In this study we assumed that the relation between readers’ and characters’ group identity would influence narrative empathy and thereby the impact of a short story. We used three social psychological models (infrahumanization, mentalization and linguistic inter-group bias) to test our assumptions. Methodologically, we used a narrative recall paradigm based on the assumption that narrative recall carries also the experiential aspects of the text processing and thereby enables a fine grained analysis of meaning construction. We also measured liking of the story as an impact variable and the strength of national identification as a moderator variable. Results only partly supported our assumptions. Whereas empathy and liking are strongly correlated, Hungarian subjects overall did not feel more empathy with the characters of the Hungarian story version, did not like more this story, did not assign more secondary emotions to the Hungarian characters, and did not describe positive behavior of the Hungarian characters more abstractly then happened in the case of the “Slovak story” version.
2023. Introduction: stylistic approaches to narrative empathy. Journal of Literary Semantics 52:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Stradling, Fransina & Kimberley Pager-McClymont
2023. The role of pathetic fallacy in shaping narrative empathy. Journal of Literary Semantics 52:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Fernandez-Quintanilla, Carolina
2020. Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:2 ► pp. 124 ff.
Szabó, Zsolt P., Noémi Z. Mészáros & István Csertő
2017. The Role of Perceived In-group Moral Superiority in Reparative Intentions and Approach Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Fülöp, Éva, Bernadette Péley & János László
2011. A történelmi pályához kapcsolódó érzelmek modellje magyar történelmi regényekben. Pszichológia 31:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Keen, Suzanne
2011. Empathetic Hardy: Bounded, Ambassadorial, and Broadcast Strategies of Narrative Empathy. Poetics Today 32:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.