Chapter published in:
Pragmatics and Literature
Edited by Siobhan Chapman and Billy Clark
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 35] 2019
► pp. 7391
References
Bennison, N.
(1993) Discourse analysis, pragmatics and the dramatic “character”: Tom Stoppard’s Professional Foul , Language and Literature 2(2), 79–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D.
(2016) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer program]. Version 6.0.15, accessed 10 October 2016 from http://​www​.praat​.org/Google Scholar
Burton, D.
(1980) Dialogue and discourse: A sociolinguistic approach to modern drama dialogue and naturally occurring conversation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
(2004) Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. and Clark, B.
(eds) (2014) Pragmatic literary stylistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B.
(2013) Procedures and prosody: weak encoding and weak communication. In F. Liedtke, and F. C. Schulze (Eds.) Beyond words: content, context, and inference (pp. 151–182). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D. and Wichmann, A.
(2003) Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11), 1545–1579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daly, N., Holmes, J., Newton, J. and Stubbe, M.
(2004) Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics 36(5), 945–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, A.
(2014) Outsourcing: a relevance-theoretic account of the interpretation of theatrical texts. In S. Chapman and B. Clark, (Eds.) Pragmatic literary stylistics (pp. 70–89). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gobl, C. and Ní Chasaide, A.
(2003) The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication 40, 189–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.) Syntax and semantics, volume III: speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, M.
(2014) Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hippey, F. and Gold, E.
(2017) Detecting remorse in the voice: a preliminary investigation into the perception of remorse using a voice line-up methodology. Paper presented at the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics (IAFPA) conference. Split, Croatia. 9th–12th July.
Horn, L.
(2004) Implicature. In L. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T.
(2006) Reading images: A grammar of visual design. 2nd edition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, A. and Xiao, R.
(2004) Swearing in modern British English: the case of “fuck” in the BNC. Language and Literature 13(3), 235–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D.
(2008) Integrating multimodal analysis and the stylistics of drama: a multimodal perspective on Ian McKellen’s Richard III . Language and Literature 17(4), 309–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D. and Bousfield, D.
(2017) (Im)politeness in fictional texts. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D. Kadar (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 759–783). Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B.
(2009) “She’s a fucking ticket”: the pragmatics of fuck in Irish English – an age and gender perspective. Corpora 4(1), 85–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nearey, Terrance M.
(1977) Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta. [Reprinted 1978 by the Indiana University Linguistics Club].Google Scholar
Nørgaard, N.
(2009) The semiotics of typography in literary texts: a multimodal approach. Orbis Litterarum 64(2), 141–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R.
(2006) Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1752–1775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, R.
(2011) The discourse of Italian cinema and beyond. Bloomsbury. Continuum.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P.
(2009) Television dialogue: The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, B. and Venables, W.
(2016) Package “nnet”, R Package version 7–3.Google Scholar
Short, M.
(1981) Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama. Applied Linguistics 11(2), 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(2004) Trust the text. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. and Montgomery, M.
(1995) Language, literature and film: the stylistics of Bernard MacLaverty’s Cal . In P. Verdonk and J. J. Weber (Eds.) Twentieth-century fiction: From text to context (pp. 138–164). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. and Kendall, T.
(2007) NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite. [Online Resource: http://​ncslaap​.lib​.ncsu​.edu​/tools​/norm/].Google Scholar
Tompkinson J., Kelly, S., Weinberg, K., and Watt, D.
(2016) Spoken threats and the forensic phonetician: what role should we play? Paper presented at the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics (IAFPA) conference. York, UK. 24th–27th July.
Watt, D., Kelly, S. and Llamas, C.
(2013) Inference of threat from neutrally-worded utterances in familiar and unfamiliar languages. York Papers in Linguistics 13, 99–120.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4  pp. 454 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.