Cover not available
Part of
Style, Rhetoric and Creativity in Language: In memory of Walter (Bill) Nash (1926-2015)
Edited by Paul Simpson
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 34] 2019
► pp. 101–112

Chapter 6
Discourse presentation and point of view in “Cheating at Canasta” by William Trevor

| University of Lancaster
This chapter examines the closing section of William Trevor’s short story, “Cheating at Canasta” (2007). Focussing on shifts in narrative viewpoint in the passage, the chapter teases out the complex transitions in viewpoint features, showing how Mallory, the story’s focaliser, engages in changing perceptions of, and reactions to, his immediate environment. Viewpoint transitions at the level of narrative style, it is argued, engender parallel shifts in the character’s changing cognitive purview, including memory, response and flashback as well as his internal assumptions and hypotheses. The author shows how a subtle understanding of the passage (and indeed the story as a whole) can enable an appreciation of the quality of the writing, concluding that stylistic analyses help to show not just how we understand literary texts but also why and how we appreciate them.
Keywords: focaliser, politeness, speech presentation, text worlds, thought presentation, turn taking
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The text
  • 2.Stylistic analysis
    • 2.1Textual proportions devoted to external narration, speech presentation and a combination of internal narration and thought presentation.
    • 2.2Speech presentation
    • 2.3Viewpoint, internal text-world variation and thought presentation
  • 3.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.34.08sho
References (10)
References
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. 2003. Possible worlds and mental spaces in Hemingway’s “A very short story”. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, Gavins, J. & Steen, G. (eds), 83–98. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pattison, S. (2018) An Empirical Characterisation of Ironies through the Use of a Dedicated DataBase PhD dissertation, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M. 2004. Corpus Stylistics. Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, M. 2011. A teaching career in three chapters: why I teach stylistics, how I teach it and why I enjoy it. In Teaching Stylistics, Jeffries, L. & McIntyre, D. (eds), 30–51. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
2012. Discourse presentation and speech (and writing, but not thought) summary. Language and Literature 21(1): 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. 1994. Reporting. Cobuild English Guides 5. London. Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Trevor, W. 2007. Cheating at Canasta. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tabbert, Ulrike & Mahmood K. Ibrahim
2023. Introduction. In Sherko Bekas, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.