Chapter 8
Evaluating news events
Using appraisal for reader response
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Reader response to news media
- 3.Evaluative language analysis
- 3.1Appreciation
- 3.2Appraisal and news values
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1News texts collection
- 4.2Interview collection
- 4.3Analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1Reader response through negative quality
- Similarities in negative quality use
- 5.2Differences in news event evaluations using negative quality
- 5.3Summary of Results
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Allington, D. & Swann, J.
2009 Researching literary reading as social practice.
Language and Literature 18(3): 219–230.


Bakhtin, M. M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Texas: University of Texas Press.

BBC
2014a As it happened: Gaza conflict intensifies.
BBC.com, 20 July 2014,
[URL] (31 May 2017).

BBC
2014b Gaza shelling by Israel leads to deadliest day of conflict.
BBC.com, 20 July 2014,
[URL] (31 May 2017).

BBC
2014c Gaza crisis: Toll of operations in Gaza.
BBC.com, 1 September 2014,
[URL] (31 May 2017).

Bednarek, M.
2008 Emotion Talk across Corpora. Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan.


Bednarek, M. & Caple, H.
2012 News Discourse. London: Continuum.

Bednarek, M. & Caple, H.
2014 Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond.
Discourse & Society 25(2): 135–158.


Bednarek, M. & Caple, H.
2017 The Discourse of News Values. How News Organizations Create Newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Bell, A.
1991 The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bunz, M.
2010 Google’s news experiment Living Stories to go open source.
TheGuardian.co.uk, 17 February 2010,
[URL] (24 April 2018).

Charmaz, K.
2006 Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practice Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.

Coffin, C. & O’Halloran, K.
2005 Finding the global groove: theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using Appraisal, corpus and a concordancer.
Critical Discourse Studies 2(2): 143–163.


Cooper, C. R.
1976 Empirical studies of response to literature: review and suggestions.
The Journal of Aesthetic Education 10(3/4): 77–93.


Cotter, C.
2010 News Talk: Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Don, A. C.
2009 Legitimating tenor relationships: Affiliation and alignment in written interaction.
Linguistics and the Human Sciences 5(3): 303–327.

Don, A. C.
2016 It’s hard to mesh all this: Invoking attitude, persona and argument organisation.
Functional Linguistics 3(9): n.p.

Dörnyei, Z.
2007 Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drasovean, A. & Tagg, C.
2015 Evaluative language and its solidarity-building role on TED.com: an Appraisal and corpus analysis.
Language@Internet 12: n.p.

Du Bois, J. W.
2007 The stance triangle. In
Stancetaking in Discourse,
R. Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


DuBois, J. W. & Kärkkäinen, E.
2012 Taking a stance on emotion: affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction.
Text&Talk 32(4): 433–451.

Eriksson Barajas, K.
2015 Discursive reception studies – a path toward knowledge about fiction in everyday life.
Journal of Literary Theory 9(1): 4–24.


Fairclough, N.
1995 Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Fowler, R.
1991 Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.

Franklin, B. & Eldridge, S. A.
2017 The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies. London: Routledge.

Fuoli, M. & Hommerberg, C.
2015 Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions.
Corpora 10(3): 315–349.


Galtung, J. & Ruge, M. H.
1965 The structure of foreign news.
Journal of Peace Research 2(1): 64–91.


Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. & Hunston, S.
2016 Corpora and beyond – investigating evaluation in discourse: Introduction to the special issue on corpus approaches to evaluation.
Corpora 11(2): 131–141.


Hall, G.
2009 Texts, readers – and real readers.
Language and Literature 18(3): 331–337.


Harcup, T. & O’Neill, D.
2016 What is news?: News values revisited (again).
Journalism Studies 18(12): 1470–1488.


Hermida, A.
2016 Social media and the news. In
The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism,
T. Witschge,
C. W. Anderson,
D. Domingo &
A. Hermida (eds), 81–94. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.


Hommerberg, C.
2015 Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis.
Text&Talk 35(2): 155–175.

Hunston, S. & Sinclair, J.
2000 A local grammar of evaluation. In
Evaluation in Text,
S. Hunston &
G. Thompson (eds), 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Klemenz-Belgardt, E.
1981 American research on response to literature: The empirical studies.
Poetics 10: 357–380.


Lehman-Wilzig, S. N. & Seletzky, M.
2010 Hard news, soft news, ‘general’ news: The necessity and utility of an intermediate classification.
Journalism 11(1): 37–56.


Li, Y. K.
2016 The impact of recurrent propositions on readers’ perceptions of gist: a study of hard news.
Text&Talk 36(1): 67–87.

Lynfield, B.
2015 Gaza, a year on from Operation Protective Edge: The traumatised kibbutz on Israel’s front line, still recovering from last summer’s war with Hamas.
The Independent.co.uk, 6 July 2015
[URL] (24 April 2018)

Macken-Horarik, M.
2003 Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative.
Text 23(2): 285–312.


Martin, J. R.
1995 Reading positions/positioning readers: Judgment in English.
Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL 10(2): 27–37.

Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. R.
2005 The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan.


Miall, D. S.
2006 Empirical approaches to studying literary readers: The state of the discipline.
Book History 9: 291–311.


Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
1994 Foregrounding, defamiliarisation, and affect: Response to literary studies.
Poetics 22: 389–407.


Myrick, J. G. & Wojdynski, B.
2016 Moody news: The impact of collective emotion ratings on online news consumers’ attitudes toward and memory for content.
New Media & Society 18(11): 2576–2594.


Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. L. & Nielsen, R. K.
2017 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017.
Reuters Institute for Journalism Studies [URL] (9 January 2018)

Nuttall, L.
2017 Online readers between the camps: A Text World Theory analysis of ethical positioning in We Need to Talk About Kevin
.
Language and Literature 26(2): 153–171.


Ofcom
2018 News Consumption in the UK: 2018.
Ofcom.org.uk [URL] (30 November 2018)

Peplow, D. & Carter, R.
2014 Stylistics and real readers. In
The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics,
M. Burke (ed.), 440–454. London: Routledge.

Precht, K.
2003 Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation.
Text 23(2): 239–257.


Read, J. & Carroll, J.
2012 Annotating expressions of Appraisal in English.
Language Resources & Evaluation 46: 421–447.


Sabao, C.
2016 Arguments for an Appraisal linguistic discourse approach to the analysis of ‘objectivity’ in ‘hard’ news reports.
African Journalism Studies 37(1): 40–63.


Steensen, S.
2014 Conversing the audience: A methodological exploration of how conversation analysis can contribute to the analysis of interactive journalism.
New Media & Society 16(8): 1197–1213.


Teo, P.
2000 Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers.
Discourse & Society 11(1): 7–49.


Tereszkiewicz, A.
2014 “I’m Not Sure What That Means Yet, But We’ll Soon Find Out”: The discourse of newspaper live blogs.
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 131(3): 299–319.

The Guardian
2015a Oregon college shooting: Gunman identified as Chris Harper Mercer – as it happened.
The Guardian, 14 July 2017
[URL] (1 December 2017).

The Guardian
2015b “Another mass shooting in America”: Oregon killings a grim familiarity for US.
The Guardian, 2 October 2015
[URL] (9 January 2018).

Thompson, G. & Hunston, S.
2000 Evaluation: An Introduction. In
Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse,
S. Hunston &
G. Thompson (eds), 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thurman, N. & Newman, N.
2014 The future of breaking news online? Journalism Studies 15(5): 655–667.


Thurman, N. & Schapals, A. K.
2016 Live blogs, sources, and objectivity: The contradictions of real-time online reporting. In
The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies,
B. Franklin &
S. Eldridge (eds), 283–292. London: Routledge.


Thurman, N. & Walters, A.
2013 Live blogging – digital journalism’s pivotal platform? A case study of the production, consumption, and form of live blogs at Guardian.co.uk
.
Digital Journalism 1(1): 82–101.


Van Dijk, T. A.
1988 News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Van Driel, M.
2020 “It makes it more real”: A comparative analysis of Twitter use in live blogs and quotations in older news media from a reader response perspective. In
Message and Medium: English Language Practices Across New and Old Media,
C. Tagg &
M. Evans (eds), 306–328. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Van Peer, W.
1983 Poetic style and reader response: An exercise in empirical studies.
Journal of Literary Semantics 12(2): 3–18.


White, P. R. R.
2003 Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance.
Text 23(2): 259–284.


White, P. R. R.
2012 Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories – attribution and Attitudinal positioning.
Discourse, Context & Media 1(2/3): 57–67.


Whiteley, S. & Canning, P.
2017 Reader response research in stylistics.
Language and Literature 26(2): 71–87.


Witschge, T., Anderson, C. W., Domingo, D. & Hermida, A.
2016 The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. London: SAGE.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Price, Hazel
2022.
The year’s work in stylistics 2021.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4
► pp. 519 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.