Chapter published in:
Style and Reader Response: Minds, media, methods
Edited by Alice Bell, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and David Peplow
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 36] 2021
► pp. 1–19

Responding to style

|
|
|
|
Published online: 08 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.36.01bel
References

References

Alderson, J. C. & Short, M.
1989 Reading literature. In Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature, M. Short (ed.), 72–119. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Allington, D.
2012 Private experience, textual analysis, and institutional authority: The discursive practice of critical interpretation and its enactment in literary training. Language and Literature 21(2): 211–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allington, D. & Benwell, B.
2012 Reading the reading experience: an ethnomethodological approach to ‘booktalk’. In From Codex to Hypertext: Reading at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century, A. Lang (ed.), 217–233. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Allington, D. & Pihlaja, S.
2016 Reading in the age of the internet. Special Issue of Language and Literature on ‘Reading in the Digital Age’ 25(3): 201–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldry, A. & Thibault, P.
2006 Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
1991 Deriving categories to achieve goals. In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27), G. Bower (ed.), 1–64. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2003 Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C.
1932 Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge: Cambride University Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M.
2018 Language and Television Series: A Linguistic Approach to TV Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A.
2010 The Possible Worlds of Hypertext Fiction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Schema theory, hypertext fiction and links. Style 48(2):140–161.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Ensslin, A., van der Bom, I. & Smith, J.
2019 A reader response method not just for “you”. Language and Literature 28(3): 241–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Immersion in digital fiction. International Journal of Literary Linguistics 7(1): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benwell, B.
2012 Common-sense anti-racism in book group talk: the role of reported speech. Discourse & Society 23(4): 356–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, Elizabeth.
1993 Metaphor, simile and cognition in Golding’s The Inheritors . Language & Literature 2(1): 37–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
1984 [1933] Language. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bray, J.
2007 The “dual voice” of free indirect discourse: a reading experiment. Language and Literature 16(1): 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, G. & Vandaele, J.
(eds) 2009 Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. S. & Novak, J. L.
2007 Assessing the Intrinsic Impacts of a Live Performance. WolfBrown. http://​wolfbrown​.com​/component​/content​/article​/42​-books​-and​-reports​/400​-assessing​-the​-intrinsic​-impacts​-of​-a​-live​-performance (23 January 2020).Google Scholar
Browse, S. 2016a Revisiting Text World Theory and extended metaphor: Embedding and foregrounding metaphor in the text-worlds of the 2008 financial crash. Language and Literature 25(1): 18–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b ‘This is not the end of the world’: Situating metaphor in the text-worlds of the 2008 British Financial Crisis. In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins & E. Lahey (eds), 183–203. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2018a Cognitive Rhetoric: The Cognitive Poetics of Political Discourse. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018b From Functional to Cognitive Grammar in Stylistic Analysis of Golding’s The Inheritors . Journal of Literary Semantics 47 (2): 121–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 Straight talking honest politics: rhetorical style and ethos in the mediated politics of metamodernity. In Contemporary Media Stylistics, H. Ringrow & S. Pihlaja (eds), 241–265. London: Bloomsbury. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, N.
2011 Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M., Ionescu, A. & Fransoo, R.
2019 Metaphorical patterns in Anthropocene fiction. Language and Literature 28(3): 221–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, R.
2002 Rhetorical Affect in Early Modern Writing: Renaissance Passions Reconsidered. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Collinson, I.
2009 Everyday Readers: Reading and Popular Culture. London: Equinox. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G.
1994 Discourse and Literature: The Interplay of Form and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, P.
2001 Allegory: conceptual metaphor in history. Language and Literature 10(1): 5–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Allegory and symbol – a fundamental opposition? Language and Literature 14(4): 323–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012  The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel? Language and Literature 21(4): 328–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P., Heywood, J. & Steen, G.
2002 Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification. Language and Literature 11(1): 55–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, T.
2014 Performance. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 456–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culler, J.
1975 Structural Poetics. London: Routledge & Kenan Paul. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
2001 Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. & Bortolussi, M.
2008 Textual and extra-textual manipulations in the empirical study of literary response. In Directions in Empirical Literary Studies, S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (eds), 75–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowrick, C., Billington, J., Robinson, J., Hamer, A. & Williams, C.
2012 Get into reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: Exploring catalysts for change. Medical Humanities 38: 15–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ensslin, A., Bell, A., van der Bom, I., Smith, J. & Skains, L.
2018 Immersion, digital fiction, and the switchboard metaphor. Participations 16(1): 320–342. https://​www​.participations​.org​/Volume%2016​/Issue%201​/16​.pdf (23 January 2020).Google Scholar
Evans, V. & Green M. 2006 Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
1994 Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fialho, O.
2007 Foregrounding and familiarization: understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature 16(2): 105–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1982 Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (eds), 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Fish, S.
1980 [1973] What is stylistics and why are they saying such terrible things about it? In Is There A Text in this Class?, S. Fish (ed.), 68–96. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, R.
1971 The Languages of Literature: Some Linguistic Contributions to Criticism. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
1977 Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Freshwater, H.
2009 Theatre & Audience. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins J.
2005 (Re)thinking modality: A Text World Theory perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 34(2): 79–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins J. & Lahey, E.
(eds) 2016 World Building: Discourse in the Mind. London; New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gavins. J. & Steen, G.
(eds) 2003 Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London; New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A.
2012 Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. London; New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016a ‘Multimodality, Cognitive Poetics, and Genre: Reading Grady Hendrix’s novel Horrorstör’, Multimodal Communication 5(1): 15–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b Building Hollywood in Paddington: Text World Theory, immersive theatre, and Punchdrunk’s The Drowned Man . In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins & E. Lahey (eds), 71–89. London; New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 Identifying and appreciating poetic metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics 31: 101–112.Google Scholar
2003 Prototypes in dynamic meaning construal. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins & G. Steen (eds), 27–40. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M. & Harrison, C.
2018 Cognitive grammar in stylistics : A practical guide. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M., Harrison, C. & Nuttall, L.
Forthcoming. New Directions in Cognitive Grammar and Style. London: Bloomsbury.
Graesser, A., Kassler, M. A., Kreuz, R. J. & McLain-Allen, B.
1998 Verification of statements about story worlds that deviate from normal conceptions of time: what is true about Einstein’s Dreams? Cognitive Psychology 35: 246–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. 2008 Empirical research into the processing of free indirect discourse and the imperative of ecological validity. In Directions in Empirical Literary Studies, S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova & J. Auracher (eds), 21–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1973 Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s “The Inheritors”. In Explorations in the Functions of Language, M. A. K. Halliday (ed.), 103–44. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
2014 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. London: Arnold. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C.
2017 Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. & Yuan, W.
(eds) 2014 Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, J., Semino, E. & Short, M.
2002 Linguistic metaphor identification in two extracts from novels. Language and Literature 11(1): 35–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L.
2000 Negation, Text Worlds, and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
2002 Creating things that are not: the role of negation in the poetry of Wislawa Szymborska. Journal of Literary Semantics. 30(2): 113–32.Google Scholar
Hodge, S., Robinson, J. & Davis, P.
2007 Reading between the lines: the experiences of taking part in a community reading project. Medical Humanities 33: 100–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, C. & Kirner-Ludwig, M.
(eds) 2020 Telecinematic Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iser, W.
1978 The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MA: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L.
2001 Schema Affirmation and White Asparagus: Cultural multilingualism among readers of texts. Language and Literature 10(4): 325–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Meaning negotiated: an investigation into reader and author meaning. In Textual Secrets: The Message of the Medium, S. Csabi & J. Zerkowitz (eds), 241–261. Budapest: Eotvos-Lorand University.Google Scholar
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T.
1996 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001 Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
1989 More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. 2: Descriptive Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 2008 Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, E.
2003 Book Clubs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mason, J.
2019 Intertextuality in Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McAlister, S.
2006 The explosive devices of memory’: Trauma and the construction of identity in narrative. Language and Literature 15(1): 91–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D.
2006 Point of View in Plays: A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Viewpoint in Drama and Other Text-Types. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Integrating multimodal analysis and the stylistics of drama: A socio-pragmatic analysis of Dennis Potter’s Brimstone and Treacle . Language and Literature 13(2): 139–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
2002 A feeling for fiction: becoming what we behold. Poetics 30: 221–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M.
1975 A framework for representing knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston (ed.), 211–77. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Morini, M.
2013 Towards a Musical Stylistics: Movement in Kate Bush’s “Running Up That Hill”. Language and Literature 22(4): 283–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nahajec, L.
2009 Negation and the Creation of Implicit Meaning in Poetry. Language and Literature 18(2): 109–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, P. M.
2011 Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York; Chichester: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, N.
2019 Multimodal Stylistics of the Novel: More than Words. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norledge, J.
2016  Reading the Dystopian Short Story . Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
Oatley, K.
2003 Writingandreading: the future of cognitive poetics. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins & G. Steen (eds), 161–173. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Toole, M.
1994 The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Participations
2017 About Participations: History and founding principles. Participations Journal of Audience and Reception Studies. Online: https://​www​.participations​.org​/about​.htm (23 January 2020)Google Scholar
Peplow, D.
2016 Talk About Books: A Study of Reading Groups. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Peplow, D. & Carter, R.
2014 Stylistics and real readers. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M. Burke (ed.), 440–454. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P. & Whiteley, S.
2016 The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piazza, R., Bednarek, M. & Rossi, D.
(eds) 2011 Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, S.
2018 Religious Talk Online: Muslim, Christian, and Atheist Discourse on Social Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Antagonism on YouTube. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Popova, Y. B.
2003 ‘The fool sees with his nose’: Metaphoric mappings in the sense of smell in Patrick Süskind’s Perfume . Language and Literature 12(2): 135–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radbourne, J., Glow, H. & Johanson, K. 2013 ‘Knowing and measuring the audience experience. In The Audience Experience: A Critical Analysis of Audience in the Performing Arts, J. Radbourne, H. Glow & K. Johanson (eds), 3–13. Bristol; Chicago, IL: Intellect.Google Scholar
Ringrow, H.
2020 “Beautiful masterpieces”: Metaphors of the female body in modest fashion blogs. In Contemporary Media Stylistics, H. Ringrow & S. Pihlaja (eds), 15–34. London: Bloomsbury. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ringrow, H. & Pihlaja, S.
(eds) 2020 Contemporary Media Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C.
1981 Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32: 89–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R.
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E. & Wessels, E.
2007 Listening to audiences: A brief rationale and history of audience research in popular media studies. International Journal of Listening 21(1): 14–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
1995 Schema theory and the analysis of text worlds in poetry. Language and Literature 4(2): 79–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2002 A cognitive stylistics approach to mind style in narrative fiction. In Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis, E. Semino & J. Culpeper (eds), 95–122. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Blending and characters’ mental functioning in Virginia Woolf’s ‘Lappin and Lapinova’. Language and Literature 15(1): 55–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Mind Style 25 Years On. Style 41(2): 153–73.Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Culpeper, J.
(eds) 2002 Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. & Swindlehurst, K.
1996 Metaphor and Mind Style in Ken Kesey’s One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest . Style 30(1): 143–66.Google Scholar
Senkbeil, K. & Hoppe, N.
2016 ‘The sickness stands at your shoulder …’: Embodiment and cognitive metaphor in Hornbacher’s Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia . Language and Literature 25(1): 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Short, M.
1981 Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama. Applied Linguistics 2(2): 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 From dramatic text to dramatic performance. In Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context, J. Culpeper, P. Verdonk & M. Short (eds), 6–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Short, M. & van Peer, W.
1989 Accident! Stylisticians evaluate: aims and methods of stylistic analysis. In Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature, M. Short (ed.), 22–71. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Simpson, P.
2014 Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorline, S.
2016 Language and Manipulation in House of Cards: A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sotirova, V.
2006 Readers’ responses to narrative point of view. Poetics 34(2): 108–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. 2003 ‘Love Stories’: Cognitive Scenarios in Love Poetry. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins & G. Steen (eds), 67–82. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
1999 The inflexibility of invariance. Language and Literature 8(2): 125–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2003 The Poetics of Science Fiction. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2009 Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading : A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2014 Atmosphere and Tone. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 360–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction, 2nd ed. London; New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. & Whiteley, S.
2014 The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K.
2013 One metaphor to rule them all? ‘Objects’ as tests of character in The Lord of the Rings . Language and Literature 22(1): 77–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Visibility and economy as dimensions of metaphoric language. Language and Literature, 23(4): 347–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swann, J. & Allington, D.
2009 Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature 18(3): 247–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
2006 Whose Rhyme is Whose Reason? Language and Literature 15(1): 29–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, V.
2006 Ways of reading Sherlock Holmes: the entrenchment of discourse blends. Language and Literature 15(1): 73–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, J. P.
(ed.) 1980 Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore, MA; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer F. & Schmidt, H.-J.
1996 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W.
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Peer, W.
1986 Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Werth, P.
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
West. D.
2019 Introduction: The challenges of the song lyric. Language and Literature 28(1): 3–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, S.
2011 Text World Theory, real readers and emotional responses to The Remains of the Day . Language and Literature 20(1): 23–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Building resonant worlds: Experiencing the text-worlds of The Unconsoled . In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins & E. Lahey (eds), 165–182. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Whiteley, S. & Canning, P.
2017 Reader Response Research in Stylistics. Language and Literature 26(2): 71–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.
2004 The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 44, 35–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar