Scholar
Harrison, C.
2017 Cognitive Discourse Grammar in Contemporary Fiction. New York, Linguistic Approaches to Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, D.
1992 ‘Intertextuality and reading: The text, the author and the context’, Linguistics and Education 4(3):Google Scholar
Hartman, D. K.
1995 ‘Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages’, Reading Research Quarterly 30(3): 520–561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 ‘Deconstructing the reader, the text, the author and the context: intertextuality and reading from a “cognitive” perspective’ in N. Shuart-Faris and D. Bloome (eds.) Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research. USA: Information Age Publishing, pp. 353–372.Google Scholar
Herman, D.
2009 Basic Elements of Narrative. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M.
2007 ‘Emotion simulation during language comprehension’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(3): 436–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heaps, C. & Nash, M.
2001 ‘Comparing recollective experiences in true and false autobiographical memories’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27: 920–930.Google Scholar
Herman, D.
2002 Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Herman, D., Jahn, M. & Ryan, M. L.
(eds.) 2005 Routledge Encyclopaedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L.
2000 Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hirsch. Jr, E. D.
1988 Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. USA: Random House.Google Scholar
2007: The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Education Gap for American Children. USA: Mariner Book.Google Scholar
Honeyman, G.
2017 Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Hühn, P.
2009 ‘Event and eventfulness’ in P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid, & J. Schönert (eds.) Handbook of Narratology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 80–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Eventfulness in British Fiction. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Iser, W.
1974 The Implied Reader. USA: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
James, E. L.
2011 Fifty Shades of Grey. Australia; USA: The Writer’s Coffee Shop.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L. & McIntyre, D.
2010 Stylistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I.
1781 Critic der reinen Bernunft (The Critique of Pure Reason). Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. & Greene, E.
1978 ‘The role of culture-specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories’, Discourse Processes 1: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. & van Dijk, T.
1975 ‘Recalling and summarizing stories’, Language 40: 98–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978 ‘Toward a model of text comprehension and production’, Psychological Review 85: 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
1974 The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1977 ‘On comprehending stories’ in M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter (eds.) Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 33–62.Google Scholar
Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D.
1996 ‘Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity’, Child Development 67: 2797–2822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kovecses, Z.
2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J.
1980 Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (ed. L. S. Roudiez, trans. T. Gora, A. Jardine & L. S. Roudiez). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1981 ‘Word, dialogue and novel’ in A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 64–91.Google Scholar
1986 The Kristeva Reader (ed. T. Mori). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J.
1967 ‘Narrative analysis’, in J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 12–44.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R. & Sathian, K.
2012 ‘Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex’, Brain and Language 120(3): 416–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laing, O.
2016 The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone.. Edinburgh: Canongate Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1990 ‘The invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image schemas?’ Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Canada: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M.
2007 Style in Fiction, Second Edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L.
1992 ‘Intertextuality and educational research’, Linguistics and Education 4(3): 257–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I.
1972 The Stepford Wives. USA: Penguin Random House LLC.Google Scholar
Lerner, I., Bentin, S. & Shriki, O.
2012 ‘Spreading activation in an attractor network with latching dynamics: automatic semantic priming revisited’, Cognitive Science 36(8): 1339–1382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liebniz, G.
1710 Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l'homme et l'origine du mal (The Theodocy). Amsterdam: I. Troyel.Google Scholar
Louw, B. & Milojkovic, M.
2016 Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext . Linguistic Approaches to Literature Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. & Pickerell, J.
1995 ‘The formation of false memories’, Psychiatric Annals 25: 720–725. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, A.
2014 ‘Teaching narrative, genre and point of view’ Integrating English Annual Conference , University of Nottingham, UK, 19 June 2014.
2016 ‘Stylistics’ in M. Giovanelli and D. Clayton (eds.) Knowing about Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom. London: Routledge, pp. 51–63.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
2012 ‘The corpus stylistic analysis of fiction – or the fiction of corpus stylistics?’ in J. Mukherjee and M. Huber (eds.) Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 77–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D.
2005 ‘Nonintentional similarity processing’. In T. Hassin, J,. Bargh and J. Uleman (Eds.), The New Unconscious . New York: Oxford University Press, pp.107-137.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
2014 ‘Corpus stylistics’ in M. Burke (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London: Routledge, pp. 378–392.Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K. & Peterson, J. B.
2009 ‘Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes’, Communications 34: 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G.
1990 Pretty Woman. USA: Buena Vista Pictures.Google Scholar
Mason, J.
2014 ‘Narrative’ in P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 ‘Narrative interrelation, intertextuality and teachers’ knowledge of students’ reading’ in D. Clayton & M. Giovanelli (eds.) Knowing About Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom. London: Routledge, pp. 162–172.Google Scholar
2016 ‘Narrative interrelation, intertextuality and teachers’ knowledge of students’ reading’. In D. Clayton & M. Giovanelli (eds.) Knowing About Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom. London: Routledge, pp.162-172.Google Scholar
Mason, J. & Giovanelli, M.
2017 ‘What do you think?’ Let me tell you : discourse about texts and the literature classroom. Changing English 24 (1): 318–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McHale, B.
2012 ‘Postmodernism and experiment’, in J. Bray and A. Gibbons (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D.
2006 Point of View in Plays: A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Viewpoint in Drama and Other Text-Types. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S.
2006 Twilight: Twilight (Book 1). UK: Atom.Google Scholar
2007a New Moon: Twilight (Book 2). UK: Atom.Google Scholar
2007b Eclipse: Twilight (Book 3). UK: Atom.Google Scholar
2008 Breaking Dawn: Twilight (Book 4). UK: Atom.Google Scholar
Miall, D.
1988 ‘Affect and narrative: A model of response to stories’, Poetics 17: 259–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 ‘Beyond the schema given: affective comprehension of literary narratives’, Cognition and Emotion 3(1): 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Narayanan, S.
1997 KARMA: Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect. Unpublished UC Berkeley Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
Nolan, C.
2008 The Dark Knight. USA: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
2012 The Dark Knight Rises. USA: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
North, C.
2018 ‘About Amazon.co.uk: Overview’, Amazon UK. Accessed 3 October 2018. Available at: http://​goo​.gl​/x3wDCoGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, L.
2014 ‘Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend ’, Language and Literature 24(1):23–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
1999 ‘Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation’, Review of General Psychology 3(2): 101–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 ‘Emotions and the story world of fiction’ in M. C. Green, J. J. Strange and T. C. Block (eds.) Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 39–70.Google Scholar
OED
2016 “interrelation n.”, OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2016.Google Scholar
2018 “intertextuality n.”, OED Online. Oxford University Press May 2018.Google Scholar
Orne, M. T.
1962 ‘On the social psychology of the psychological experiment with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications’, American Psychologist 17: 776–783. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orr, M.
2003 Intertextuality: Debates and Contexts, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Orwell, G.
1945 Animal Farm. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pace, L. A., & Livingston, M. M.
2005 Protecting human subjects in Internet research. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics & Organizational Studies 10: 35–41.Google Scholar
Park, J. Y.
2012 ‘Reimaging reader-response in middle and secondary schools: early adolescent girls’ critical and communal reader responses to the young adult novel Speak ’, Children’s Literature in Education 43(1): 191–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peplow, D.
2011 ‘“Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people”: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation’, Language and Literature 20(4): 295–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perry, B. & Szalavitz, M.
2006 The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog: And Other Stories from a Child Psychiatrist’s Notebook. USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
1936 Origins of Intelligence in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1945 Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
1957 Construction of Reality in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1958 ‘The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence’, New York: Basic (84).Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T.
1952 The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York, NY: International University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porter, S., Yuille, J. C. & Lehman, D. R.
1999 ‘The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: implications for the recovered memory debate’, Law and Human Behavior 23(5): 517–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J.
1996 Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, G.
1982 Narratology: The Form and Function of Narrative. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Propp, V.
1958 The Morphology of the Folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran & Hirstein
1998 ‘The perception of phantom limbs: the D. O. Hebb lecture’, Brain 121: 1603–1630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. & Blakeslee
1998 Phantoms in the Brain. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. & Rogers-Ramachandran, D.
1996 ‘Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 263: 377–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riffaterre, M.
1987 ‘Intertextual Unconscious’, Critical Inquiry, Special Issue: The Trial(s) of Psychoanalysis 13(2): 371–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 ‘Compulsory reader response: The intertextual drive’ in Worton, M. & Still, J. (eds.) Intertextuality: Theories and Practices, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S.
1983 Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Methuen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robson, C.
2013 Real World Research, Third Edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, L.
1938 Literature as Exploration. New York: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
1978 The Reader, The Text, The Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart D.
1980 ‘Schemata: The building blocks of knowledge’ in R. Spiro, B. Bruce and W. Bewer (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D.
1975 ‘Notes on a schema for stories’ in D. Bobrow and A. Collins (eds.) Representation and Understanding. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E.
1984 ‘Schemata and the cognitive system’ in R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (eds.) Handbook of Social Cognition, Volume 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 161–188.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. and Norman, D. A.
1978 ‘Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning’ in J. W. Cotton and R. L. Klatzky (eds.) Semantic Factors in Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
Rundquist, E.
2014 ‘How is ‘Mrs Ramsey thinking? The semantic effects of consciousness presentation categories within the free indirect style’, Language and Literature 23(2): 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Free Indirect Style in Modernism: Representations of Consciousness. Linguistic Approaches to Literature. New York, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L.
1980 ‘Fiction, non-factual, and the principle of minimal departure’, Poetics 9(4): 403–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 ‘The Text as World versus the Text as Game’, Journal of Literary Semantics 27(3): 137–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 ‘Towards a definition of narrative’, in D. Herman (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 22–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sachar, L.
1999 Holes. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J. & Emmott, C.
2012 Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, J. & MacLeod, M. D.
2006 ‘Can inhibition resolve retrieval competition through the control of spreading activation?’, Memory & Cognition 34(2): 307–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de
(1916 / 1974 Course in General Linguistics (eds.) C. Bally & A. Sechehaye with A. Reidlinger, trans. W. Baskin). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Schank, R.
1982a Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1982b Reading and Understanding: Teaching from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1984 The Cognitive Computer. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Schank, R. and Abelson, R.
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schreier, M.
2004 ‘“Please help me; all I want to know is: is it real or not?”: How recipients view the reality status of The Blair Witch Project ’, Poetics Today 25(2): 305–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott Terry, W.
2009 Learning and Memory: Basic Principles, Processes and Procedures, Fourth Edition, USA: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
Seilman, U., & Larsen, S. F.
1989 ‘Personal resonance to literature: A study of remindings while reading’, Poetics 18: 165–177.Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M.
2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
1997 Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Seta, K.
1999 ‘Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche’ in K. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P.
2003 Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P.
2010 ‘Ideology and Language’ In P. Colm Hogan (Ed.) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 371-373.Google Scholar
2004 Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 ‘Point of view’ In D. McIntyre, & B. Busse (Eds.), Language and Style. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 293–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.
2016a ‘Education, education, education’. In K. Birbalsingh (Ed.) Battle Hymn of the Tiger Teachers: The Michaela Way. Woodbridge: John Catt Educational Ltd., pp. 153-156.Google Scholar
2016b ‘Top of the pyramid’. In K. Birbalsingh (Ed.) Battle Hymn of the Tiger Teachers: The Michaela Way. Woodbridge: John Catt Educational Ltd., pp. 202-206.Google Scholar
Soetoro, Barry
2015 ‘Sandy Hook “Dad” CAUGHT Playing FBI (NEWTOWN HOAX Proof)’, YouTube. Accessed 3 August 2016. Available at: https://​goo​.gl​/Ehe8X8Google Scholar
Sotirova, V.
(ed.) 2015 The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Spiro, R.
1980 ‘Prior knowledge and story processing: integration, selection and variation’, Poetics 9: 313–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982 ‘Long term comprehension: schema-based versus experiential and evaluative understanding’, Poetics 11: 77–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, R. Bruce, B. & Brewer, W.
(eds.) 1980 Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
2014 ‘The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies’. In J. Littlemore and R. Taylor (Eds.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 117-142.Google Scholar
Stratta, L., Dixon, J. & Wilkinson, A.
1973 Patterns of Language: Explorations of the Teaching of English. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Steiner, A. M.
2015 ‘Fifty Shades of Grey and 9 more examples of when fan fiction became blockbusters’, People. Time Inc. Accessed 29 July 2015. Available at: http://​goo​.gl​/4QFUiHGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P.
2002 Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction, London: Routledge Taylor Francis Group.Google Scholar
2003 ‘Schema poetics and speculative cosmology’, Language and Literature 12(3): 252–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 ‘Surreal figures’. In J. Gavins and G. Steen (eds.) Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge, pp.13-26.;Google Scholar
2008 ‘Cartographies of cognitive poetics’, Pragmatics and Cognition 16(3): 587-598.Google Scholar
2008 ‘(Sur)real stylistics: from text to contextualizing’ methods’. In R. Carter and P. Stockwell (Eds.) The Language and Literature Reader. London: Routledge, pp.198-208.;Google Scholar
2009 Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2012 ‘The artful science of literary study’, Journal of Foreign Language and Literature (Sichan). Original in Chinese (trans. by Juling Ma). Accessed 8 June 2018. Available at https://​goo​.gl​/FcZ3ChGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. & Whiteley, S.
(eds.) 2014 The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P.
2016 ‘The texture of authorial intention’. In J. Gavins and E. Lahey (Eds.) World Building: Discourse in the Mind. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Strohmetz, D. B.
2008 ‘Research artifacts and the social psychology of psychological experiments’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2: 861–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorndyke, P. W. & Yekovich, F. R.
1980 ‘A critique of schema-based theories of human story memory’, Poetics 9: 23–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, T.
1977 The Poetics of Prose. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toolan, M.
2001 Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, M.
2014 The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity and the Human Spark. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W.
(ed.) 2007 Special Issue on Foregrounding: Language and Literature 16(2): 99–224.Google Scholar
VanDerWerrf, T.
2018 ‘Novelist Lev Grossman on why James Joyce’s Dublin matches J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth’, Vox. Accessed on 7 June 2018. Available at: https://​goo​.gl​/dCBJPkGoogle Scholar
Vervaeck, B., Bernaerts, L., de Geest, D., & Herman, L.
(eds.). 2013 Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. USA: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Vice, S.
1997 ‘Heteroglossia’, Introducing Bakhtin. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 18–44.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A.
(eds.) 1989 Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. New York: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wales, K.
2014 ‘The stylistic tool-kit: methods and sub-disciplines’ in P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weaven, M. & Clark, T.
2013 ‘“I guess it scares us” – Teachers discuss the teaching of poetry in senior secondary English’, English in Education 47(3): 197-212.Google Scholar
Ward, M.
2010 The Narnia Code: C S Lewis and the Secret of the Seven Heavens. UK: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Werth, P.
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Whiteley, S.
2010 Text World Theory and the Emotional Experience of Literary Discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
2011a ‘Text World Theory, Real Readers and Emotional Responses to The Remains of the Day ’, Language and Literature 20(1): 23–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b ‘Talking about “An Accommodation”: the implications of discussion group data for community engagement and pedagogy’, Language and Literature 20(3): 236–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, V.
1925 Mrs Dalloway. UK: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Worton, M. & Still, J.
(eds.) 1990 Intertextuality: Theories and Practices, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Xerri, D.
2013 ‘Colluding in the “Torture” of poetry: Shared belief and assessment’, English in Education 47(2): 134-146.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
2004 ‘The immersed experiencer: Towards an embodied theory of language comprehension’, in B. H. Ross (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 44 . New York: Academic Press, pp.35-62.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 26], Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In Cognitive Rhetoric [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 31], Crossref logo
Ahmed, Furzeen
2021. Studying fiction: a guide for teachers and researchers. English in Education ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bell, Alice, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons & David Peplow
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
GAVIN, Polina I. & Olga B. PONOMAREVA
2021. THE LINGUO-COGNITIVE ASPECT OF EKPHRASTIC REFERENCES IN A LITERARY TEXT (BASED ON THE WORKS BY D. RUBINA AND M. ATWOOD). Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates 7:1 ► pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Kostadinova, Viktorija, Marco Wiemann, Gea Dreschler, Sune Gregersen, beáta Gyuris, A I Zhong, Maggie Scott, Lieselotte Anderwald, Beke Hansen, Sven Leuckert, Tihana Kraš, Shawnea Sum Pok Ting, Ida Parise Alessia Cogo, Elisabeth Reber & Furzeen Ahmed
2021. English Language. The Year's Work in English Studies Crossref logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. Crossref logo
Гэвин, Полина Ивановна
2021. ART IN WORDS: EKPHRASTIC REPRESENTATIONS OF PAINTINGS IN THE NOVELS BY D. RUBINA AND M. ATWOOD. Tomsk state pedagogical university bulletin :3(215) ► pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Discourse studies
Narrative Studies
Pragmatics

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019015828 | Marc record